[QUOTE="rawbwilsh"]What if killzone DOESNT match the trailer? What will you say? I will say Hello Nokia Ngage.sdifjds
Even if it did match the trailer, there would be people saying that it didn't. So of course even if it is the best game we've seen visually so far, Lemmings will bash it because big brother did something that little bro didn't.
it doesnt matter how great killzone 2 graphics are, it doesnt mean a goodPC cant do better. PCs will always be ahead of consoles. and thats a fact.
i dont care how great the graphics are, if the game has boring gameplay then it wont matter. id rather play a shooter that has great shooting action and is tactical, than a run of the mill shooter with great graphics. and I dought the graphics will reach the trailer. the trailer was CGI, whens the last time a game looked as good as the CGI?
Gladius. its probally one of the best modern RPGs I have ever played. it is in depth, complex, interesting and addictive as hell! NO idea why it isnt mentioned much. it is imo better than any of the modern final fantasy games. I would even go so far as to say its a bit better than FF7 ( which imo, is not the masterwork everyone says it is, its good, but not that amazing) plus gladius has co op and a skirmish mode for up to 4 players! I can never tire of that game.
[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]It looks exactly like the CGI trailer. Oh sorry it doesn't. Jesus why am I being cynical, this is actually one of the games I want. Oh god I'm becoming a hater.Willy105
the trailer was never CG:| or was it?...link?
I think it was gameplay, it did have a lot of slowdown near the explosions.
wait, so there is gameplay? you got a link to it, I wanna see that.
this is a great game, is it because people are so used to fast paced shooters they cant play a slow, complex strategy game without thinking it sucks? Battlestations is a truley unique game, and it gets less than an 8? cmon now, it deserves an 8.3-9 at least.
Log in to comment