Killzone 3 Multiplayer is PERFECT! better then Halo tbh

It's very easy.
Didn't play it that much,but getting triple kills is easy as hell.

KZ3 does have the best MP this gen imo. They need to sort out some of the matchmaking issues and get rid of the option to choose your region. I'm tired of hearing people speak Japanese, French, Spanish, or a number of languages I can't identify.

There is lag, it comes from the aforementioned puddle jumping game wreckers.

Why does every fanboy always claim their favourite MP games have NO LAG WHATSOEVER! Its an outright lie and they know it.6matt6

Killzone 3 online is amazing!! i remember playing KZ2 online for only a few hours then stopped but Killzone 3 i been playing non-stop! loving the controls

[QUOTE="6matt6"]Why does every fanboy always claim their favourite MP games have NO LAG WHATSOEVER! Its an outright lie and they know it.spookykid143

not really, not at all.

killzone 3 isn't even better than killzone 2 (multiplayer). so it definitely is not even close to reach.

i agree... much better then halo inb4reviews/sales/bajillionplayersonlinecampzor

Oh you mean the only FACTS there are LMAO KZ LMAO :lol:

i agree... much better then halo inb4reviews/sales/bajillionplayersonlinecampzor

yeah, in before facts that refute opinion.

we get it.

Perfect? It's still far from the real multiplayer games like Quake 3, UT 2k4, Counter Strike Source, Battlefield 2... and those are just the FPSs.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Perfect? It's still far from the real multiplayer games like Quake 3, UT 2k4, Counter Strike Source, Battlefield 2... and those are just the FPSs.

WilliamRLBaker

seriously the multiplayer in Kz3 is amazing!

and best of all, NO LAG, just perfect streaming of kills and blood 8)

this is the best Shooter on the ps3 if not....on all platforms.

Killzone 3 > Halo rEach

iMojo786_PSN

Not even close. Maybe on PS3, but no where near the best when compared to PC shooters.

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Perfect? It's still far from the real multiplayer games like Quake 3, UT 2k4, Counter Strike Source, Battlefield 2... and those are just the FPSs.

DerpyMcDerp

And Halo doesn't?

What i like about the MP is mainly Warzone and the general hectic feeling you get during those close quater firefights. Unfortunately Killzone 3 has some of the worst maps i've seen in a long time, also very few maps.

What i like about the MP is mainly Warzone and the general hectic feeling you get during those close quater firefights. Unfortunately Killzone 3 has some of the worst maps i've seen in a long time, also very few maps.

Crystal-Rush

Played the beta, feels like COD. But Reach I just keep coming back to it, I'll save my money for Infamous 2.

[QUOTE="spookykid143"]

[QUOTE="6matt6"] I find that hard to believe. There is no such thing as a lag free game. 6matt6

Warhawk, Resistance 1 and 2, and MAG are usually free of any noticeable lag. I say usually, 'cause there is the odd game that you will notice someone lagging. I also say noticeable lag, because there has to be lag since it's online, but it doesn't impact the gameplay in those games.

People should really expect more from their online games rather than just accept lag as a part of playing online.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Perfect? It's still far from the real multiplayer games like Quake 3, UT 2k4, Counter Strike Source, Battlefield 2... and those are just the FPSs.

WilliamRLBaker

REAL multiplayer games? what quantifies those games as REAL multiplayer and not killzone 3 or halo reach...etc?

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Perfect? It's still far from the real multiplayer games like Quake 3, UT 2k4, Counter Strike Source, Battlefield 2... and those are just the FPSs.

DerpyMcDerp

Quake 3 ROCKET LAUNCHER WIN, UT2k4 get the rocket launcher WIN, Counter strike source FLASH BANG....etc..etc Please dont act like those games take any more skill then halo or Killzone does a game takes as much skill as your willing to put into it. Edit: explaination In any match Quake 3, UT2k4 where the weapons are limited to base weapons upon spawn where do the players go towards the weakest weapons? or the high powered weapons just like killzone 3 and halo...

A ""supposed"" high skilled game its players would be able to migrate over to halo or killzone 3 and instantly dominate because they are highly skilled right? not so much it doesn't work that way completely different skill set at times. A team works together, often practices together working out strategies and the strength of its members and they dominate right? the same for any game, a group of randoms that have never played the game before will have the same amount of skill in any game its not like a game instantly requires this skill therefor people that play it are skilled or have a hard time getting kills against other new players. I hate the concept that one game has a higher skill requirement it has a higher practice requirement and learning curve when it comes to its population not the game it self.

I used to fight the controls of KZ2 and didnt feel that I could dominate or be in control.

But in KZ3 my fate is in my own hands...sort of, so in that respect kz3 is leagues better than 2, GG were right 'Control is Everything'

I like Halo: Reach. I played it for several hours with friends, but I didn't fall in love with it like I did with KZ3. Even Dualshock to Microsoft Controller they're not even close, but with the Move/Sharpshooter KZ3 blows Halo out of the water.