Sony makes Nintendo & Microsoft studios look like they're artistically bankrupt. The lack of talent is obvious

@techhog89: ??? That's all you have. Nintendo stopped releasing games, and set themselves on auto-pilot years ago.

@hardwenzen: show me where I said the gameplay is just ok. You’re making shit up. And call me lost? Lmfao

Your first post. You're obviously not considering it on the 94 metacritic level. So, i will respond the same way as you do. Your taste in the gameplay is subjective🥴

@hardwenzen: oh I’m well aware it’s all subjective. It’s entertainment.

But you’re putting words in my posts that I never said. You fail.

I never fail. I own a Playstation 5.

@hardwenzen:

Pokémon S/V is ugly as a bums butthole but you can interact with all that flat, ugly geometry yvista's.

In GOWR all you can do is look at pretty vistas. In S/V you can climb them. Or glide off them.

Gow? All that beautiful art is basically static wallpaper slathered onto invisible walls.

Never seen anyone so happy about a game world as wide as a thimble before.

@hardwenzen:

Autopilot? Have you seen the traversal options in GOWR?

Only see more automated movement in a Naughty Dog title.

Ragnarok has voice acting, the best in the industry. Pokemon has little sounds playing like the game is running on a gameboy from the 90's. Your point?

The game wasn't designed to be an open world title, and if you want to see one, there's horizon 2 where you can interact with whatever, which doesn't make the game anywhere near as good as Ragnarok.

What playing God of War: Ragnarok looks like:

What beautiful vista's, if only I can go there.

Don't they use the same animations from the first game? 😂

They're reusing Halo 2 assets in Infinite, and you're talking about top quality animations GoW2018 had, and being reused in Ragnarok?

Pretty. Too bad the game is boring.

Are you expecting me to argue with you?

The Lems truly have been rekt. As for Sheep, they’ve accepted whatever Nintendo gives them. 2005 level graphics? Sure, that works for them, as long as they get to play the 50th iteration of Pokemon. As for Herms, they’re too insecure to admit that the game looks great.

Judging by the comments made by the lems here, I see a lot of butthurtness 😢

@SolidGame_basic: Sony games will never have the depth and amazing physics like Nintendo games have. Sony games are all graphical gimmicks that don’t even let you interact with that so called immersive world. Immersive my arse, it’s nothing but gimmicks.

Just look at Zelda vs Horizon comparison videos. Sony games are a joke. Im working on a new thread about how Sony uses graphical gimmicks to sell games but lack world depth and immersion. All their game are being made the same way using the same engines and assets.

Another day, another...

Poo cows. lol :P

elder scrolls 6, call of duty as well will be on ps5

now do a hfw2 vs zelda. just because a rock don't slide down the hill the world is not immersive.

same engines you don't know what your talking about. horizon emotion engine. naugty dog has there's. days gone unreal engine, insomniac has there own as well.

@gifford38: And they all recycle engines. GoW was old GoW engine. New horizon was old Horizon engine. All recycled trash gimmicks. They even used the same assets. These games lack any depth. Heck, the new Pokemon had more depth in its world than all the trash Sony games put togther from PS5. Sony is nothing but gimmicks. No depth, no physics, no innovation, no immersion, etc. Just pure gimmick shallow gaming design. Bottom of the barrel.

@hardwenzen: Yawn...

@hardwenzen: Yawn.

Of course you would take screenshots over and over again - the game play is so sparse, what else are you going to do during the hours and hours of CGI and hours and hours of walking up to thi gs and "pushing tbe square button"?

@dabear: Bro is like, this game is so awesome, you can take photos of empty levels. You can even interact with the levels by pressing Square on the camera, just like in the movies.

@mesome713: His arguments are the same that were used by lems to defend the Xbox One when it launched - "look at all these screen shots showing how awesome Ryse looks! No PS4 game can touch it!"

Granted, GoW > Ryse, but the technical reasons GoW looks the way it does is the same reason Ryse looked the way it did.

Yup looks great, thanks for the pics

No one gives a shit. Especially, when Sony is gameplay bankrupt. Have your graphics, I "PLAY" games.

Those 10 million still hurt i see.

I am at 108h, and still not done with the game. You can only dream about having this much content in a halo game. I bet you're pissed off seeing my screenshots, and finally having to force yourself, and accept the fact that Halo Infinite is at least one generation behind technically and 2-3 generation behind artistically.

When a person has no way to argue, they pretend to not give a shit😁You're actually not the only one, plenty are in the same boat as you. At this point you're pretty much indirectly admitting that Sony is so far ahead, that you don't even want them to be compared to MS offerings.

108 hours? It's not my fault you suck at video games.

And, Halo Infinite is so much fun to play, I don't care if there are other games out there that look better. Halo has never been an Xbox "graphics king", it's always been about the game play.

God of War and Horizon are Photo Mode games, not games I would play expecting to be entertained by gameplay because the gameplay for Ragnarök is painful. I would much rather explore planets in Starfield than that linear, Souls Light God of War.

That's because the game has a lot to offer, something generic titles such as Halo Infinite don't.😅If you want to do everything on the highest difficulty, you can, and there's a lot of it. Ragnarok makes Infinite look like a indie game tbh.

I was just funing you with the "you suck at video games comment" (I know you thought it was at least a little funny).

Halo had a ton to offer - including multiplayer.

They all have equally talented and dedicated people working in their studios. But execution and leadership varies and has effect on the product.

You suck at video games, bro.

You should start one to see if your claim is true.

With every new Sony banger that i buy, i will make a thread like this. It will open your eyes how far behind your xbox has fallen.

But my PS is doing just fine.

@hardwenzen:

C'mon son...Forbidden West?

Where the interactive geometry is inconsistent and actually worse than the terrible original?

At least in the first the painted rocks were clear.

Now its climb everything but nah not really and just leave the scan on cause it's all really arbitrary anyways.

Again, the game design just isn't there.

And that's ok. Because these roller coaster rides are pretty as eff.

Shallow as puddles but damn they're pretty. And that's fine because we need all kinds of games.

Even one's made for the lowest common denominator.

@hardwenzen: Bro look at that shitty clipping in Horizon. Shallow as a puddle. Pokemons world has more interaction than that, thats just sad. All gimmicks no substance.

The best money making franchise.

okay

@hardwenzen: Next year you will see from Nintendo and Xbox what gameplay is from their AAA bangers.

Your "next year" delusional talk is what i've been hearing since before the Scorpio was even released. We're at the end of 2022, and here you are, desperate with your next year copium. I feel bad for you, and your fellow lemmings. Really sad what has happened to our competition ever since Phil decided to port everything to pc, and focus on a $1 rent service instead of video games.

@xhawk27: Yeah, and hell still be stuck playing games that dictate his gameplay.