Its still the beginning of the year. We still dont know all the games coming out for PS3 and 360. Its a little early to say that the PS3 has a lot more games when we dont know all the arcade and pc/360 multiplats out this year. Plus that ign list is really really really bad. Last of Us is the only interesting game on that list.[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]
OMG, it's like talking to a child :roll:
you turn the facts i say to opinion of yours
1.ps3 have alot more games than xbox 1 game this year ?! YES it's a fact...what ever your opinion about them i really don't care what you think
Â
2. here
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-tomb-raider-face-off
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-metal-gear-rising-face-off
Â
3.you just admit what i said is a fact about ps4 here but again you run to insults to hide your weak opinion
Â
don't be this butthurt:lol:
mems_1224
Â
From the article you posted of MGR, "In the final call, both versions of Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance are well worth considering, with each fronting unique advantages. Call it a tie overall: the performance nod goes to the 360 rendition of the game, often running with a 10FPS lead, while image quality purists are strongly advised to seek out the crisper PS3 version."
Â
Â
From the Tomb Raider article, "The console versions of Tomb Raider are still thoroughly recommended though. Despite some performance issues on both systems when the action is situated in more complex environments, the game manages to stick closely to the desired 30FPS update with only momentary lapses that impact the quality of the gameplay. While the 360 offers up slightly more consistent overall performance, for the most part the difference between the two games isn't significant, and it's also fair to say that the PS3 holds the advantage with regards to image quality and the general refinement of the overall presentation. This is a game where much of the experience is built around the spectacle and in that respect, PS3 offers an advantage of its 360 sibling. Aside from various instances where performance is visibly lower, the gameplay is otherwise just as enjoyable on Sony's system, and the sharper visuals better suit the overall feel of the game, highlighting the richness of the environments without as many unwanted side-effects. In that respect the PS3 version gets our recommendation as the preferred choice of the two console releases."
Fact: the games play better on the 360. Gameplay>graphics when comparing consoles. Way to own yourself.Â
I didn't run to insults, I merely pointed out the obvious. If you think that the PS4 having a lot of hype a few weeks after its announcement is a big advantage then you clearly lack common sense. Whether its a fact or not that point is irrelevant.
Â
I also find it funny that you cry because I called you stupid and then insult me in the first line of your post. Hypocrite.Â
again you say your opinion about the list when that was not the point ps3 have alot more exclusives this year ...want to admit it or not that's your problem lol you pick what you ever you want to read here let me help face off TR the Digital Foundry verdict : "the PS3 version gets our recommendation as the preferred choice of the two console releases." face off MGR the Digital Foundry verdict "strongly advised to seek out the crisper PS3 version." go spin it all you want slightly more performance doesn't make up for being worse in gfx which is why they choose the ps3 version way to own your self kid and lol again you admit ps4 have all the hype which it does ... you talk like xbox will take all the hype from ps4 when they show it in E3 ..you do know sony will be in E3 too MS is in very hard place right now
GET HYPED
Log in to comment