@gpuking: Are you pulling those pics online or from screenshare? It's such a pain in the ass to post screenshare pics without them being compressed. I was curious if your going through all the trouble?
@panda30: These fanboys UC4 thread are annoying but your obsession about the game you don't like is equally annoying. Your literally everywhere and look for the shitiest stuff you can find about this game.
To you UC4 has to play in these incredible standards. No bugs, has to stream in high quality textures, ground texture with proper filtering from some incredible furthest of distances. It has to do that or everyone is hiding everything.
Shit go watch DF ROTTR xboxone vs 360 pretend its UC4 and laugh at the fact that some of the short cuts caused some of the texture filtering to look worse than the 360 version. With your dedication all of these impressive tech games have shitty graphics and people who praise them are hiding them. WTF has this game done to you.
No NEO needed. Just compare TR 2013 which released on both the Xbone/PS4 where the PS4 version had higher resolution. The games are running on the same engine and the games were also designed with last gen in mind (TR= PS3/360 and Rise = 360).
There should be a similar upgrade with Rise of the TR as well, and to be honest, SE is going to need to do something special and add incentives to help sell this game as late ports traditionally sell poorly. Adding incentives to late ports is also something many publishers have done in the past, and I would imagine some free DLC on the disc, play up the increased resolution, or something to that effect.
lol more photomodes, more and more and more. Non stop.
PHOTO DAT' MODE
More and more salt, non stop so salty
Aaand here is what happens when you catch a cow red handed before he can find that perfect distant and upwards angle to hide the bad textures, apply some blur, and then use a little sharpening to top it all off!
Both games have very strong moments. Uncharted cutscenes sports higher resolution models, lighting and textures to that of gameplay. Tomb Raider look and feel does not fluctuate, it stays the same throughout the experience. There are scenes that are very strong in Uncharted and Tomb Raider. SO anyone stating that Game A blows away Game B is a moron. And you don't want to be a moron.
its all very simple really if you guys scare to post NORMAL screenshot as in character in plable forum then all your salty arguments are worthless
its obios you all refuse to do this because in game mode the game dont look as good
so sad that when you google Uncharted 4 all you get is cinematic and the only gameplay its from the alpha demo not 1 person dares to post gameplay screenshots
You guys seem to be judging art direction more than actual graphical technologies used. Technically, TR's "Horizon" engine does more and has heavier use of higher end GPU's than the "naughty dog 4 engine" which still uses most assets from the PS3 versions, just a new run time. From an art direction perspective, tropical environments always tend to look more visually appealing than colder climates but ultimately it comes down to which game is more fun to play. I've played neither but I'd assume U4 is probably more fun.
If you want to play more than watch then you would have more fun with TR but TR also has its share of watching but not as much as Uncharted. Just to clarify, they both have too much cutscenes.
lol more photomodes, more and more and more. Non stop.
PHOTO DAT' MODE
More and more salt, non stop so salty
Aaand here is what happens when you catch a cow red handed before he can find that perfect distant and upwards angle to hide the bad textures, apply some blur, and then use a little sharpening to top it all off!
"NO FAIR, I WAS STILL SETTING UP THE SHOT!"
what your trying to prove thats a cinematic vs photomode you prove nothing
try gameplay and yea photo mode can improve the picture but that doesn't mean you did sooooo ... yea jokes on you all you manage to do its prove you're desperate
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
Yeah, you're full of shit.
@dynamitecop said:
lol this fucking guy, doesn't even have Tomb Raider so he's just grabbing random images from all over the internet...
not to mention the photomode shit he's trying to pass off for UC4, god you suck at this, at least try to be objective...
Another gpooking thread, and another 5 pages of shit posting incoming.
Why everyone humours this guy is beyond me.
Because its humorous.
Really? all he ever does is graphic king threads, and after you've read 1 of his threads you've read them all. I guess people could find this funny once, but his shit never changes, I never thought repetition could be so funny.
