Pokemons returns in 2014 with Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire!

  • 153 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
#51 Edited by bbkkristian (14946 posts) -

ITSSSSS HAAPPPENNNNINNNNGGGGGGG

#hoennconfirmed

#52 Edited by 93BlackHawk93 (5388 posts) -

@93BlackHawk93 said:

God, let it rest a bit already...

Also, they wasted two names (Omega and Alpha) that could have been used for a new gen.

Pokemon is annual bro. it's been annual since 2014. It also has a very steady rhythm every generation (new games->remakes->enhanced third game). I don't know why you were expecting anything different, really.

If CoD and AC gets shit from being annual, why shouldn't this? Still getting the games though (Pokemon and AC).

#53 Posted by SolidGame_basic (17343 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Ocarina of Time 3D, Starfox 64 3D, Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D, Super Street Fighter 4 3D, Tekken 3D, Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater 3D, A Link Between Worlds (remake), Pokemon Omega Ruby, Alpha Sapphire (remake)

Also, 3DS suffers deeply from lack of new franchises. There are a couple here and there, but it's mostly the same franchises since inception. Mario, Kirby, Zelda, Fire Emblem, yada yada.

Also, another thing people miscalculate: multiplats aren't really ports. They are called multiplat for a reason. And that is an ADVANTAGE the Vita has over 3DS.

#54 Edited by bbkkristian (14946 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic: correction: A Link Between Worlds is a sequel. And it is not confirmed that these two pokemon games are remakes. Let's not be hasty.

All that leaves is first-mid second year remakes for when the 3ds wasn't doing so well. You still can't say that it's still a remake station.

#55 Edited by FlamesOfGrey (7509 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@FlamesOfGrey said:

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Yeah, no. Over half the Vita library is not ports / remakes. Please don't spread false information.

Yes it is, especially in the west. It's full of indie games on other systems.

Slightly curious, are you ever happy with anything Nintendo does with the 3DS?

If you're talking about PS Vita's digital offerings, you're right. The Vita's digital library is heavy with ports of indie games. Physical releases you're wrong and Vita's physical library is bigger then it's digital library.

Nintendo themselves? No. 3DS is good because of 3rd Party. Wii U is garbage that I am keeping around because Nintendo backed Bayonetta 2 (I'll give them credit for backing Platinum). I'm sure I've made it clear that I think Nintendo and the majority of their internal studios these days are lazy and a company heavily reliant on nostalgia and familiar characters.

#56 Edited by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Ocarina of Time 3D, Starfox 64 3D, Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D, Super Street Fighter 4 3D, Tekken 3D, Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater 3D, A Link Between Worlds (remake), Pokemon Omega Ruby, Alpha Sapphire (remake)

Also, 3DS suffers deeply from lack of new franchises. There are a couple here and there, but it's mostly the same franchises since inception. Mario, Kirby, Zelda, Fire Emblem, yada yada.

Also, another thing people miscalculate: multiplats aren't really ports. They are called multiplat for a reason. And that is an ADVANTAGE the Vita has over 3DS.

A Link Between Worlds is not a remake. What the fuck?

Tekken 3D is also not a remake. What the fuck?

Have you seen the amount of new games the 3DS gets? Did you list those? It would comically dwarf your 'remake' list.

3DS gets plenty of new franchises- stuff like Pushmo, Sakura Samurai, Rolling Western, Bravely Default.

Multiplats, ports, the point is those games are not Vita's games. They were put there just because. Having a multiplat library is an advantage when you have enough compelling exclusive content to begin with. The Vita does not.

#57 Posted by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@93BlackHawk93 said:

God, let it rest a bit already...

Also, they wasted two names (Omega and Alpha) that could have been used for a new gen.

Pokemon is annual bro. it's been annual since 2014. It also has a very steady rhythm every generation (new games->remakes->enhanced third game). I don't know why you were expecting anything different, really.

If CoD and AC gets shit from being annual, why shouldn't this? Still getting the games though (Pokemon and AC).

