@packerfan7575: Wat. Information is information. You could be represented in 1s and 0s. I recommend learning some hardcore math if you want to understand nature and spirit, because it's what life is made of.
@scarred_fox: I actually didn't even think it was slow, though since it was brought up in the review I do question why every action on console requires the button hold routine. I think overall the UI is pretty great, especially the item descriptions. Only thing I would've liked is a hover over description of the various bars on stat parameters.
Mixed feelings about the response to this game and evaluation of games in general. I personally don't feel that it does things like shooting or UI poorly, it just isn't as deep or refined as a AAA polished game with 500 people working on it and 10 years of engine revamps behind it. I really think it's time for players to reassess what they expect from games, because wanting it all is unrealistic and will diminish the chances of seeing unique and ambitious IP from very talented developers that want to try new things.
@gotrekfabian: You can buy antimatter from NPCs at trading posts / space stations or from the galactic trading network. I'm not sure how stock rotates on the trade network, but NPCs definitely have a variable stock, just gotta look for it.
@dehelix: If you find a Trading Post you'll notice NPCs sometimes land there. You can interact with the ships that are docked and offer to buy the ship from the NPC. I've seen them for as low as 150k or so I believe.
What I find most fascinating about the comments is that there's a game the size of a universe and a whole mess of people would rather complain about anything they can possibly think of instead of appreciate it.
@n00bs7ay3r: We have laws in place to protect artists from people like this. I'm not asking you for your reasoning. I'm telling you that in principle the actions of this guy are self serving and offensive to creators. The fact that you're concerned about the game not being good has *nothing to do with the prior argument*.
Cataclysmic0001's comments