Where the hell is everyone getting this idea that Uncharted 4 photo mode is this magical mode that instantly enhances the picture quality? The settings in this mode cannot and do not have the ability to sharpen the image any further than it already is. All it does is let you put things in less focus, position the camera, and add filters. These filters are so minor, the game lets you slap them in mid gameplay whenever you want and it doesn't even have to reset to any checkpoint. Stop being so petty!
Where the hell is everyone getting this idea that Uncharted 4 photo mode is this magical mode that instantly enhances the picture quality? The settings in this mode cannot and do not have the ability to sharpen the image any further than it already is. All it does is let you put things in less focus, position the camera, and add filters. These filters are so minor, the game lets you slap them in mid gameplay whenever you want and it doesn't even have to reset to any checkpoint. Stop being so petty!
If photomodes make almost no difference, why use them almost exclusively? Also, taking bad textures out of focus or view is far from not making any differences. Just post pure gameplay shots,
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
It was a cross gen game afterall.
He's confusing it with xboxone version. That is a shimmering mess. For such a beatiful game on xboxone it has one of the poor AA solution. Image quality might have been better at 900p with better AA and AF. Actually beaten by the 360 version in some aspect. PC cleans all that up.
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
It was a cross gen game afterall.
He's confusing it with xboxone version. That is a shimmering mess. For such a beatiful game on xboxone it has one of the poor AA solution. Image quality might have been better at 900p with better AA and AF. Actually beaten by the 360 version in some aspect. PC cleans all that up.
pc version has the exact same aa as xbone you clueless derp
Where the hell is everyone getting this idea that Uncharted 4 photo mode is this magical mode that instantly enhances the picture quality? The settings in this mode cannot and do not have the ability to sharpen the image any further than it already is. All it does is let you put things in less focus, position the camera, and add filters. These filters are so minor, the game lets you slap them in mid gameplay whenever you want and it doesn't even have to reset to any checkpoint. Stop being so petty!
If photomodes make almost no difference, why use them almost exclusively? Also, taking bad textures out of focus or view is far from not making any differences. Just post pure gameplay shots,
Exactly, I keep asking gpuking to just post one gameplay shot with proof of a HUD. Just one! That's all it takes, but I have still yet to see one.
No one apparently knows what filters can do here. I'll just post what I posted in another thread. This is with DOF, sharpening, softening, saturation and other filters. This is Sweetfx--it's much more advanced, but it's still possible to pretty up a picture even with just minor filters.
i have tomb raider on pc and its one of the most aliased, jaggy, grainy games ive ever seen. even at 4k its just disgusting. tomb raider at 4k has at least as much aliasing as a typical ps or 360 game at 720p.
It was a cross gen game afterall.
He's confusing it with xboxone version. That is a shimmering mess. For such a beatiful game on xboxone it has one of the poor AA solution. Image quality might have been better at 900p with better AA and AF. Actually beaten by the 360 version in some aspect. PC cleans all that up.
pc version has the exact same aa as xbone you clueless derp
Interesting. I didn't know you could switch from FXAA to SSAA on the Xbone version.
"The main anti-aliasing option in Rise of the Tomb Raider is FXAA, a fast post-process solution that anti-aliases edges and transparencies to a decent degree. It may not be to everyone's taste, because of texture blur and the introduction of temporal aliasing, but typically in modern games traditional Multisample Anti-Aliasing (MSAA) techniques are either incompatible or too demanding. Those seeking an alternative can try Rise of the Tomb Raider's other anti-aliasing option, Supersampling Anti-Aliasing (SSAA).
SSAA acts much like NVIDIA Dynamic Super Resolution, increasing the internal rendering resolution of the game before downsampling the result to the display's screen resolution. On a 1920x1080 monitor, 2x SSAA renders Rise of the Tomb Raider at 2688x1512, and at 3840x2160 with 4x SSAA. The output has significantly more detail per pixel, increasing the quality of texturing, the fidelity of effects, and the visibility of background detail. And aliasing is all but eliminated, delivering a super high-quality picture.
