Star Wars: Battlefront 4K Screenshots

  • 190 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts

Update : Star Wars Battlefront Closed Alpha Hoth Multiplayer 4K Ultra Settings Screens

see the rest here

it's a shame this game has no single-player campaign

source

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#2 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

Those pics are fucking gorgeous.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#3 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

Yeah that looks pretty damn good, 2560x1440, 144 FPS here I come!

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#4 tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#6 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@tushar172787 said:

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Here's one upset cow for you.

@mr_huggles_dog said:

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58642 Posts

No single player and trying to charge £49.99.

Shocking.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@nyadc said:
@tushar172787 said:

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Here's one upset cow for you.

@mr_huggles_dog said:

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Jokes on you.

I'm not a cow.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26641 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@tushar172787 said:

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Here's one upset cow for you.

@mr_huggles_dog said:

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Jokes on you.

I'm not a cow.

The 660 GTX in my streaming computer can basically max out Battlefield 4. Chances are, a 960 GTX will near max this game out at 1080p. It's a 200 dollar card. You could build a 600 dollar system that could produce those graphics.

If you aren't a Cow, you sure are ignorant of the Frostbite engine and PC components.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17637 Posts

I'm sorry, but I don't buy what a game will look like until it's released.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26641 Posts

@MirkoS77: Those are pre-alpha screen shots. Those are actually what the game looks like from a person with closed alpha access. Those are not dev screenshots.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@tushar172787 said:

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Here's one upset cow for you.

@mr_huggles_dog said:

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Jokes on you.

I'm not a cow.

The 660 GTX in my streaming computer can basically max out Battlefield 4. Chances are, a 960 GTX will near max this game out at 1080p. It's a 200 dollar card. You could build a 600 dollar system that could produce those graphics.

If you aren't a Cow, you sure are ignorant of the Frostbite engine and PC components.

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

Edit: Just so you know....b/c obviously you don't....a TITAN is the only GPU that can run 4K at "DECENT" frames....and they cost $1000.

In FC4 a TITAN ran that game at like 55fps.

So yeah....unless games are going backwards in graphical quality....don't act so superior in knowledge.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#14 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

45992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 45992 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog: Got any evidence to bak that up? Frostbite is a really well optimized engine. Lots of people play BF4 at 4k pr downsampled.

Avatar image for crashnburn281
CrashNBurn281

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#16  Edited By CrashNBurn281
Member since 2014 • 1574 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@tushar172787 said:

@the_master_race: quote all the cows in here and tell them it's loads better than UC..

Here's one upset cow for you.

@mr_huggles_dog said:

*DISCLAIMER - SCREENS SHOWN REQUIRE $2500 PC GAMING RIG*

So 4% of the PC gaming community will see that game look like that.

Nice generalization though.

Jokes on you.

I'm not a cow.

LMAO, sure. At least hav e the balls to admit what you are.

Avatar image for playharderfool
playharderfool

2085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By playharderfool
Member since 2009 • 2085 Posts

Game looses something in screen shots, best seen in motion but clearly one of the best looking up coming games of the generation.

lol and whats with lemmings hiding behind PC to take shots at PS4's UC4 for in here? You guys are a sad jealous bunch of goofs. You guys try to turn any thread into an attempt to justify your feverish loyalty toward all things xbox and damage control against PS4.

Let me just say that if anything games to be compared and bashed against SWBF it's another FPS and since Halo 5 releases this holiday it's sad to see it looks 2 gens behind this in comparison but coming out at the same time.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#18 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html

So yeah....thats Last Light and with 2 GTX 980 running in SLI ( which are around $600 each......so $1200) only getting the 70fps.

Don't bullshit me.

You boobs can sit down now.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#19 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@crashnburn281: You're a lemming....you don't know shit.

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#20 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?

What a huge surprise...

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17637 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

@MirkoS77: Those are pre-alpha screen shots. Those are actually what the game looks like from a person with closed alpha access. Those are not dev screenshots.

Ok. Just after all these downgrade controversies, hard to know what to trust.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?

What a huge surprise...

