Next Nintendo console to be all powered by AMD

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

On a conference call Friday, AMD CEO's stated that “the company had won a third contract for a semi-custom chip design that she says will be used in products that could generate billions of dollars in sales.”

The other two contracts are with Sony and Microsoft since AMD provides semi-custom chip designs for the Playstation 4 and the Xbox One consoles.

This is good news for AMD and Nintendo. Nintendo should have dumped that crap IBM processor and should have gone with a vastly superior AMD CPU and GPU to begin with and not just the GPU from AMD. In turn, AMD will get much needed cash if the Nintendo's next console (Nintendo NX?) if it sells well. I just hope that the CPU + GPU is comparable (or at least close to the power of the Xbox One/PS4). I believe that will drastically improve the graphics quality of Nintendo games or at least allow Nintendo fans to get some descent graphics on cross platform games that are comparable to the PS4/Xbox One. Also, all 3 consoles being on x86 and AMD hardware will hopefully ease cross platform porting of games.

Source:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/amd-design-chip-nintendo-nx-211009657.html

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Well Nvidia turned down Sony and MS, so i doubt they would have accepted nintendo

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#3 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

Doesn't mean it'll be a SOC. But man, let's hope it is.

Avatar image for samusbeliskner
SamusBeliskner

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By SamusBeliskner
Member since 2015 • 569 Posts

Nintendo is too late to the game. The NX is not going to sell well.

Avatar image for deactivated-583e460ca986b
deactivated-583e460ca986b

7240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-583e460ca986b
Member since 2004 • 7240 Posts

That is if AMD is still around then.

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9730 Posts

Info from another site. Please don't say too long didn't read.

http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/16/more-hints-that-amd-is-building-nintendo-nxs-processor/

We’re guessing that AMD will supply the main processor for the upcoming Nintendo machine. That’s not too much of a leap of faith, as AMD already supplies the chips for Wii U, Sony’s PlayStation 4, and Microsoft’s Xbox One. It’s an important chip project, as the processor is key to whether Nintendo’s next machine will be competitive and affordable. And for AMD, which has reported losses for a couple of quarters, it could be a safe haven for bruising competition with Intel.

Nintendo could make the leap from IBM’s PowerPC to x86-based (AMD and Intel) architecture. It would make sense for Nintendo to continue its relationship with AMD (which makes the graphics chip for the Wii U) and switch to use x86 architecture in its next-generation design, which Nintendo announced would be called the NX.

AMD classifies its game console chips as “semi-custom.” These “accelerated processing unit” (APU) chips combine a central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) on a single chip. Intel makes such chips as well, but AMD had an edge in the previous generation of consoles because it focused much more on the graphics side of the chip. AMD successfully sold custom versions of its APUs to Microsoft and Sony. AMD succeeded with the argument that it could cut out one chip from the system with its combo chip design.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

confirmed to be underpowered

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

Im guessing Nintendo struck a deal for cheap using IBM and ARM11 as bait. AMD is in need of some money to help out their business it seems, will be cool to see what they come up with. Nintendo might have stuck gold.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@silversix_ said:

confirmed to be underpowered

It's should be better than their current solution. I have 8570M (6 CU GCN) which can still play games from Xbox One era without having to re-factor/re-code the game i.e Project Cars Wii U build problem.

Wii U's Radeon HD 4650M power is too low for simple graphics scale down.

Wii U's weak CPUs would require changes to CPU side game play modelling.

Nintendo needs a box that easily run current gen 3rd party games while supporting their exclusive Nintendo IP.

Anything better than Xbox One should be enough.

Most current arcade game machines are based on recent design X86-64 CPUs.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95
deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95

2103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95
Member since 2011 • 2103 Posts

It's still a rumor, but it would be an upgrade for Nintendo, hopefully they choose a powerful CPU in the end.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#11 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@silversix_ said:

confirmed to be underpowered

It's should be better than their current solution. I have 8570M (6 CU GCN) which can still play games from Xbox One era without having to re-factor/re-code the game i.e Project Cars Wii U build problem.

Wii U's Radeon HD 4650M power is too low for simple graphics scale down.

Wii U's weak CPUs would require changes to CPU side game play modelling.

Nintendo needs a box that easily run current gen 3rd party games while supporting their exclusive Nintendo IP.

Anything better than Xbox One should be enough.

Most current arcade game machines are based on recent design X86-64 CPUs.

I would like to see it have 800 SPs because then it will give the Xbox One a real run for it's money. I bet it will be <= 720 SPs which is kinda lame for a console that is coming 3 years after the Xbox One that is specifically intended for gaming.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#12 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

I bought a ps3 in 2009, and then a wii u when it launched. I bought an xbox in 2001, and a 360 shortly after launch. I bought an N64 in 1996, and a Dreamcast in 1999.

People love tech. If it is a good system that excites people, they'll buy it. I bought a wii u more as a means to get Nintendo games. Spec wise it was always underwhelming though. They need a console that excites people when it is revealed. They know this, too.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44562 Posts

@lostrib said:

Well Nvidia turned down Sony and MS, so i doubt they would have accepted nintendo

Did they? They burned their bridges with MS on the original Xbox, they refused to lower the prices on their chips not allowing MS to stay competitive on price, basically the entire reason the Xbox bit the dust early and jumped on the Xbox 360, so I can see why MS doesn't want to do business with them. And Sony paid out quite a bunch of money to them for their RSX chip, and I remember years back there being some unflattering articles about that. I wouldn't doubt it was Microsoft and Sony that wanted nothing to do with Nvidia. You can tell they were rather hurt by being shunned, and you could tell by the petty public statements they were making after everyone went with AMD this gen. And if Nvidia is saying that it was them that wanted nothing to do with consoles, that's like the person that gets dumped by their girlfriend but will tell other people otherwise...

Loading Video...

Avatar image for kingjazziephiz
kingjazziephiz

2650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 kingjazziephiz
Member since 2006 • 2650 Posts

Hoping for a miracle that it's stronger than my PC lol.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12183 Posts

@GoldenElementXL said:

That is if AMD is still around then.

I heard MS might buy them.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#17 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016?

Works for me.

Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Ready for it, after I get my hands on Xenoblade Chronicles X (hopefully US release dates is the same as AU - Dec) & Fatal Frame 5 don't care if they kill the Wii U...Nintendo won't be launching anymore big title after Zelda (Wii U) anyway which will most likely be NX launch title. Bought my Wii U at launch Nov 2012. :P

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@lamprey263:

This is the result when Intel and NVIDIA doesn't compete for this particular market segment.

@Xtasy26:

It also depends on CU's clock speed i.e. AMD FX-8800p APU with + 4 CPU threads at &amp;gt;2.1Ghz + 8 CU at 800Mhz has 35 watts TDP.

AMD FX-8800p APU is being fab in GoFlo instead of TSMC, hence better performance per watts.

Scenario A, Doubling AMD FX-8800p APU's CU count to 16 would yield around 60 watts. This would have 1.638 TFLOPS. Based from Pitcairn Island's 20 CU GCN. PS4's GPU is based from Pitcairn Island GCN with some of Hawaii's 8 ACE unit improvement. PS4 doesn't have Tonga's ROPS delta compression and tessellation improvements.

Scenario B, Swapping out AMD FX-8800p APU's 8 CU GCN for 12 CU at 1Ghz would yield 1.536 TFLOPS. Based from Bonaire's 14 CU GCN.

Both scenarios are under PS4's 1.84 TFLOPS, but still greater than Xbox One's 1.31 TFLOPS.

AMD FX-8800p APU has Tonga GCN's improvements e.g. tessellation/register storage, ROPS Delta compression.

We don't know if NX will use a middle range Artic Islands GCN that replaces Bonaire GCN(7790, R7-260, R7-260X, R7-360, Xbox One)

The 8 CU IGP for FX-8800p APU has 8 ACE units, better tessellation and ROPS delta compression, hence newer GCN designs should have Tonga's improvements.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21064 Posts

It'll be shit outdated hardware with performance of a 2010 high end pc and a cpu that performs like a core2 duo.

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#21 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts

-_- not good , not good at all

Avatar image for kingjazziephiz
kingjazziephiz

2650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 kingjazziephiz
Member since 2006 • 2650 Posts

@Gaming-Planet: thanks for telling me. Pre order canceled

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Gaming-Planet:

For a budget PC build, the GPU takes priority over the CPU.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21064 Posts

@ronvalencia said:

@Gaming-Planet:

For a budget PC build, the GPU takes priority over the CPU.

Except when it struggles to play open world games and games with lots of physics and particles.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Gaming-Planet:

They need to set the CPU clock speed higher e.g 2.1 Ghz or higher with turbo boost mode.

1.6 Ghz or 1.75 Ghz without a turbo mode would require multi threading to be a must have not an option. Desktop PC CPUs has turbo clock speeds for lesser multi threading programs.

It's unlikely Nintendo will be using Tonga GCN mobile.

Microsoft's Xbox One chip budget could have yielded Tonga level GCN ie. MS wasted their chip area budget for 32 MB ESRAM.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#26 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Yea I don't think I'll ever be buying a Nintendo console ever again tell they get off their lazy asses and get some 3rd party support, I give 0 shits how "powerful" they try to make their next console.

Avatar image for Desmonic
Desmonic

19990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Desmonic  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 19990 Posts

@lostrib said:

Well Nvidia turned down Sony and MS, so i doubt they would have accepted nintendo

Something tells me that Nvidia was the one dumped by MS and Sony. This going by the extremely petty public comments Nvidia has made on the subject. Though it's likely one of those things we will only find out if someone on the inside ever decides to talk about it.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44066 Posts

So in other words, MS eh, this gonna be gud.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#29 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41534 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Pretty pissed off, I'd imagine.

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#30 YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9716 Posts

Nintendo should have never put Espresso in the Wii U, or bothered developing it for that matter. It would have been acceptable last gen, but it's not 2006 anymore. If the NX is Nintendo's next home console, which most reports are suggesting at this point, then it should be more powerful than the platforms currently out. Doesn't mean it will be, but it should.

They need to do whatever it takes to get 3rd parties back on board.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@samusbeliskner said:

Nintendo is too late to the game. The NX is not going to sell well.

And you know this how? Neither the X1 nor the PS4 have matched the fervor caused when the Wii was released. It's another tepid gaming generation where the two twin consoles are the same and there's nothing exciting for casuals.

This is an arena ripe for Nintendo to step in with something fresh and attention grabbing. The NX could very well rise to the occasion. But you think small and that is why you are not Nintendo and Nintendo is Nintendo.

Nintendo.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

Come on Nintendo 3GB DDR3 system,4GB GDDR5 or staked 2GB,and a 7950 Boost at least i know that by late 2016 that should be cheaper to make than the PS4 was on 2013.

Alto the power consumption may ruin out dreams...

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@Desmonic said:
@lostrib said:

Well Nvidia turned down Sony and MS, so i doubt they would have accepted nintendo

Something tells me that Nvidia was the one dumped by MS and Sony. This going by the extremely petty public comments Nvidia has made on the subject. Though it's likely one of those things we will only find out if someone on the inside ever decides to talk about it.

Yep Nvidia screwed up MS and sony both.

MS because they refuse to lower the price of its chip landed both parties in court,and sony because the damn RSX cost more to Sony than the Xenos cost MS which is a joke since the Xenos was much more capable.

Sony should have got at least a damn 7900GTX out of Nvidia for the price they pay back then.

Avatar image for ultimateimp
UltimateImp

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#34 UltimateImp
Member since 2015 • 1192 Posts

Well, Nintendo is doomed anyway.

Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts

Hoping its considerably stronger than the 360/ps3 this time around.

Avatar image for deactivated-583e460ca986b
deactivated-583e460ca986b

7240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-583e460ca986b
Member since 2004 • 7240 Posts

@tormentos said:

Come on Nintendo 3GB DDR3 system,4GB GDDR5 or staked 2GB,and a 7950 Boost at least i know that by late 2016 that should be cheaper to make than the PS4 was on 2013.

Alto the power consumption may ruin out dreams...

I'm pretty sure that Nintendo would go with what the competition is doing and go with 8GB "unified" since I have a feeling they are trying to win over 3rd parties yet again. Things like cost reduction of the now last generation DDR3 and GDDR5 memory as well as AMD's current financial woes play in Nintendo's favor regarding getting a good deal. It should be easy for Nintendo to put out a contender power wise while undercutting both in price. This only happens if they ditch any sort of gimmick input device, however.

Then again I could see Nintendo going under powered all together. It doesn't take beefy hardware for Nintendo to make fantastic looking first party titles. The type of games they make look good without ultra high res textures and things like that. I guess it will all depend on who the successor is and what direction they want to take the console business in.

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#37 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

I'm hoping for something more powerful than the PS4 to draw in some 3rd party ports. If Nintendo can somehow come out with a system that outperforms the competition while giving incentive to 3rd parties to support the console all while Nintendo delivers 1st partiy games, the machine could sell. Nintendo needs to change their thought process from thinking people don't want the cutting edge technology to the fact that they actually do. I mean it is acceptable in todays world to upgrade your phone every year to get the newest technology. People want cutting edge in their consoles these days while not having to build a PC to get it. Back when the Wii launched, people were enthralled with Wii Sports, but that novelty wore off and people aren't buying gimmicks like they were. Give us power Nintendo, so you can regain some power in the console war.

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

I hate to say it, but I really think I am done with Nintendo at this point, unless they release something really impressive.

They also really need to fix their online. Along with the whole buy a virtual console game and it's tied to the console or handheld, and your N.N.I.D. crap before I even look at them again.

Avatar image for samusbeliskner
SamusBeliskner

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 SamusBeliskner
Member since 2015 • 569 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:
@samusbeliskner said:

Nintendo is too late to the game. The NX is not going to sell well.

And you know this how? Neither the X1 nor the PS4 have matched the fervor caused when the Wii was released. It's another tepid gaming generation where the two twin consoles are the same and there's nothing exciting for casuals.

This is an arena ripe for Nintendo to step in with something fresh and attention grabbing. The NX could very well rise to the occasion. But you think small and that is why you are not Nintendo and Nintendo is Nintendo.

Nintendo.

You are engaging in what is commonly referred to as extremely wishful thinking.

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@samusbeliskner said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@samusbeliskner said:

Nintendo is too late to the game. The NX is not going to sell well.

And you know this how? Neither the X1 nor the PS4 have matched the fervor caused when the Wii was released. It's another tepid gaming generation where the two twin consoles are the same and there's nothing exciting for casuals.

This is an arena ripe for Nintendo to step in with something fresh and attention grabbing. The NX could very well rise to the occasion. But you think small and that is why you are not Nintendo and Nintendo is Nintendo.

Nintendo.

You are engaging in what is commonly referred to as extremely wishful thinking.

I think its a lot better then engaging in hating, but dont let me stop you, hate on brother.

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10141 Posts

Hopefully it's the 14nm "Zen" tech they're working on now.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@mesome713 said:
@samusbeliskner said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@samusbeliskner said:

Nintendo is too late to the game. The NX is not going to sell well.

And you know this how? Neither the X1 nor the PS4 have matched the fervor caused when the Wii was released. It's another tepid gaming generation where the two twin consoles are the same and there's nothing exciting for casuals.