Of course, the performance cost is immense, as it would be when rendering natively at a higher resolution on a high-resolution monitor, or using Dynamic Super Resolution to boost the rendering resolution. If you have the horsepower though you can combine SSAA with higher rendering resolutions to output at an effective 7680x4320, which is how DeadEndThrills produced these stunning screenshots."
He's confusing it with xboxone version. That is a shimmering mess. For such a beatiful game on xboxone it has one of the poor AA solution. Image quality might have been better at 900p with better AA and AF. Actually beaten by the 360 version in some aspect. PC cleans all that up.
pc version has the exact same aa as xbone you clueless derp
Interesting. I didn't know you could switch from FXAA to SSAA on the Xbone version.
"The main anti-aliasing option in Rise of the Tomb Raider is FXAA, a fast post-process solution that anti-aliases edges and transparencies to a decent degree. It may not be to everyone's taste, because of texture blur and the introduction of temporal aliasing, but typically in modern games traditional Multisample Anti-Aliasing (MSAA) techniques are either incompatible or too demanding. Those seeking an alternative can try Rise of the Tomb Raider's other anti-aliasing option, Supersampling Anti-Aliasing (SSAA).
SSAA acts much like NVIDIA Dynamic Super Resolution, increasing the internal rendering resolution of the game before downsampling the result to the display's screen resolution. On a 1920x1080 monitor, 2x SSAA renders Rise of the Tomb Raider at 2688x1512, and at 3840x2160 with 4x SSAA. The output has significantly more detail per pixel, increasing the quality of texturing, the fidelity of effects, and the visibility of background detail. And aliasing is all but eliminated, delivering a super high-quality picture.
Of course, the performance cost is immense, as it would be when rendering natively at a higher resolution on a high-resolution monitor, or using Dynamic Super Resolution to boost the rendering resolution. If you have the horsepower though you can combine SSAA with higher rendering resolutions to output at an effective 7680x4320, which is how DeadEndThrills produced these stunning screenshots."
@m3dude1: you got all of that you clueless derp. If you got the hardware you have choices.
They know exactly what photomode can do, they're just fanboys. You have to remember, these are the same type of people that SWORE by "The human eye can't see past 30 FPS" last gen on Sony forums.
They'll say whatever they can, not that DF will get fooled.
@gpuking: Are you pulling those pics online or from screenshare? It's such a pain in the ass to post screenshare pics without them being compressed. I was curious if your going through all the trouble?
Your pics are always high quality.
They were png screenshare from my PS4 but then I had to compress them a bit in PS into jpeg so this site can handle it lol. Still turned out alright aren't they?
@DragonfireXZ95: that resolution isnt NEARLY high enough to not be an ugly, jaggy mess. Also, injectable post process aa like those in reshade and sweetfx are absolute shit and dont help at all in motion. My gm200 at 1500/7800 is as fast as it gets without LN cooling so i know exactly how far tomb raider can be pushed. Theres no way to fix the aliasing without making the game unplayable or turning everything to low
Just watch any UC4 gameplay on YT since you obviously don't have a PS4, do you always see a hud? Huh FOOL? Do YA? Oh does that mean the gameplay is all prerendered now? You are so desperate to downplay UC4's graphics you are an utter laughing stock .
@gpuking: Yea, they look good. I know if you upload straight from screenshare they look compressed as shit. That's usually the pics herms pull and then argue that's how it actually looks.
@gpuking: Yea, they look good. I know if you upload straight from screenshare they look compressed as shit. That's usually the pics herms pull and then argue that's how it actually looks.
Pale screen shots that strip one game impressive lighting make for better argument against another game. Anything that remotely gets close to what you see on your tv is not a good argument. That is the nature of these threads for the most part. Its my screenshot comparison is more valid then yours.
Log in to comment