Well, good thing is, neither CoD nor AC get shit for being annual from me. I get as visibly excited and hyped for those as I do for Pokemon.

#58 Posted by SolidGame_basic (17343 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic said:

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Ocarina of Time 3D, Starfox 64 3D, Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D, Super Street Fighter 4 3D, Tekken 3D, Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater 3D, A Link Between Worlds (remake), Pokemon Omega Ruby, Alpha Sapphire (remake)

Also, 3DS suffers deeply from lack of new franchises. There are a couple here and there, but it's mostly the same franchises since inception. Mario, Kirby, Zelda, Fire Emblem, yada yada.

Also, another thing people miscalculate: multiplats aren't really ports. They are called multiplat for a reason. And that is an ADVANTAGE the Vita has over 3DS.

A Link Between Worlds is not a remake. What the fuck?

Tekken 3D is also not a remake. What the fuck?

Have you seen the amount of new games the 3DS gets? Did you list those? It would comically dwarf your 'remake' list.

3DS gets plenty of new franchises- stuff like Pushmo, Sakura Samurai, Rolling Western, Bravely Default.

Multiplats, ports, the point is those games are not Vita's games. They were put there just because. Having a multiplat library is an advantage when you have enough compelling exclusive content to begin with. The Vita does not.

Why would you assume that the Vita person has another option on another console? The fact that Vita owners don't have to buy a ps3 to play games like Dragon's Crown, FFX HD, Blaz Blue, Disgaea, etc is a HUGE plus. And having them on the go is a great benefit (owning it on console or not) So why is that a bad thing, again?

#59 Posted by 93BlackHawk93 (5388 posts) -

@93BlackHawk93 said:

@charizard1605 said:

@93BlackHawk93 said:

God, let it rest a bit already...

Also, they wasted two names (Omega and Alpha) that could have been used for a new gen.

Pokemon is annual bro. it's been annual since 2014. It also has a very steady rhythm every generation (new games->remakes->enhanced third game). I don't know why you were expecting anything different, really.

If CoD and AC gets shit from being annual, why shouldn't this? Still getting the games though (Pokemon and AC).

Well, good thing is, neither CoD nor AC get shit for being annual from me. I get as visibly excited and hyped for those as I do for Pokemon.

How do you feel about Advanced Warfare? Is it a sequel of any kind to Modern Warfare?

#60 Posted by FlamesOfGrey (7509 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Inferior ports at that.

@FlamesOfGrey said:
@PhazonBlazer said:

Oh good, more milkage.

People complain when there's a new Assassin's Creed of Call of Duty game, but when there's a remake of an old Pokemon game?

Dude, you know it's not milking when Nintendo does it, it's giving the fans what they want. They just happen to want to play the same **** every cycle.

You think Nintendo gets a pass?! I could say the same thing about Sony (TLoU). Lawlz!

No one gave TLOU a free pass. People did just what they did for AC / COD / Nintendo games... i.e. "This is milkage but oh well I'm still buying it.". Actually Nintendo fans don't even do the first part. They always think it's awesome.

#61 Edited by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Ocarina of Time 3D, Starfox 64 3D, Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D, Super Street Fighter 4 3D, Tekken 3D, Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater 3D, A Link Between Worlds (remake), Pokemon Omega Ruby, Alpha Sapphire (remake)

Also, 3DS suffers deeply from lack of new franchises. There are a couple here and there, but it's mostly the same franchises since inception. Mario, Kirby, Zelda, Fire Emblem, yada yada.

Also, another thing people miscalculate: multiplats aren't really ports. They are called multiplat for a reason. And that is an ADVANTAGE the Vita has over 3DS.

A Link Between Worlds is not a remake. What the fuck?

Tekken 3D is also not a remake. What the fuck?

Have you seen the amount of new games the 3DS gets? Did you list those? It would comically dwarf your 'remake' list.

3DS gets plenty of new franchises- stuff like Pushmo, Sakura Samurai, Rolling Western, Bravely Default.

