Star Wars: Battlefront 4K Screenshots

What is one thing that FromSoftware is notoriously known for? They don't optimize their games for shit, they couldn't even maintain 30 FPS on the PlayStation 4, and with how ugly the game is compared to its performance its clear it should have been getting considerably more... Which is exactly why I said...

You wanted FROMSOFT to optimize?

@silversix_ said:

@nyadc said:

@silversix_ said:

@nyadc said:

It shares a lot of visual similarities with Halo 4 and Destiny no doubt but if you actually start looking around it's considerably more advanced and the scale is much larger. All around the beta was a 720p stress test on an unfinished game and the media for Halo 5 hasn't exactly been forthcoming, we need to wait and see.

and so is BB compared to other Souls games, much more detailed. Textures may not be 'next gen' but saying that it'll run easily on a 10y old console when a ps4 had trouble is just dreaming.

What is one thing that FromSoftware is notoriously known for? They don't optimize their games for shit, they couldn't even maintain 30 FPS on the PlayStation 4, and with how ugly the game is compared to its performance its clear it should have been getting considerably more... Which is exactly why I said...

@nyadc said:

If Bloodborne were 720p I have no doubt it could run on a 360/PS3 perfectly fine if optimized.

You wanted FROMSOFT to actually optimize?

Insane concept right?

Not for you though.

You're a fakeboy.

@mr_huggles_dog :

I'm glad you agree.

That's nice. I don't feel like paying $70 CAD for a multiplayer-only game with four maps and a whole host of unannounced DLC over the horizon.

let's change the scenery from desert to glacial landscape

Damn this game looks amazing. Haven't played a shooter in years but am planning on getting this day one and sinking 100's of hours into it!

A 295x2 is $600-700, and has been on sale for $550 or less pretty often. Stop calling it a $1000 card. It isn't.

too bad it's mp only

i have no interest in this

All I know is I should be averaging about 100 FPS in this game at 2560x1440 on Ultra settings, very much looking forward to it.

Though nice, but it is going to be another few years before 4k is even considered a standard.. Less than 1% of the pc gaming population even have a 4k monitor/the hardware to push good fps for it.. Furthermore as a pc gamer I honestly don't care much for 4k what so ever, I honestly think Nvidia/ati 3d or VR headsets to be more desirable push forward in visuals than jamming more pixels on a screen.. That's just me though.

I thought it had 11 maps.

I gave links.

It is.

The Titan X is a $1000 card, not the 295.

Again...I googled it and on Amazon...it was $850 on sale.

It is.

You didn't google hard enough then!

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150710

Quiet little boy.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?N=100007709%20600494826&IsNodeId=1&Submit=ENE

And here is a price tracker for the xfx, where it shows that it has been $550 multiple times http://pcpartpicker.com/part/xfx-video-card-r9295x8qfa

Oh wonderful.

$700 on 2 year old tech. Thats your compromised solution to getting 4K in Battlefront/Battlefield?

I already addressed this.

That 2 year old card can keep up with the likes of th4 Titan X. Stop talking, its clear you don't know what you talking about.

It's actually more powerful than the Titan X in 9/10 cases, considerably so. Refer to the 290X Crossfire benchmarks for reference.

http://www.babeltechreviews.com/community/showthread.php?tid=179

Again....you're still spending $700 on the GPU alone.

I'm not sure what part of "most PC gamers don't have a $700 GPU"....

....you don't fucking understand.

Stop talking....this is starting to get fucking ridiculous.

And? You are trying to run in the game in 4K, that is something mid range cards can't do so of course you'll be paying a premium for hardware. I seriously don't understand why you are even making this a thing. Its $700, yes its expensive but as I said if you are looking to run the latest games at 4K then you need the hardware and that hardware is not cheap.

• GPU: $550
• CPU: $210
• Motherboard: $110
• RAM: $80
• Case: $60
• PSU: $120
• Mouse: $50
• Keyboard: $50
• Headset $50
• SSD/HDD: $70
• 4K Monitor: $500
• Total: $1850

Being this dumb.

• Priceless

Infinitely more interesting than battlefields setting that's for sure. I'd love to see a wartorn coruscant or something also.

I'm not telling you what to spend your money on....thats your business.

But parading screens around as if a laptop from Walmart is going to get those screens is bullshit.

Theres never this discussion about such screens b/c you fucking hermits all group together and tear down anyone who mentions it...like a pack of nerd dogs.

It's a FACT: many PC gamers won't get those visuals.

With all the meta rule bullshit on this forum there should have to be a disclaimer when posting PC screens that say "MAY REQUIRE A FUCKING SECOND JOB AND NO LIFE TO AFFORD THESE SCREENS".

@nyadc: "Bu bu teh dollarz"

I seriously don't understand why he makes those comments. We all know that PC gaming on the bleeding edge is expensive. So what if only 4% of gamers will be playing in 4K, the rest of the population will be enjoying it at 1080p or at 2560x1440 or whatever.

Quit your bitching. Why do you care that some players will not be playing in 4K? The OP doesn't say anything about Wal-mart laptops so that is something you are putting in there.

Fact of the matter is, there are people out there who will be playing the game at that res and with ultra settings on. And whats with that "need a second job" bullshit?

@clyde46: Am I taking crazy pills here? You asked why I care....and I answered you.

Don't be a sore loser and be all "LOL QUIT BITCHING LMAOBBQ I'M AWESOME1!!!"

I was exaggerating....by about $500.

So I was on the money...thanks for proving me right.

I'm sure many of those parts are at their very cheapest...ever...which will not always happen. So $2000.....yup, I was right.

I'm amazed at how fast ppl become too cool and forget their on a forum called SYSTEM WARS.

As if ppl aren't going to pick at everything about other systems.

Fucking too amazing cool guys here.

Tomorrow they'll be in a PS4 thread going "LOL CONSOLES 30FPS 1080P!!!!"

@mr_huggles_dog: I'm not the one who's sore here, its you who keeps crying that you need a $2500 PC and a second job to play this at 4K,

The argument you are using the same tired argument that has been doing the rounds for years. We know that PC gaming is expensive... We also know that consoles are struggling and have to choose between 1080p and 60FPS.

@mr_huggles_dog: You are the very definition of a person who can't admit that what they say is dumb or admit when they are proven wrong.

Well all that butthurt gave me some lulz.

Lemme guess.

I'm the one that's butthurt, right?

@clyde46: And both parties do their fair share of picking.

Don't act like I'm some sort of gaming weirdo for bringing it up when every thread by -God- and other hermits are "LOLCONSOLES".

Don't be a bigot.

@mr_huggles_dog: Nope, I meant it as a general statement about what the thread turned into.

Janker or God or whatever alt he's using now is highly annoying I agree, he uses the same material over and over again in thread after thread. As for the "lolconsoles" thing, it was funny for the first year when we were promised everything under the sun then came the back tracking but now its just the normal. We all know what these machines are capable of, the trick with this place, don't let it get to you.

it won't have a single player campaign, but it will likely have single player modes. If it has a galactic conquest mode like in the original games that would be just fine by me.

same goes for every console game :P

That s a drag. If my friends buy it, so will I.

Lol @ the dumbasses fighting over 4K 100+FPS gameplay of this game. I'll just get it on my console at a blurry 1080P and 60FPS and have a more cinematic experience with the game..

Every time I see someone **** and whine about Battlefront not having SP......it's like how fraking dumb are you!?

Battlefront's (1 and 2) version of "SP" was basically a match vs bots, if I want a fps Star Wars game I'll replay Republic Commando or wait tell w/e they decide to revive that series.

Far More than the number of PS4 gamers, as Nvidia/ATI sales numbers suggest.

I don't post much in system wars but the @mr_huggles_dog meltdown is hilarious.

Yeah, specially after he owned those like God who doesnt even have a gaming PC..lolz

lmao @ the cranler meltdown

has been proven wrong so many times and keeps on changing the subject

I'll give you respect if you explain to me how I changed the subject.

Could've sworn the whole time I was saying not many ppl will experience the game like it's being advertised in this thread. Nydac, God, and Clyde might want to use distracting tactics like how $700 isn't the same as $1000.

But whatever....I didn't spend my 4th arguing with jackasses like N64DD who claim to know whats going on. I'm not sure if theres really any credit to the whole "Huggles had a meltdown" thing now.

Great to see you own people with facts and undeniable, rock solid logic.