1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.

2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#23 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?

What a huge surprise...

1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.

2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.

Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.

If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?

What a huge surprise...

1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.

2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.

Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.

If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.

Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.

I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html

And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html

Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running 4K at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.

You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.

Sit down Nydac....you're out of your league.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog: so? Every PC thread you jump in with "only X can play this, £2500 rig required ".

It will look like that on my PC so that's all that matters.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#26  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:

Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.

I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html

And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html

Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.

You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.

Sit down Nydac....you're out of your league.

Yeah, you're not too smart... I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra... Stick to what you know, which is **** all about computers...

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2014/04/08/amd_radeon_r9_295x2_video_card_review/3#.VZZTIUZUUuc

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2013/11/27/battlefield-4-performance-analysis/6

P.S. Where's that 3DMark score champ?

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@mr_huggles_dog: so? Every PC thread you jump in with "only X can play this, £2500 rig required ".

It will look like that on my PC so that's all that matters.

Every Sony thread you guys jump in with "PS4 sucks".

Lots of ppl are enjoying their PS4s.....thats all that matters.

So suck it up and stop bitching.

Edit: also b/c the level of misdirection with these "LOOK AT HOW AWESOME PC IS....4K RESOLUTION BABEH!!!!" threads is insulting.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#29 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:

@nyadc: Are you fucking retarded?

The average fps on the top card is 49fps on YOUR provided benchmark.

Are you fucking kidding me. Dude...just shut the **** up.

No but you sure as hell are because you know nothing about computers... Crossfire.... derpity, derp, derp DERPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#31  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

@nyadc: Are you fucking retarded?

The average fps on the top card is 49fps on YOUR provided benchmark.

Are you fucking kidding me. Dude...just shut the **** up.

No but you sure as hell are because you know nothing about computers... Crossfire.... derpity, derp, derp DERPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

You're such a dumbass.

I barely keep up with components anymore and I know more than you.

THE 295X2.....IS A FUCKING $1000 CARD.

Thanks for proving my point.

A 295X2 is two 290X's slapped onto a single PCB, I have two 290X's which costs a little more than $600, do the math rocket scientist.

P.S. I got both of my cards for under $400.

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#32  Edited By The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@the_master_race: still doesn't excuse the lack of content

Avatar image for kinectthedots
kinectthedots

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By kinectthedots
Member since 2013 • 3383 Posts

Why are people arguing here?

The point is, if some are already able to get this running at 4k it means a lot of PC players will be able to play at 1080p at 60fps with the same graphics which is awesome.

PS4 should be able to play 1080p at 30fps and not loose too much on the gfx end which is also good.

xbone...should be able to load the game and run it in some form. lol

See everyone wins.

Correction:

Sorry Wii U

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

@nyadc: Are you fucking retarded?

The average fps on the top card is 49fps on YOUR provided benchmark.

Are you fucking kidding me. Dude...just shut the **** up.

No but you sure as hell are because you know nothing about computers... Crossfire.... derpity, derp, derp DERPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

You're such a dumbass.

I barely keep up with components anymore and I know more than you.

THE 295X2.....IS A FUCKING $1000 CARD.

Thanks for proving my point.

A 295X2 is two 290X's slapped onto a single PCB, I have two 290X's which costs a little more than $600, do the math rocket scientist.

P.S. I got both of my cards for under $400.

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#35  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get nearly 70 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering... Why are you being difficult...

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts
@The_Last_Ride said:

@the_master_race: still doesn't excuse the lack of content

agreed , most of AAA games of this generation are suffering from lack of content ....

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#37 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#38 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121922&cm_re=290x-_-14-121-922-_-Produc

Avatar image for lglz1337
lglz1337

4959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#39  Edited By lglz1337
Member since 2013 • 4959 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog: LMAO, so true!

Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

I paid $550 for my 295x2

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#41  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@SamiRDuran said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

I paid $550 for my 295x2

Rekt.... Again.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#42 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121922&cm_re=290x-_-14-121-922-_-Produc

Thats not a 295x2. At least thats not what it says. It says 295X.....with no 2. Crossfire ready means it can support another card.

Derpity derp dumb....rekt and all that stupid shit.

@SamiRDuran said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

I paid $550 for my 295x2

I paid $2 for my PS4.

Did I do it right?

Did I rekt somebody?

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#43 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@the_master_race said:
@The_Last_Ride said:

@the_master_race: still doesn't excuse the lack of content

agreed , most of AAA games of this generation are suffering from lack of content ....

Still strange that many of them get good ratings

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#44 NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121922&cm_re=290x-_-14-121-922-_-Produc

Thats not a 295x2. At least thats not what it says. It says 295X.....with no 2. Crossfire ready means it can support another card.

Derpity derp dumb....rekt and all that stupid shit.

Are you fucking kidding me, no one can be this out of touch with reality... I've already explain this to you..

295X2 = Two 290X's on one PCB

290X = $269 x 2 = $539 = 295X2

My god in heaven...

Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45  Edited By SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121922&cm_re=290x-_-14-121-922-_-Produc

Thats not a 295x2. At least thats not what it says. It says 295X.....with no 2. Crossfire ready means it can support another card.

Derpity derp dumb....rekt and all that stupid shit.

@SamiRDuran said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

I paid $550 for my 295x2

I paid $2 for my PS4.

Did I do it right?

Did I rekt somebody?

Whats your point with crossfire you can have up to 4 of any similar cards. You'll be surprised with the deals you can find if you shop around with a bit of patience. Building a pc is not about going to amazon and throwing your money at them. Anyway, I dont even know what you're trying to prove here, are you trying to imply rich pc gamers should feel bad? I can assure you they feel anything but that. 4k is becoming more affordable to pc gamers with every passing day while console gamers will not get to experience it for at least 10 more years. Life is way too short to wait 10 years for anything that you can have right now.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46  Edited By RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I guess we'll see....since you're just as ignorant of how this isn't BF4 version of the Frostbite engine.

It's Frostbite 3... derp...

They can make changes to it and still have it be Frostbite 3.

Derp.

Got any evidence to show that suggests that they did? Oh you don't?

What a huge surprise...

1. So you think they like to keep their engines stagnant? As in they never make any advancements to their engines? Thats pretty fucking stupid.

2. It was said on these boards...maybe you weren't around yet, I know you're still sorta new around here and ignorant and childish....but it was said they were using that photo scan technique with this game....which might not warrant enough difference to change it from FB3 to FB4 or something....but it's still a change.

Yes engines get advanced and things do change, but there is absolutely nothing in the footage or screen shots of this game to suggest that performance will be adversely affected, or affected in such a way that it would greatly differ from Battlefield 4.

If you can run Battlefield 4 optimally you can run this game.

Hence the post I made about the GPUs running Last Light at 4K.

I'm sure you mistakenly looked over it....so I'll post it here for you: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/05-Metro-Last-Light-2160p,3668.html

And just for good measure...heres the 4K results for BF4: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2015-vga-charts/17-Battlefield-4-2160p,3680.html

Thats with 2 TITAN BLACK cards....which are around $1000 each....running 4K at 125fps.........on MEDIUM settings.

You can't run BF4 optimally at 4K unless you have an ludicrously expensive rig....which was my original point.

Sit down Nydac....you're out of your league.

I can run BF4 at 4k just fine at ultra settings or whatever is the highest.

I have 2 970s which cost me a little over 600USD for both of them together when I got them last year at release.

Also a 980ti is only a few percent weaker than a Titan X and costs 650USD.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#47  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:
@nyadc said:
@mr_huggles_dog said:

I just looked up that card....and the prices were anywhere from $850 (on sale) to over $1000.

You don't have to explain elementary stuff just to look like you're not ignorant.

http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-PCI-Express-Graphics-21234-00-40G/dp/B00JS8JRHW

Do you have no higher brain function? Do you not understand that the performance figures for a 295X2 are the same as two 290X's (far less expensive) and vise versa? What are you not getting about this?

What are you not getting about I can get over 60 FPS average in Battlefield 4 @ 4K on Ultra settings on two cards that you can buy right now for $539 for the pair... Why is this not registering...

That I provided a link to that card for $850 (the low end of the price) and you have not.

Such a high functioning brain like yours should surely have noticed that little problem.

Sold out currently but it's $269 a card when they come back in stock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121922&cm_re=290x-_-14-121-922-_-Produc

Thats not a 295x2. At least thats not what it says. It says 295X.....with no 2. Crossfire ready means it can support another card.

Derpity derp dumb....rekt and all that stupid shit.

Are you fucking kidding me, no one can be this out of touch with reality... I've already explain this to you..

295X2 = Two 290X's on one PCB

290X = $269 x 2 = $539 = 295X2

My god in heaven...

Jesus....this was like pulling teeth.

It's not the same.

They aren't the same in price match up.

A 295x2 is a $1000 card genius. 2 290x by themselves can be bought for $600 IF FOUND ON SALE.

Jesus....maybe if you explained this shit better. First you show me a 295x2...then you link me a 290x and are like "SEE REKT". The ****? They aren't the same card..and expect me to follow you stupid "in your own mind" way of explaining shit.

Either way....you STILL need $600 GPUs which is last gen so yeah...thats fucking great now that the 300 series is either out or about to come out.

Good job...you need to spend $600 on a set of GPUs which aren't even the latest tech.

What a fucking blast it is to play at 4K on PC....this was all such a well oiled machine.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#48  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

Just to put this whole stupid conversation....if you can call it that....into perspective:

Nydac this is the equivalent of what you just did:

ME - PS4 can do Watchdogs in 1080p and only cost $400

YOU - no

ME - *links benchmark of PS4 Watchdogs*

YOU - it's still $400

ME - *links a PS3*

YOU - thats not the same console

ME - OMG 2 PS3's ARE THE SAME AS 1 PS4 JUST NOT IN PRICE OR MODEL NUMBER.....JESUS NO ONE GETS ME1!!!!!!!!1111

Fucking ridiculous man.

Avatar image for nyadc
NyaDC

8006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#50  Edited By NyaDC
Member since 2014 • 8006 Posts
@mr_huggles_dog said:

Jesus....this was like pulling teeth.

It's not the same.

They aren't the same in price match up.

A 295x2 is a $1000 card genius. 2 290x by themselves can be bought for $600 IF FOUND ON SALE.

Jesus....maybe if you explained this shit better. First you show me a 295x2...then you link me a 290x and are like "SEE REKT". The ****? They aren't the same card..and expect me to follow you stupid "in your own mind" way of explaining shit.

Either way....you STILL need $600 GPUs which is last gen so yeah...thats fucking great now that the 300 series is either out or about to come out.

Good job...you need to spend $600 on a set of GPUs which aren't even the latest tech.

What a fucking blast it is to play at 4K on PC....this was all such a well oiled machine.

Don't get all butthurt because you can't understand extremely simple things, it's plain to see your PC experience is nill and you're a console gamer from top to bottom trying to discuss things completely out of your realm of understanding. My PC specs are in my signature for christ sakes, any PC gamer would have looked at what I posted and said "yeah you're right, you could.".... I mean how much more obvious did things need to be?

I posted the results of a 295X2 which was getting 69.8 FPS on Ultra settings at 4K, any PC gamer would know a 295X2 is two 290X's on a single PCB. I posted the results from a 290X which was getting 37 FPS average. I said "I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra.", I have two 290X's which is clear as day in my forum signature and has been, this isn't advanced physics huggles... I mean holy shit man, talking to you is like talking to an inanimate object, stop getting involved in PC discussions, you don't have a clue what in the hell you're talking about and are a pure annoyance...

@nyadc said:

Yeah, you're not too smart... I could run this game at 60+ FPS with a 4K resolution on Ultra... Stick to what you know, which is **** all about computers...

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2014/04/08/amd_radeon_r9_295x2_video_card_review/3#.VZZTIUZUUuc

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2013/11/27/battlefield-4-performance-analysis/6

P.S. Where's that 3DMark score champ?