Titanfall looks alright, but lets not act like...

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Lambent7"] Pretty much what this guy said. Titanfall is all flash and no substance. BF4 has both and then some.Lambent7

How is it all flash, when its clear they are focusing more on gameplay and balance than they are pretty graphics.

Also, since when did having non destructable environments automatically equal bad? Battlefield 3 has barely any destructable assets except for a few walls here and there, yet the game is still awesome.

You've played TitanFall?

The difference between this and Killzone is that Killzone has never been good. KZ2 was fun online for a week, but it got boring. KZ3 just LOL.

Whereas these guys developing TitanFall created CoD2 with its awesome online, CoD4MW which was a gamechanger in online multiplayer. They create games that do keep people interested. 6 years on, and CoD is still the most played online multiplayer game, and its all based on the foundation these guys created.

Yeah, I do think they're trying something different, is that a bad thing now? They're creating something even faster than CoD, with interesting weapons, large scale maps, AI characters and story elements weaved in through the multiplayer.

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

TitanFall has large enviroments. Loads of tall buildings to scale, and space to accomodate Titans. See those huge warships flying over the map? You can even get yourself on one of those and try and take it out.

The Titans are not vehicles. They are exoskeletons that are available to every player. You can't jump in another persons Titan, so its not the same as just vehicles on a map.

And no, nothing like TitanFall has been done before. You can list 10 games that do aspects of what TitanFall does, but you can't list one that does it all.

Try harder :cool:

RR360DD

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] non destructible environments, static lighting, poor physics, terrible facial animations(remember the girl in the pink with the blocky face LOL) struggles to run a Source Engine game at 60 fps etc etc XboxStache

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

[QUOTE="XboxStache"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

MonsieurX

with interesting weaponsRR360DD

large scale mapsRR360DD

AI characters and story elements weaved in through the multiplayer.RR360DD

Seems like it'll be good fun. Should look and play nice on a good PC.

Seems like it'll be good fun. Should look and play nice on a good PC.

Doom_HellKnight

[QUOTE="RR360DD"] Guns that shoot bullets pew pew pew. [QUOTE="RR360DD"]large scale mapsLambent7

AI characters and story elements weaved in through the multiplayer.RR360DD

I didn't say faster equaled better, I said they are developing something even faster. Thats the direction they are taking this game. And no, your ignorance is astounding. The only aspects this shares with CoD is maybe some UI elements like the mini map.

Interesting weapons such as the ability to stop bullets in their path, turn them around and fire them back. Electricity guns. Smart pistols that have the ability to lock onto multiple pilots heads. Data knifes that you can use to hack AI's into joining you.

They are large scale. Not as large as the Battlefield maps because this isn't that sort of game. This is 7 v 7 at the minute, not 32 v 32. But large in the sense that they accomodate Titans as well as pilots. The levels are very vertical too as pilots are extremely agile. The huge warships floating above are part of the map as well. You can get on them and take them out. Just because the maps arent as big a caspain border doesn't make them bad. Thats as stupid an argument as people who think having more players equals a better game.

Destiny and the Division are like your bog standard single player games that are set in large open worlds, but now online. They are predominantly co-op based with some PvP elements. Absolutely nothing like Battlefield or TitanFall, which are pure competitive multiplayer. So why did you bring them up?

You were saying? :cool:

RR360DD

"Best PC Game"

Yup.

TitanFall has large enviroments. Loads of tall buildings to scale, and space to accomodate Titans. See those huge warships flying over the map? You can even get yourself on one of those and try and take it out.

The Titans are not vehicles. They are exoskeletons that are available to every player. You can't jump in another persons Titan, so its not the same as just vehicles on a map.

And no, nothing like TitanFall has been done before. You can list 10 games that do aspects of what TitanFall does, but you can't list one that does it all.

Try harder :cool:

RR360DD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unrzhMt17kU

Interesting weapons such as the ability to stop bullets in their path, turn them around and fire them back. Electricity guns. Smart pistols that have the ability to lock onto multiple pilots heads. Data knifes that you can use to hack AI's into joining you.RR360DD

They are large scale. Not as large as the Battlefield maps because this isn't that sort of game. This is 7 v 7 at the minute, not 32 v 32. But large in the sense that they accommodate Titans as well as pilots. The levels are very vertical too as pilots are extremely agile. The huge warships floating above are part of the map as well. You can get on them and take them out. Just because the maps aren't as big a caspain border doesn't make them bad. Thats as stupid an argument as people who think having more players equals a better game.RR360DD

Destiny and the Division are like your bog standard single player games that are set in large open worlds, but now online. They are predominantly co-op based with some PvP elements. Absolutely nothing like Battlefield or TitanFall, which are pure competitive multiplayer. So why did you bring them up?RR360DD

[QUOTE="XboxStache"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

MonsieurX

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

TitanFall has large enviroments. Loads of tall buildings to scale, and space to accomodate Titans. See those huge warships flying over the map? You can even get yourself on one of those and try and take it out.