Multiplats, ports, the point is those games are not Vita's games. They were put there just because. Having a multiplat library is an advantage when you have enough compelling exclusive content to begin with. The Vita does not.

Why would you assume that the Vita person has another option on another console? The fact that Vita owners don't have to buy a ps3 to play games like Dragon's Crown, FFX HD, Blaz Blue, Disgaea, etc is a HUGE plus. And having them on the go is a great benefit (owning it on console or not) So why is that a bad thing, again?

Except Vita owners do own a PS3 and/or PS4

#62 Posted by 93BlackHawk93 (5388 posts) -

@FlamesOfGrey: I think we both saw different reactions because cows reacted the same way as sheep. Spewing SDC, calling everyone else jealous or butthurt and shit.

#63 Posted by Crazyguy105 (9513 posts) -

OH MY GOD YES

I NEVER SAW IT COMING

HOLY SHIT I CANT BREATHE

#64 Posted by vashkey (33722 posts) -

Neat.

Vita fanboys be jelly.

As a 3DS only owner I ask of what? I mean, it's not as if there haven't already been a ton of Pokemon games. Skipping on a generations you wont be missing out on much.

#65 Edited by SolidGame_basic (17343 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic said:

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

@charizard1605 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

lmao where are the 3DS people complaining about remakes and ports now? oh wait, that's only reserved for Vita

The difference is very few 3DS games are remakes and ports- over half the Vita's library is remakes and ports.

(also that we aren't sure these are remakes yet, they might actually be sequels).

Ocarina of Time 3D, Starfox 64 3D, Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D, Super Street Fighter 4 3D, Tekken 3D, Metal Gear Solid Snake Eater 3D, A Link Between Worlds (remake), Pokemon Omega Ruby, Alpha Sapphire (remake)

Also, 3DS suffers deeply from lack of new franchises. There are a couple here and there, but it's mostly the same franchises since inception. Mario, Kirby, Zelda, Fire Emblem, yada yada.

Also, another thing people miscalculate: multiplats aren't really ports. They are called multiplat for a reason. And that is an ADVANTAGE the Vita has over 3DS.

A Link Between Worlds is not a remake. What the fuck?

Tekken 3D is also not a remake. What the fuck?

Have you seen the amount of new games the 3DS gets? Did you list those? It would comically dwarf your 'remake' list.

3DS gets plenty of new franchises- stuff like Pushmo, Sakura Samurai, Rolling Western, Bravely Default.

Multiplats, ports, the point is those games are not Vita's games. They were put there just because. Having a multiplat library is an advantage when you have enough compelling exclusive content to begin with. The Vita does not.

Why would you assume that the Vita person has another option on another console? The fact that Vita owners don't have to buy a ps3 to play games like Dragon's Crown, FFX HD, Blaz Blue, Disgaea, etc is a HUGE plus. And having them on the go is a great benefit (owning it on console or not) So why is that a bad thing, again?

Except Vita owners do own a PS3 and/or PS4

source?

#66 Posted by inb4uall (5458 posts) -

So I am 100% for the idea of Sequels/remakes in hoenn. Two things though.

#1 please don't make them garbage like X&Y nintendo.

#2 Why didn't you wait until E3?

#67 Edited by Sword-Demon (6970 posts) -

Nice, I skipped gen 3 so I'm really looking forward to this.

I figured this announcement would come sooner or later; they remade RB for the GBA, and GS for the DS, so one would assume they would remake RS for the 3DS.

Would have been better as an E3 announcement though.

#68 Posted by Shinobishyguy (22439 posts) -

Looks like salty vita fans are coming out of the woodwork right on schedule.

#69 Posted by PhazonBlazer (11697 posts) -

Ahh yes, the Pokemon fans are out in full force now.

The Last of Us is getting remade in full 1080p 60FPS on PS4 and everyone shits on it.

But when Pokemon gets remade with barely better graphics? "ZOMG POKEMANS! GOTTA BUY THEM ALL!!1!"