This is an arena ripe for Nintendo to step in with something fresh and attention grabbing. The NX could very well rise to the occasion. But you think small and that is why you are not Nintendo and Nintendo is Nintendo.

Nintendo.

You are engaging in what is commonly referred to as extremely wishful thinking.

I think its a lot better then engaging in hating, but dont let me stop you, hate on brother.

There's enough negativity in this world. There's two twin consoles that each do the same thing. They can pick either one. Why do they find Nintendo so threatening? Is Nintendo somehow taking away their precious PS4 or Xbox One?

Wii U: People are hating, Alfred. What would you have me do?

Alfred Pennyworth: Endure, Nintendo. Take it. They'll hate you for it, but that's the point of Nintendo, you can be the outcast. You can make the choice that no one else can make, the right choice.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Well, if E3 is any indication, Nintendo seems to be just about finished supporting the Wii U, so I'm not sure why Wii U owners would care if the NX launches in 2016 or 2017. They aren't getting much in 2016 either way.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

You hope it's comparable to PS4? It will be coming out nearly 3 years after, it should be superior in every way.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@PurpleMan5000 said:
@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Well, if E3 is any indication, Nintendo seems to be just about finished supporting the Wii U, so I'm not sure why Wii U owners would care if the NX launches in 2016 or 2017. They aren't getting much in 2016 either way.

As a Wii U owner...i sort of don't care. I'll get the PS4, X1, and then the NX. And then I'll still go back and play plenty of MK8 online on my Wii U.

Whatever...I'm too old to be fighting invisible corporate enemies.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:
@PurpleMan5000 said:
@Xtasy26 said:

I wonder how the Wii U owners would feel if the NX launched in 2016? The Wii U launched in 2012 which is not too long ago ( I mean we still haven't hit the 3 year mark). Most of the Wii U good games started to come out in 2013/2014 and now this year. Will they buy another console given that many of them brought the Wii U only maybe 1 - 2 years ago?

Well, if E3 is any indication, Nintendo seems to be just about finished supporting the Wii U, so I'm not sure why Wii U owners would care if the NX launches in 2016 or 2017. They aren't getting much in 2016 either way.

As a Wii U owner...i sort of don't care. I'll get the PS4, X1, and then the NX. And then I'll still go back and play plenty of MK8 online on my Wii U.

Whatever...I'm too old to be fighting invisible corporate enemies.

Yeah, I agree. I'm still not sure if I'll ever get the PS4 or X1, though. The X1 looks like it might be worth a purchase soon, but the PS4 is still a long way from desirable.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

@lostrib:

its other way around...nintendo, MS and sony all turned down nvidia. Nvidia is terrible bang for buck and the only thing worth mentioning for them, driver support, doesn't matter 2 shits on consoles because developers can't gimp their software intentionally without screwing themselves over. This is the one good thing about consoles that I can say with confidence is better than the pc, there is no politics, motivation is much purer.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#48 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

@Xtasy26: AMD is a solid company with solid products imho. So why not ?

The question is ... what kind of hardware NX will have in order to compete the already established PS4/X1 ? If will be one of the same then ... QQ

Avatar image for whalefish82
whalefish82

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By whalefish82
Member since 2013 • 511 Posts

What I don't get with Nintendo is why they didn't just release a console that was as powerful as the PS4 in the first place. Then they'd have got good versions of all the multi-platform titles as well as having their own high selling franchises, with better graphics than ever before. They could have completely dominated the console market.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@whalefish82 said:

What I don't get with Nintendo is why they didn't just release a console that was as powerful as the PS4 in the first place. Then they'd have got good versions of all the multi-platform titles as well as having their own high selling franchises, with better graphics than ever before. They could have completely dominated the console market.

Nintendo doesn't like taking a loss on each console sold. This is how they've stayed in the game for so long. They take in money they don't burn it.