The Titans are not vehicles. They are exoskeletons that are available to every player. You can't jump in another persons Titan, so its not the same as just vehicles on a map.

And no, nothing like TitanFall has been done before. You can list 10 games that do aspects of what TitanFall does, but you can't list one that does it all.

Try harder :cool:

dvalo9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unrzhMt17kU

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

You were saying? :cool:

SchnabbleTab

"Best PC Game"

Yup.

Whoever these critics are, they sure have low standards :lol:. Best PC game???? :lol:

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="XboxStache"] Exactly. COWS are just randomly pulling statements out of their asses. Personally, I was blown away by Titanfall. It looked amazing. I'm glad the devs didn't focus on "facial animations" when they're going to deliver a unique gameplay experience. :) XboxStache

If I was an X1 fan I wouldn't brag to much about Titanfall. There's a posbility that it can come to the PS4. Its not even being published by MS studios but EA. Remember what happened to ME 2? All I'm saying is you X1 fans shouldn't brag to much about it as an exclusive...

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

and yet people didnt even care about it, didnt even make it to the finalls

BlackShirt20

So we get the best critics choice all to ourselves and the better version of Watch Dogs!

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] non destructible environments, static lighting, poor physics, terrible facial animations(remember the girl in the pink with the blocky face LOL) struggles to run a Source Engine game at 60 fps etc etc XboxStache

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

Since when did E3 awards really matter? Last time I checked "The Last Flop" as you say got similar awards and it still "flopped" in your eyes right. Lets not kid ourselves here.Lambent7

They dont matter.

Its about advertising dollars. Titanfall is a huge advertising juggernaut, no magazine or website wants to miss out on huge advertising dollars because that is what keeps them in business. Microsoft and EA are backing this game, that means there will be a lot of money thrown around to advertise it and gaming publications are in business to make money.

Its obvious microsofts money affects opinions because the developers themselves even went as far as to discredit their own PC version in favor of the xb1 version. That only shows respawn was bought by microsoft if they are willing to say their PC version is inferior.

I tend to not worry about what people who do reviews and are paid primarily by the very people who make those games. Hell hudson hawk was a horribly rated movie back in its day but I still watch it sometimes even now because I think its a fun movie and it makes me laugh, I dont really care what anyone else thinks.

TitanFall has large enviroments. Loads of tall buildings to scale, and space to accomodate Titans. See those huge warships flying over the map? You can even get yourself on one of those and try and take it out.

The Titans are not vehicles. They are exoskeletons that are available to every player. You can't jump in another persons Titan, so its not the same as just vehicles on a map.

And no, nothing like TitanFall has been done before. You can list 10 games that do aspects of what TitanFall does, but you can't list one that does it all.

Try harder :cool:

RR360DD

not sure if xbox 360 version or what...?

[QUOTE="XboxStache"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Poor physics? talking out your ass

Don't care about facial animations, its an online multiplayer game. Not some superficial Killzone clone that only garners attention through flashy graphics LOL

Also, E3 demo was a steady 100% 60FPS :cool:

xboxiphoneps3

[QUOTE="XboxStache"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"] E3 demo was running on a PC :lol:Granny_Spanked

Oh gawd if that all you can see in terms of similarities between COD and TF...then dude there nooo point in talking with someone like you. Obviously blind in all regard. Data Knives are probably the coolest things that you mentioned, but the concept still isn't anything special or different. Apart from that nothing new really to the point it should be praised over other games. At this point actually good gun variety should be a standard instead of something people hope for. I don't know why this is something that's strongly separates it from other games. [QUOTE="RR360DD"]They are large scale. Not as large as the Battlefield maps because this isn't that sort of game. This is 7 v 7 at the minute, not 32 v 32. But large in the sense that they accommodate Titans as well as pilots. The levels are very vertical too as pilots are extremely agile. The huge warships floating above are part of the map as well. You can get on them and take them out. Just because the maps aren't as big a caspain border doesn't make them bad. Thats as stupid an argument as people who think having more players equals a better game.Lambent7

Destiny and the Division are like your bog standard single player games that are set in large open worlds, but now online. They are predominantly co-op based with some PvP elements. Absolutely nothing like Battlefield or TitanFall, which are pure competitive multiplayer. So why did you bring them up?RR360DD

Okay, go tell me the similarities between TitanFall and CoD. And nothing stupid like they both have guns or they're both multiplayer. I want justification for people calling it a CoD clone.

I mentioned those guns to show this isn't just another military shooter with real guns like some have claimed. Yeah, it still has pistols, SMGs, Assasult Rifles etc. but this is a sci-fi title and there is futuristic weaponry in there too. I'm not saying it separates it from other titles, I'm saying it separates it from CoD!