#70 Edited by jg4xchamp (47850 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

sorry dude...too old for pokemon, i wont ever understand it....no harm intended

You should give it a go, dude. Impeccable game design at its best.

In multiplayer maybe.

#71 Edited by finalstar2007 (25080 posts) -

Looks like salty vita fans are coming out of the woodwork right on schedule.

Salty Vita fans? i havent seen a single person even mention the Vita in here are you daydreaming?

why would Vita owners be salty even? Vita is getting tons of games this year i dont think many care for a milked franchise that does the same exact thing every single year and this is coming from a big pokemon fan whos getting this game day 1

:/

#72 Posted by vashkey (33722 posts) -

Just yuck. Ruby and Sapphire were the games pushed me away from Pokemon. Now it's going to be bloated by all the unnecessary gigapet crap from X/Y and probably make the story overindulgent too. Im done with this series.

Im kind of surprised Nintendo decided to remake em since they were the worst selling entires in the series. At this point though Pokemon fans will buy anything because of nostalgia

#73 Edited by Zassimick (6431 posts) -

God, the mobile site is just awful when people don't watch their quote chains.

But why in the world are ports/remakes complaints being discussed? People are gonna bitch about remakes or ports, and people are going to ignore that fact, purchase the game, then turn right around to another and call it out for being another boring remake. We call them hypocrites, and yes that's what fanboys are.

It isn't rocket science and I'm surprised to see decent posters getting their panties in a bunch over something so obvious.

#74 Edited by Renegade_Fury (17113 posts) -

Ew, these were the games that killed my love for the series.

#75 Edited by Shinobishyguy (22439 posts) -

@vashkey: bloated with the gigapet crap that you can completely ignore? Talk about complaining for the sake of it

#76 Edited by Blabadon (26139 posts) -

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

HYYYYYYYYYPPPPPPPPEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

FUCK THE VITA

#77 Edited by vashkey (33722 posts) -

On topic of something like this vs TLoU PS4.... cmon, it's not even the same thing. This is a celebration of this game, it's tenth anniversary.

TLoU on the other hand just came out last year. I'd still argue it justifies it's existence because of the higher resolution and frame rate with included dlc and the original came out so close to the PS4 launch. But a ton of the people you see excited for it already played it on the PS3.

The Pokemon Remakes are going to have a lot more changes and improvements by comparison, it's hardly comparable.

Regardless, Pokemon shouldn't get a free pass while Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed get slammed for doing the same thing. It's your nostalgia.

#78 Edited by vashkey (33722 posts) -

@vashkey: bloated with the gigapet crap that you can completely ignore? Talk about complaining for the sake of it

It's a part of the game, so yeah, I can complain about it.

#79 Posted by FlamesOfGrey (7509 posts) -

@Shinobishyguy said:

Looks like salty vita fans are coming out of the woodwork right on schedule.

Nintendo rehashing has nothing to do with the Vita. You seem salty considering you didn't tackle any issues and rather went straight for attacking another system.

#80 Edited by FlamesOfGrey (7509 posts) -

@93BlackHawk93 said:

@FlamesOfGrey: I think we both saw different reactions because cows reacted the same way as sheep. Spewing SDC, calling everyone else jealous or butthurt and shit.

I'm not sure what went down on this forum in particular but I saw a lot of Sony fans calling bull**** on it especially the $60 price.

#81 Posted by darkspineslayer (19607 posts) -

LOOOOOOOOOOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLLOOLOOLLOLOLLOLOLLOOLLLL

post-Mortime fuck you for greekgamingmaniac.

#82 Posted by Shinobishyguy (22439 posts) -

@vashkey: its a part of the game that isn't required or forced in any way and can be completely ignored.

#83 Posted by Blabadon (26139 posts) -

Shinodumbo damage controlling for some reason.

#84 Edited by finalstar2007 (25080 posts) -

DAT BOXART yo!!!!

#85 Posted by R4gn4r0k (16427 posts) -

@vashkey said:

On topic of something like this vs TLoU PS4.... cmon, it's not even the same thing. This is a celebration of this game, it's tenth anniversary.

