Releasing a lot of really awesome 'Hardcore' games (the kind you and I play) won't garner the success of the original Wii.
In order for Nintendo to achieve that success again, they'll have to think of another way to court the casual audience that bought the original in massive quantities. A Wii Sports Sequel? Seriously, how could they not have shipped the system with said game.. Whatta *@ up/oversight.
I'm not sure exactly how powerful the Wii U is in comparison to current gen consoles, but it is definitely in their tier and not higher, yes.
I wouldn't really consider it "Next Gen" in the graphical sense. It's pretty much what the Wii was to the last console gen. On par with the previous gen, not the new one.
Well, that wheel might not bring them the same results as the success of the original Wii.
These are the same tactics they used prior to the Wii's success. And I don't think it's what led to the overwhelming sales of the Wii. Trying something new is what led to that success, I feel.
Perhaps he means the "Hardcore" audience? As much smack as they tend to talk, they will eventually buy all the consoles anyhow.
This is especially true of the kind of people who hang around NeoGaf. Most of them are console enthusiasts and can be easily swayed into buy a new one with the promise of a new Zelda, Mario, etc.
This is NOT true of the "Casual" audience that was the backbone of the original Wii's sales. They have to come up with more clever things in order to court them again. Newer franchises and whatnot.
I don't understand why so many people are upset by this.
One of his main points was that Nintendo has become too predictable with their main releases. I think most Nintendo fans agree that Nintendo didn't always rely on the same 4 or so franchises so heavily.
All of these franchises exist because Nintendo used to take more chances with their releases.
There's really nothing too controversial about those statements.
BradBurns' comments