Yeah I know its less. In an interview with Respawn, they said they've had all kinds of numbers playing it. At the minute they've settled on 7 v 7 because it feels right and balanced. Bearing in mind there is AI on the maps as well. I love Battlefield games, I still play 3 daily but some of the most fun I've ever had online was in double team in Halo 2, and thats 2 v 2. So i'm not about to fall for this more players is better crap. If a game is well designed around 4 v 4 or 7 v 7 or whatever, its just as fun as a game well designed around 32 v 32. It doesn't take anything away from the game.

And thats not what I meant when I said bog standard. I meant they are open world single player games but now online and connected that you play with friends. Like Borderlands 2, but with more ambitious online plans. I'm really looking forward to Destiny, but I still don't know why you brought it up because its nothing like Battlefield or TitanFall. TitanFall is a competitive multiplayer game. Its not trying to be a large scale MMO at all, so I don't know where you are getting those vibes.

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"][QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]sweet! Watch Dogs won viewers choice! Watch Dog Developers say the best platform to play it is on a Xbox One.

 

So we get the best critics choice all to ourselves and the better version of Watch Dogs!

 

Krelian-co

you know lem logic, da cloud, 20 xbox one of power, it will make better graphics dan 2 titan on sli!! :lol:

i wonder how are they so dumb to think that with their gimped hardware they will have the better version, xbone is the weaker of the 3 systems it will be released.

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] and that is why they showed it on a PS4 and not a Xbox One right? They want the game to actually look next gen not a semi upgrade from the 360, so thats why they didnt show any gameplay off the Xbox 1Murderstyle75

you know lem logic, da cloud, 20 xbox one of power, it will make better graphics dan 2 titan on sli!! :lol:

i wonder how are they so dumb to think that with their gimped hardware they will have the better version, xbone is the weaker of the 3 systems it will be released.

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

you know lem logic, da cloud, 20 xbox one of power, it will make better graphics dan 2 titan on sli!! :lol:

i wonder how are they so dumb to think that with their gimped hardware they will have the better version, xbone is the weaker of the 3 systems it will be released.

Krelian-co

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

game wouldnt suck as bad if the mechs could actually fly like the pilots so they could fly on top of a building and crush the shit out of the noobs camping on them.

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] If they are right, that would mean their Internet is faster than the federal governments.RR360DD

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

Murderstyle75

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

No extended warrantly or free repair for the PS2 either, I went through 2 of them.

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

RR360DD

No extended warrantly or free repair for the PS2 either, I went through 2 of them.

Titanflop will be just like Skywardflop, IT IS INEVITABLE!

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] While I'm the biggest Original Xbox fanboy in the world, the console had a serious problem that was dusted under the rug. No extended warranty, no free repair, just switched drive manufacturers while always denying there was a problem. Do a search for the Xbox Thomson drive and you will see what I mean.Murderstyle75

No extended warrantly or free repair for the PS2 either, I went through 2 of them.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] non destructible environments, static lighting, poor physics, terrible facial animations(remember the girl in the pink with the blocky face LOL) struggles to run a Source Engine game at 60 fps etc etc xboxiphoneps3

and it still beat out all those PS4 games, how sad

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

No extended warrantly or free repair for the PS2 either, I went through 2 of them.

RR360DD

Nothing will have better MP than BF4 :).

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] If they are right, that would mean their Internet is faster than the federal governments.RR360DD

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

and ps3 is more reliable than x360, your point being? this time they used low end parts in the xbone.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

microsoft cant make a decent xbox with decent hardware, only low end parts in it and somehow they think microsoft will be using supercomputers for theh clouddddddd. lem logic :lol:

Krelian-co

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

and ps3 is more reliable than x360, your point being? this time they used low end parts in the xbone.

Point being they did make decent hardware.

Owned :cool:

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Original Xbox was more reliable than the PS2 :lol: Try harder.

RR360DD

and ps3 is more reliable than x360, your point being? this time they used low end parts in the xbone.

Point being they did make decent hardware.

Owned :cool:

as clearly shown by the rrod fiasco, reliable hardware indeed.

i would say owned, but thats like the normal rule in every thread you argue with me, but hey enjoy playing with your low end graphics card, dat underclocked low end 7750 awesomeness :lol:

is this a x360 in game screen shot? 

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Point being they did make decent hardware.

Owned :cool:

AncientDozer

as clearly shown by the rrod fiasco, reliable hardware indeed.

i would say owned, but thats like the normal rule in every thread you argue with me, but hey enjoy playing with your low end graphics card, dat underclocked low end 7750 awesomeness :lol:

nope try harder, my argumnent was around they didnt use decent parts for the console, only low end parts as proved by the low end 7750 underclocked, somehow the village idiot aka rrod360 thought i was talking about reliability and ignored the millions of rrod x360 and came back with a stupid reply. 

vs

yup... falling skyscrapers are definitely better than jumping on a mech