@fox_fury @jcr8 That's because the porting jobs from console to PC are lazy, rushed, and inferior. If aa PC version was optimized for PC the same way that they do it for consoles, then a 6-7 year old PC would still look better than the XBOX or PS3

"These are living, open worlds with evolving stories, changing time of day…and every one is full of players," says engineering lead Chris Butcher. "Destiny is an always online experience, but it's not an MMO."

Congradulation, you just perfectly described an MMO. "Not an MMO, a new experience" that's what they all say. I am excited about this new MMO though, expecially the no subscription part!

Something lost in translation much? Can someone also look up the english meaning of MOE too, because i have "MOE" idea! You see that? You see what i did there?

@brainiac1988 @Claytonicus Ah, you meant the multiplayer. In that sense, yes i agree! I was referring to the campaign, which i didn't think was so great, but like you said, we all have our own opinions, and we should all respect each others!

@brainiac1988 @Claytonicus Ah, now i see what you were talking about, and yes i agree. The multiplayer was pretty good in it. Our opinions don't differ on that point. I respect your opinions, and i agree that what might be great for one person is not necessarily the same for another. The aim is to enjoy and share the experience i think!

@brainiac1988 @Claytonicus Halo 3 was halo 2 with a few extra bits. It looked the same, it played the same, and there was nothing innovative about it whatsoever, except for its badly scripted timing events (like when you kill all of the enemies quickly in the dropship scene and have to wait 5 min because it's timed - LAZY - ). Halo 4 has put new life into the series thankfully.

@DarkRaven0021 @Claytonicus ty, and i completely agree. The more competition we have, the greater to range, diversity and quality of products that companies produce. I have all 3 as well, it's the only way to have a truly objective opinion, instead of those ppl who slander other systems despite lack of ownership and lack of ever having used an opposing console.

Graphically it looked very average, gameplay looked equally average, and the voice acting in no way sounded "badass", instead resembling to me someone with a serious constipation problem. I'll pass thanks.

@Halloll I refer to the video post created by sammoth above, which you should look at immediately. You do realize that most games that are created that are multi platform are created on either the xbox or ps3 consoles and then ported to pc in the crappiest possible way because of laziness don't you? A PC will ALWAYS have more powerful hardware than a console, and that is a fact. The issue here is the poor quality of the port and the optimisation for PC. developers figure "oh, the pc is more powerful, so we won't bother with too many optimisation tweaks to make it run it's best". It's laziness Halloll, not inferior pc hardware.

Way to perpetuate the deep seeded hatreds of fanboys by creating such a complete and utterly useless topic. We all know that there are plenty of morons out there who rant on about the mein kampf of gaming. This is a topic that is so worn out and boring, and if it weren't for the fact that nothing much else on the home page of GS caught my eye, i wouldn't even be bothering to post a comment. Coexist people, all consoles havc their own vices and virtues.