TLoU on the other hand just came out last year. I'd still argue it justifies it's existence because of the higher resolution and frame rate with included dlc and the original came out so close to the PS4 launch. But a ton of the people you see excited for it already played it on the PS3.

The Pokemon Remakes are going to have a lot more changes and improvements by comparison, it's hardly comparable.

Regardless, Pokemon shouldn't get a free pass while Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed get slammed for doing the same thing. It's your nostalgia.

TLOU 1 year anniversary edition XD

Hahahahaha

#86 Posted by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

DAT BOXART yo!!!!

Ah, I see you are a Sapphire fan. Impeccable taste, finalstar

#87 Posted by Shinobishyguy (22439 posts) -

On topic: I hope sceptile and swampert get megas. It was messed up how blaziken got one but his brothers didn't

#88 Posted by 93BlackHawk93 (5388 posts) -

@finalstar2007 said:

DAT BOXART yo!!!!

Ah, I see you are a Sapphire fan. Impeccable taste, finalstar

Godzilla is better! :P

#89 Posted by vashkey (33722 posts) -

@vashkey: its a part of the game that isn't required or forced in any way and can be completely ignored.

So that means it's immune to criticism? No.

When a single player series gets a multiplayer people don't ignore it. They complain that something that was completely unnecessary to the game was added, that something that no one asked for took up time and resorces of the developer to create.

I didn't ask for a gigapet. I didn't want minigames. But I got them anyway and the developer could have put more time effort into other areas of the game instead and improved the core experience further.

So yeah, sorry to break your hearts Im going to complain about it all I want and I'm within right to do so.

#90 Posted by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

GAME FREAK. IF YOU FUCK UP THE MUSIC, I WILL FUCKING HUNT YOU DOWN AND MAKE YOU PAY. THERE WILL BE BLOOD. DO NOT FUCKING RUIN THE BEST SOUNDTRACK OF THE SERIES. I SWEAR TO GOD, DON'T.

#91 Posted by Shinobishyguy (22439 posts) -

@vashkey: its a completely harmless feature that does nothing to detract from the game and give each pokemon more personality beyond battling.

How is it a legit complaint? This is like the very definition of nitpicking

#92 Posted by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

@vashkey: its a completely harmless feature that does nothing to detract from the game and give each pokemon more personality beyond battling.

How is it a legit complaint? This is like the very definition of nitpicking

What are we even talking about? Why do you care if he finds that feature distracting or poorly executed? It's his opinion, let it go.

#93 Edited by Desmonic (13739 posts) -

@charizard1605: Eww. Why whould you be mad about having that replaced? O.o?

#94 Posted by Desmonic (13739 posts) -

@R4gn4r0k said:

TLOU 1 year anniversary edition XD

Hahahahaha

That's an odd way to write "TLOU: GOAT of all GOAT's" edition.......

:P

#95 Posted by charizard1605 (56840 posts) -

@Desmonic said:

@charizard1605: Eww. Why whould you be mad about having that replaced? O.o?

Did you just ew the best soundtrack in the series?

Here, here's the in game version. Now with 100% more trumpets.

#96 Edited by Slashkice (13087 posts) -

Meh, not interested in remakes of the worst Pokemon games.

#97 Posted by Desmonic (13739 posts) -

@charizard1605: Eww. Needs MOAR 8-bit :P

I kid, I kid. Would be cool if they updated the music, since the 3DS can handle that miles better (maybe insert a twist here and there).

#98 Edited by R4gn4r0k (16427 posts) -

@Desmonic said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

TLOU 1 year anniversary edition XD

Hahahahaha

That's an odd way to write "TLOU: GOAT of all GOAT's" edition.......

:P

TLOU: Goat simulator edition

XD

#99 Edited by finalstar2007 (25080 posts) -
#100 Edited by Wanderer5 (25700 posts) -

SAPPHIRE 4 LIFE! Also would be grand if NA gets those color covers too.:/