Give me a new Patapon or give me death!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] How could Sony fool you once? You don't even own a Vita + Sony never said that E3 was a Vita show.Hoznary
Â
Shahid Kamal Ahmad, Senior Business Development Manager at Sony Computer Entertainment Europe, teased everyone in late May that an "amazing big title" was coming to Vita.
Then Game Informer teased a "surprisingly big Vita show" at E3
http://gematsu.com/2013/05/game-informer-teases-surprisingly-big-ps-vita-show-at-e3
Â
And then nothing really happened aside from some good games we already know about like Tearaway
Did you read the tweet? No where did Ahmad say that the big title was for E3! It was those guys in game informer that jumped to conclusion. . I was pissed at first but then i went back to check upon them Yeah, he clarified and said that he's pretty much NDA'd. His enthusiasm leading up to the event seemed to hint at a lot of neat indie stuff for VITA (which was awesome)!Shuhei Yoshida didn't say anything about that on when interviewed (on Podcast Beyond!).Give me a new Patapon or give me death!
Jynxzor
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"] N[QUOTE="KBFloYd"][QUOTE="bonesawisready5"]
They've said similar things so many times I won't get my hopes up but I'd like:
$150 PS Vita with PSP Go lay out, slide out controls. 4-inch LCD screen to cut costs but still keep it nice and also smaller screen will extend battery life. Battery life of 6-9 hours minimum. Replace memory stick slot with MicroSD slot.
wakefulness
that might actually sell..
The slide out design actually costs money to manufacture. Those mechanical pieces always cost extra to lay out and implement.Logically you could save money to make up for that additional cost by changing the screen from 5 inch OLED to 4 inch LCD
The slide out design actually costs money to manufacture. Those mechanical pieces always cost extra to lay out and implement.[QUOTE="wakefulness"][QUOTE="bonesawisready5"]
that might actually sell..
bonesawisready5
Logically you could save money to make up for that additional cost by changing the screen from 5 inch OLED to 4 inch LCD
Not really. The mechnical instruments cost and the fact Sony might need to eat up a contract with Samsung over the VITA's OLED production might cost more than what they are doing now.[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"][QUOTE="wakefulness"] The slide out design actually costs money to manufacture. Those mechanical pieces always cost extra to lay out and implement.wakefulness
Logically you could save money to make up for that additional cost by changing the screen from 5 inch OLED to 4 inch LCD
Not really. The mechnical instruments cost and the fact Sony might need to eat up a contract with Samsung over the VITA's OLED production might cost more than what they are doing now.They could probably work out a great deal with Samsung to supply a smaller LCD screen. I'm sure Samsung would bite as they'd rather have some contract with a Sony handheld than none at all. Heck, they aren't meeting expectations on OLED screen productions anyway as they likely expected to make many more and then the system tanked. So if re-negotiating a deal where Samsung gets $5 per OLED screen on only 5 million devices means making more money via $2.50 per LCD screen on 15-30 million devices, I'd think they'd work it out. Samsung would understand that the jump from OLED to LCD is a cost cutting measure to get a cheaper model out the door and quite frankly they can't be making as much money as they hoped to off producing OLED screens for it.
Not really. The mechnical instruments cost and the fact Sony might need to eat up a contract with Samsung over the VITA's OLED production might cost more than what they are doing now.[QUOTE="wakefulness"][QUOTE="bonesawisready5"]
Logically you could save money to make up for that additional cost by changing the screen from 5 inch OLED to 4 inch LCD
bonesawisready5
They could probably work out a great deal with Samsung to supply a smaller LCD screen. I'm sure Samsung would bite as they'd rather have some contract with a Sony handheld than none at all. Heck, they aren't meeting expectations on OLED screen productions anyway as they likely expected to make many more and then the system tanked. So if re-negotiating a deal where Samsung gets $5 per OLED screen on only 5 million devices means making more money via $2.50 per LCD screen on 15-30 million devices, I'd think they'd work it out. Samsung would understand that the jump from OLED to LCD is a cost cutting measure to get a cheaper model out the door and quite frankly they can't be making as much money as they hoped to off producing OLED screens for it.
Sony isn't looking to Samsung for any OEM needs. Not when Sony can do their own thing (ala making their own PSP parts and manufacturing it). I don't know what the deal was (for Samsung to make the VITA OLED displays), but I don't know if Samsung would sit down with Sony and talk a reconstruction of a set deal all for the betterment of a Sony product. And that's what the deal might be like; Samsung might already have that money in hand from Sony (regardless of how big or small the dollar amount).PS Vita is getting slaughtered by the 3Ds but a least piracy hasn't gotten out hand yet like it did with the PSP :lol:
Â
Â
  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ÂPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment