@CroidX: There's a huge difference. I don't know what you mean by "minor enhancement" unless you're comparing it to PC version... which really doesn't matter. You're mad cus I have diferent opinion than yours ;D
and opinions can't be wrong right?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@CroidX: There's a huge difference. I don't know what you mean by "minor enhancement" unless you're comparing it to PC version... which really doesn't matter. You're mad cus I have diferent opinion than yours ;D
and opinions can't be wrong right?
@TheTruthIsREAL: Care to point all those huge differences.
So apparently I'm mad about your opinion oddly enough you didn't seem to answer my first question which is relevant to the topic. Guess you can't come up with much reason to justify spending 60 dollars.
The price point makes any attempts at superiority nullified my chumlings. Nice to see you try though.
I am almost shitting my pants at this face:
I mean, what?
It seems after making her appeal somewhat like a tangible person, they have quickly gone back to attempting to make her look like a Victoria secret model to appease the young people with the hormones. Sad indeed.
Objectively PC version has better AO (if DE even has any at all), better shadows, tesselation, better textures, better TressFX quality. It also has more tetailed objects in the environment.
Console version has different (subjectively better or worse) trees and character's eyes.
Objectively console version has better skin due to subsurface scattering and models attatched to the character model (guns, radio, arrows) jiggle when the character moves. Trees and plants are better animated.
Pick your poison. "Better" is not painting an accurate picture.
So, aparently the PS4 version is using a newer and more advanced version of the game engine, yet as these GIFs show it still manages to look worse than the PC version.
The first GIF is a right laugh, look at her face on the PS4 version and the texture on that tree...
Second GIF, hair still floats 2 inches above her shoulders, foliage may look slightly better ...or just different.
Third GIF, theres no DOF in the PS4 version? + stupid PS4 Lara model again, she looks like shes made of plastic, whats up with her eyes?
Definitive edition my arse.
I don´t think that gifs is good a way to compare shots. How about you just post real hd screenshots.
ok i could really see this at first cause i was at work on my phone, but now that I'm home the "definitive" version has more assets but honestly doesn't really look better in terms of quality of image.
I am almost shitting my pants at this face:
I mean, what?
^ proper gif here. Theres alot of pics/videos with the new ps4 model Lara and she looks horrendous. The ps4 version looks way too artificial with alot less emotions/expressions. They butchered Lara. It can't match the ultra settings of PC version. PC version remains best version. You're living in a dream world if you think otherwise.
PS: PS4 Lara's face and eyes are extremely laughable. Indeed permanent turd mode face! haha
Those gifs don't back up that claim too well. Also I'd expect some parts to be better as they are updating the engine and supposedly adding extra effects that the PC version doesn't have. I haven't seen that big a difference personally though but that's what the devs are saying
I see more foliage, weird.
I don't know why they decided to mess with the color grading. PC does have a nicer looking log in that first shot.
Probably to make the island seem more lush and vibrant
The PS4 version does not look better. It has less blur and brighter lighting. The textures aren't nearly as clear/crisp.
Cows never cease to amaze. Are you guys even looking at the screen shots?
My thoughts exactly. Their loyalty for a piece of plastic has blinded them utterly.
biggest difference is a bit more foliage, PC version could have easily had way more foliage, sucks we didn't get that instead we got the exact same as consoles
Also the log texture looks worse, i thought the textures were going to be 4x better than PC? it's more like 4x worse
Lara Croft.
Other wise please people, don't get this. If you really want the definitive edition get it on Steam.
In the first pic, PC looks best
PS4 lacks SSAO, some shadows and the texture is not nearly as good
Do i miss something ?
More foilage in the one screen, but everythign else is WORSE.
No SSAO and self shadowing - clealry seen in the flat looking grass (and less grass too in that shot). Also the textures look beter ont he PC version. And the PC version is the only one with some sort of depth of field filter.
And that face! Lol.
Everything worse.? My god you truly are butthurt...
They look identical and the PC version lack objects and has almost zero wind impact...
More foilage in the one screen, but everythign else is WORSE.
No SSAO and self shadowing - clealry seen in the flat looking grass (and less grass too in that shot). Also the textures look beter ont he PC version. And the PC version is the only one with some sort of depth of field filter.
And that face! Lol.
Everything worse.? My god you truly are butthurt...
They look identical and the PC version lack objects and has almost zero wind impact...
Pc version also has larger view distance. So yeah, pretty much better in most respects.
The foliage and the physics based movements/animations are nice though. Thing is, they aren't there on the PC because the devs chose not to put them there, not because the PC can't RUN these things. That's ahuge difference between games on PC and game son last gen consoles, and yet consolite where downplaying differences that were a LOT larger than what we see here.
But don't let me stop your salt train man. Keep on rollin'.
Pc version also has larger view distance. So yeah, pretty much better in most respects.
The foliage and the physics based movements/animations are nice though. Thing is, they aren't there on the PC because the devs chose not to put them there, not because the PC can't RUN these things. That's ahuge difference between games on PC and game son last gen consoles, and yet consolite where downplaying differences that were a LOT larger than what we see here.
But don't let me stop your salt train man. Keep on rollin'.
I know that is the reason and i already say that the PC version should look better on another thread,it was lack of effort of CD on the game,but considering those Max out setting are not running on a $400 dollar PC i say wow the PS4 did a nice job.
The PC running this setting has a what $350+ CPU with a $500 or more GPU.?
I am not rolling anything there are certain things that look better on the PS4 screen show,but like i already say on another thread nothing stop CD from making a patch that will add anything missing on the PC version.
Pc version also has larger view distance. So yeah, pretty much better in most respects.
The foliage and the physics based movements/animations are nice though. Thing is, they aren't there on the PC because the devs chose not to put them there, not because the PC can't RUN these things. That's ahuge difference between games on PC and game son last gen consoles, and yet consolite where downplaying differences that were a LOT larger than what we see here.
But don't let me stop your salt train man. Keep on rollin'.
I know that is the reason and i already say that the PC version should look better on another thread,it was lack of effort of CD on the game,but considering those Max out setting are not running on a $400 dollar PC i say wow the PS4 did a nice job.
The PC running this setting has a what $350+ CPU with a $500 or more GPU.?
I am not rolling anything there are certain things that look better on the PS4 screen show,but like i already say on another thread nothing stop CD from making a patch that will add anything missing on the PC version.
No. My friend running a $120 GPu and $100 CPu managed ultra settings on PC. This game is not Crysis 3.
Tormentos, in all seriousness, do you really, god's honest truth think the PS4 can match a $500 GPU?
@TheTruthIsREAL: ok dude
WUAHAHHAHAHAH butthurt virgin cows owned again,back to the basement nerds.
Paying thousands of dollars for a machine weaker than a $400 console - The hermit way.
That makes no sense at all
So why does TR look and run better on the PS4 than it does on a $2,000 PC?
On a $2,000 PC, TR looks worse than the PS4 version AND only has average FPS of 40.
So why does TR look and run better on the PS4 than it does on a $2,000 PC?
On a $2,000 PC, TR looks worse than the PS4 version AND only has average FPS of 40.
You might just need to visit an optometrist.
Paying thousands of dollars for a machine weaker than a $400 console - The hermit way.
That makes no sense at all
So why does TR look and run better on the PS4 than it does on a $2,000 PC?
On a $2,000 PC, TR looks worse than the PS4 version AND only has average FPS of 40.
Graphics wise the PC looks just as good or better in some areas. And it could be that they're not comparable because they are running different versions of the game
Pc version also has larger view distance. So yeah, pretty much better in most respects.
The foliage and the physics based movements/animations are nice though. Thing is, they aren't there on the PC because the devs chose not to put them there, not because the PC can't RUN these things. That's ahuge difference between games on PC and game son last gen consoles, and yet consolite where downplaying differences that were a LOT larger than what we see here.
But don't let me stop your salt train man. Keep on rollin'.
I know that is the reason and i already say that the PC version should look better on another thread,it was lack of effort of CD on the game,but considering those Max out setting are not running on a $400 dollar PC i say wow the PS4 did a nice job.
The PC running this setting has a what $350+ CPU with a $500 or more GPU.?
I am not rolling anything there are certain things that look better on the PS4 screen show,but like i already say on another thread nothing stop CD from making a patch that will add anything missing on the PC version.
i'm playing this on a 100 pound 2gb 7850 ( albeit overclocked at 1050Mhz ) and a 4year old phenom II and i play on ultra with tress fx and all and still manage to pull more than 40fps average. This aint crysis 4 or Battlefield 4 nor a bad port ala assasins creed 4
It's subjective as you can't easily compare more visual effects in the definitive edition with the standard benefits the PC version still has.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment