Capcom: Don't Expect Monster Hunter Vita, You Will Disappoint Yourself

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
Monster Hunter only sales big in Japan and that hasn't been Sonys biggest region since in years. Sony needs to focus on Europe and America. The need to make sure games like Bioshock for Vita get made. MH while it would be nice isn't going to do much for the Vita on a worldwide scale.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
Monster Hunter only sales big in Japan and that hasn't been Sonys biggest region since in years. Sony needs to focus on Europe and America. The need to make sure games like Bioshock for Vita get made. MH while it would be nice isn't going to do much for the Vita on a worldwide scale.FlamesOfGrey
No but they need to get one foot inside the handheld country which is known as Japan... So i hope SS does something
Avatar image for Yangire
Yangire

8795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Yangire
Member since 2010 • 8795 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]Monster Hunter only sales big in Japan and that hasn't been Sonys biggest region since in years. Sony needs to focus on Europe and America. The need to make sure games like Bioshock for Vita get made. MH while it would be nice isn't going to do much for the Vita on a worldwide scale.Hoznary
No but they need to get one foot inside the handheld country which is known as Japan... So i hope SS does something

I doubt a new IP will sell many systems in Japan.

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#54 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

Too bad for PSV owners, thought for sure Monster Hunter would come to the PSV. Guess this means PSV is offically dead.

Avatar image for LittleMac19
LittleMac19

1638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#55 LittleMac19
Member since 2009 • 1638 Posts
Lol, this was the PSP's answer to Pokemon and they let it walk right out the door, pathetic.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]Monster Hunter only sales big in Japan and that hasn't been Sonys biggest region since in years. Sony needs to focus on Europe and America. The need to make sure games like Bioshock for Vita get made. MH while it would be nice isn't going to do much for the Vita on a worldwide scale.Hoznary
No but they need to get one foot inside the handheld country which is known as Japan... So i hope SS does something

Yeah, they're not getting a strong foothold in Japan anytime soon. Sony's best selling IP's are from their Western developers for Western gamers outside of Gran Turismo and they're not buying up exclusivity either. And no, quality game or not Soul Sacrifice isn't going to do much in japan unless a mracle happens.
Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
:lol: Capcom burned Vita owners
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]Monster Hunter only sales big in Japan and that hasn't been Sonys biggest region since in years. Sony needs to focus on Europe and America. The need to make sure games like Bioshock for Vita get made. MH while it would be nice isn't going to do much for the Vita on a worldwide scale.FlamesOfGrey
No but they need to get one foot inside the handheld country which is known as Japan... So i hope SS does something

Yeah, they're not getting a strong foothold in Japan anytime soon. Sony's best selling IP's are from their Western developers for Western gamers outside of Gran Turismo and they're not buying up exclusivity either. And no, quality game or not Soul Sacrifice isn't going to do much in japan unless a mracle happens.

That is why they should have bought the MH franchise! STUPID SONY
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] No but they need to get one foot inside the handheld country which is known as Japan... So i hope SS does something

Yeah, they're not getting a strong foothold in Japan anytime soon. Sony's best selling IP's are from their Western developers for Western gamers outside of Gran Turismo and they're not buying up exclusivity either. And no, quality game or not Soul Sacrifice isn't going to do much in japan unless a mracle happens.

That is why they should have bought the MH franchise! STUPID SONY

Capcom would NEVER sell Monster Hunter to anyone unless they were going out of business. Capcom barely supported the PSP (They even promised games like Resident Evil and then never delivered.). Only reason MH wasnot on the DS was because the DS couldn't handle it like the PSP. I wouldn't expect much of anything from Capcom on the Vita now that they've gotten their fighting game ports out of the way.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Yeah, they're not getting a strong foothold in Japan anytime soon. Sony's best selling IP's are from their Western developers for Western gamers outside of Gran Turismo and they're not buying up exclusivity either. And no, quality game or not Soul Sacrifice isn't going to do much in japan unless a mracle happens.

That is why they should have bought the MH franchise! STUPID SONY

Capcom would NEVER sell Monster Hunter to anyone unless they were going out of business. Capcom barely supported the PSP (They even promised games like Resident Evil and then never delivered.). Only reason MH wasnot on the DS was because the DS couldn't handle it like the PSP. I wouldn't expect much of anything from Capcom on the Vita now that they've gotten their fighting game ports out of the way.

Yeah but at that time Sony was at their prime! The time before they started loosing money...
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] That is why they should have bought the MH franchise! STUPID SONY

Capcom would NEVER sell Monster Hunter to anyone unless they were going out of business. Capcom barely supported the PSP (They even promised games like Resident Evil and then never delivered.). Only reason MH wasnot on the DS was because the DS couldn't handle it like the PSP. I wouldn't expect much of anything from Capcom on the Vita now that they've gotten their fighting game ports out of the way.

Yeah but at that time Sony was at their prime! The time before they started loosing money...

People are just going to have to face it. The Vita will not get going until maybe 2014-2015 like the PSP and PS3. It took a good 2-3 years before their install bases got high enough for developers to feel confident enough to do system exclusives on them. Sony just haven't learned anything from those two systems which is a shame.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Capcom would NEVER sell Monster Hunter to anyone unless they were going out of business. Capcom barely supported the PSP (They even promised games like Resident Evil and then never delivered.). Only reason MH wasnot on the DS was because the DS couldn't handle it like the PSP. I wouldn't expect much of anything from Capcom on the Vita now that they've gotten their fighting game ports out of the way.

Yeah but at that time Sony was at their prime! The time before they started loosing money...

People are just going to have to face it. The Vita will not get going until maybe 2014-2015 like the PSP and PS3. It took a good 2-3 years before their install bases got high enough for developers to feel confident enough to do system exclusives on them. Sony just haven't learned anything from those two systems which is a shame.

Indeed! Why don't they use their first party developers? Do Nintendo use their FPD? If so why the hell wouldn't Sony do that
Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts

that must be some contact capcom signed with nintendo..wonder how much they are getting

lawlessx
Help with marketing in the West.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] Yeah but at that time Sony was at their prime! The time before they started loosing money...

People are just going to have to face it. The Vita will not get going until maybe 2014-2015 like the PSP and PS3. It took a good 2-3 years before their install bases got high enough for developers to feel confident enough to do system exclusives on them. Sony just haven't learned anything from those two systems which is a shame.

Indeed! Why don't they use their first party developers? Do Nintendo use their FPD? If so why the hell wouldn't Sony do that

Sony ARE using their 1st party developers. The only high quality exclusives coming out for the PS Vita in 2013 so far (Killzone Mercenaries / Soul Sacrifice / Tearaway) are Sony funded and / or developed games. Problem is Sonys 1st party aren't system sellers even though they're high quality games.Sony marketing also sucks. Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.
Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Good thing most of their stuff is usually of high quality. I think you forgot that part.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] People are just going to have to face it. The Vita will not get going until maybe 2014-2015 like the PSP and PS3. It took a good 2-3 years before their install bases got high enough for developers to feel confident enough to do system exclusives on them. Sony just haven't learned anything from those two systems which is a shame.

Indeed! Why don't they use their first party developers? Do Nintendo use their FPD? If so why the hell wouldn't Sony do that

Sony ARE using their 1st party developers. The only high quality exclusives coming out for the PS Vita in 2013 so far (Killzone Mercenaries / Soul Sacrifice / Tearaway) are Sony funded and / or developed games. Problem is Sonys 1st party aren't system sellers even though they're high quality games.Sony marketing also sucks. Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Barely using their first party... Cambridge, Japan & media molecule! That's 3 of apparently 13 studios... Does that seem like they are trying? And Sony could totally play off Nostalgia as-well but they refuse to do it it seems! Release Jak & Daxter 4 on vita alone, Continue the R&C on the vita, Sly 4 should have only released on the Vita as-well :/ God of war Ascension should have been a Vita game... :/ why would we need 2 God of wars on the ps3? Especially if they are going to release PS4 within a year
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#67 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]cows am crymusicalmac
Vita owners am cry. It's some disappointing news if true.

Unless if you have a 3DS.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

Ill take Soul Sacrafice over Monster Hunter Vita any day. Im sorry I use to Love capcom but they have really droped the ball lately. On disk DLC, ruining both RE and DMC and now this. I guess I should be to worried though since all there top talent keeps leaving them.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.ShuichiChamp24
Good thing most of their stuff is usually of high quality. I think you forgot that part.

Except there Hardware wich is about 5 years behind everyone else.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Capcom: "RE4 on the Gamecube only"
Capcom: "RE4announced on the PS2 before the NGC version launches"

Moral, who ever believes what Capcom says about anything?

nintendoboy16

Well, Tatsunoko vs Capcom didn't (and never will) get ported to PS3 and 360.

lol who cares when they got the Superior Marvel vs Capcom.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="ShuichiChamp24"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Good thing most of their stuff is usually of high quality. I think you forgot that part.

Most? I don't think so. Maybe about half unless you want to dismiss all the spin-offs which count towards franchises as well.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] Indeed! Why don't they use their first party developers? Do Nintendo use their FPD? If so why the hell wouldn't Sony do that

Sony ARE using their 1st party developers. The only high quality exclusives coming out for the PS Vita in 2013 so far (Killzone Mercenaries / Soul Sacrifice / Tearaway) are Sony funded and / or developed games. Problem is Sonys 1st party aren't system sellers even though they're high quality games.Sony marketing also sucks. Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Barely using their first party... Cambridge, Japan & media molecule! That's 3 of apparently 13 studios... Does that seem like they are trying? And Sony could totally play off Nostalgia as-well but they refuse to do it it seems! Release Jak & Daxter 4 on vita alone, Continue the R&C on the vita, Sly 4 should have only released on the Vita as-well :/ God of war Ascension should have been a Vita game... :/ why would we need 2 God of wars on the ps3? Especially if they are going to release PS4 within a year

No company is going to have EVERY studio working on one platform. Nintendo doesn't have all their developers on the 3DS. There are some making Wii-U games right now. Sony had Zipper make Unit 13 and Liverpool made Wipeout 2048 for Vita before those studios got closed down. Sony bend did Uncharted: GA: Team Ico are still struggling with The Last Guardian. PD if not working on a Gran Turismo Vita game are gearing up for Gran Turismo 6 on PS4. Jak & Ratchet while high quality series aren't system sellers and Sony also doesn't own Insomniac for Ratchet. Sucker Punch is working on something but we don't know what it is. Releasing Sly 4 only on Vita wouldn't do much either since it's much less known then Ratchet or Jak. God Of War I agree with though.
Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts

Most? I don't think so. Maybe about half unless you want to dismiss all the spin-offs which count towards franchises as well.FlamesOfGrey
Seeing how this will most likely end in a opinion thing i'll just leave it alone here.

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] People are just going to have to face it. The Vita will not get going until maybe 2014-2015 like the PSP and PS3. It took a good 2-3 years before their install bases got high enough for developers to feel confident enough to do system exclusives on them. Sony just haven't learned anything from those two systems which is a shame.FlamesOfGrey
Indeed! Why don't they use their first party developers? Do Nintendo use their FPD? If so why the hell wouldn't Sony do that

Sony ARE using their 1st party developers. The only high quality exclusives coming out for the PS Vita in 2013 so far (Killzone Mercenaries / Soul Sacrifice / Tearaway) are Sony funded and / or developed games. Problem is Sonys 1st party aren't system sellers even though they're high quality games.Sony marketing also sucks. Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Spot on post once again.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Most? I don't think so. Maybe about half unless you want to dismiss all the spin-offs which count towards franchises as well.ShuichiChamp24

Seeing how this will most likely end in a opinion thing i'll just leave it alone here.

Good idea.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Sony ARE using their 1st party developers. The only high quality exclusives coming out for the PS Vita in 2013 so far (Killzone Mercenaries / Soul Sacrifice / Tearaway) are Sony funded and / or developed games. Problem is Sonys 1st party aren't system sellers even though they're high quality games.Sony marketing also sucks. Nintendo not only has casual appeal on their side, they also have the nostalgia factor with franchises like Mario, Pokemon and Zelda. People will buy those franchises regardless of quality. Add that in with their marketing and Nintendo always knows they have something that will sell regardless.

Barely using their first party... Cambridge, Japan & media molecule! That's 3 of apparently 13 studios... Does that seem like they are trying? And Sony could totally play off Nostalgia as-well but they refuse to do it it seems! Release Jak & Daxter 4 on vita alone, Continue the R&C on the vita, Sly 4 should have only released on the Vita as-well :/ God of war Ascension should have been a Vita game... :/ why would we need 2 God of wars on the ps3? Especially if they are going to release PS4 within a year

No company is going to have EVERY studio working on one platform. Nintendo doesn't have all their developers on the 3DS. There are some making Wii-U games right now. Sony had Zipper make Unit 13 and Liverpool made Wipeout 2048 for Vita before those studios got closed down. Sony bend did Uncharted: GA: Team Ico are still struggling with The Last Guardian. PD if not working on a Gran Turismo Vita game are gearing up for Gran Turismo 6 on PS4. Jak & Ratchet while high quality series aren't system sellers and Sony also doesn't own Insomniac for Ratchet. Sucker Punch is working on something but we don't know what it is. Releasing Sly 4 only on Vita wouldn't do much either since it's much less known then Ratchet or Jak. God Of War I agree with though.

But they own the R&C Franchise & i didn't mean that they should use every studio :P i meant that they should use more studios to create new/existing franchises so the vita can stabilize before releasing the ps4. So they don't have to drag the Vita while trying to sell the PS4 at the same time
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] Barely using their first party... Cambridge, Japan & media molecule! That's 3 of apparently 13 studios... Does that seem like they are trying? And Sony could totally play off Nostalgia as-well but they refuse to do it it seems! Release Jak & Daxter 4 on vita alone, Continue the R&C on the vita, Sly 4 should have only released on the Vita as-well :/ God of war Ascension should have been a Vita game... :/ why would we need 2 God of wars on the ps3? Especially if they are going to release PS4 within a year

No company is going to have EVERY studio working on one platform. Nintendo doesn't have all their developers on the 3DS. There are some making Wii-U games right now. Sony had Zipper make Unit 13 and Liverpool made Wipeout 2048 for Vita before those studios got closed down. Sony bend did Uncharted: GA: Team Ico are still struggling with The Last Guardian. PD if not working on a Gran Turismo Vita game are gearing up for Gran Turismo 6 on PS4. Jak & Ratchet while high quality series aren't system sellers and Sony also doesn't own Insomniac for Ratchet. Sucker Punch is working on something but we don't know what it is. Releasing Sly 4 only on Vita wouldn't do much either since it's much less known then Ratchet or Jak. God Of War I agree with though.

But they own the R&C Franchise & i didn't mean that they should use every studio :P i meant that they should use more studios to create new/existing franchises so the vita can stabilize before releasing the ps4. So they don't have to drag the Vita while trying to sell the PS4 at the same time

I think they're doing all they can right now in regards to 1st party unlike Nintendo & Microsoft, Sony doesn't abandon core development for their systems until a couple years after the next one has come out so the PS3 will be seeing alot of support well into 2014 from Sony's 1st party. Sony needs to buy some 3rd party exclusives but they don't seme to be willing to do that. They just give developers the Vita kits and say make something so, 3rd parties are just doing ports until the Vita's userbase gets a few more million under it's belt.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] No company is going to have EVERY studio working on one platform. Nintendo doesn't have all their developers on the 3DS. There are some making Wii-U games right now. Sony had Zipper make Unit 13 and Liverpool made Wipeout 2048 for Vita before those studios got closed down. Sony bend did Uncharted: GA: Team Ico are still struggling with The Last Guardian. PD if not working on a Gran Turismo Vita game are gearing up for Gran Turismo 6 on PS4. Jak & Ratchet while high quality series aren't system sellers and Sony also doesn't own Insomniac for Ratchet. Sucker Punch is working on something but we don't know what it is. Releasing Sly 4 only on Vita wouldn't do much either since it's much less known then Ratchet or Jak. God Of War I agree with though.

But they own the R&C Franchise & i didn't mean that they should use every studio :P i meant that they should use more studios to create new/existing franchises so the vita can stabilize before releasing the ps4. So they don't have to drag the Vita while trying to sell the PS4 at the same time

I think they're doing all they can right now in regards to 1st party unlike Nintendo & Microsoft, Sony doesn't abandon core development for their systems until a couple years after the next one has come out so the PS3 will be seeing alot of support well into 2014 from Sony's 1st party. Sony needs to buy some 3rd party exclusives but they don't seme to be willing to do that. They just give developers the Vita kits and say make something so, 3rd parties are just doing ports until the Vita's userbase gets a few more million under it's belt.

Which is sad because they pumped so many exclusives on the ps3 to save it and it worked... Now they release a handheld with ports and then just leave it on the corner.. I haven't given up hope yet but it just sucks that they are making the same mistake as the psp & the ps3...
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] But they own the R&C Franchise & i didn't mean that they should use every studio :P i meant that they should use more studios to create new/existing franchises so the vita can stabilize before releasing the ps4. So they don't have to drag the Vita while trying to sell the PS4 at the same time

I think they're doing all they can right now in regards to 1st party unlike Nintendo & Microsoft, Sony doesn't abandon core development for their systems until a couple years after the next one has come out so the PS3 will be seeing alot of support well into 2014 from Sony's 1st party. Sony needs to buy some 3rd party exclusives but they don't seme to be willing to do that. They just give developers the Vita kits and say make something so, 3rd parties are just doing ports until the Vita's userbase gets a few more million under it's belt.

Which is sad because they pumped so many exclusives on the ps3 to save it and it worked... Now they release a handheld with ports and then just leave it on the corner.. I haven't given up hope yet but it just sucks that they are making the same mistake as the psp & the ps3...

Well at least in the end the PSP & PS3 turned out to have great libraries in the end.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] I think they're doing all they can right now in regards to 1st party unlike Nintendo & Microsoft, Sony doesn't abandon core development for their systems until a couple years after the next one has come out so the PS3 will be seeing alot of support well into 2014 from Sony's 1st party. Sony needs to buy some 3rd party exclusives but they don't seme to be willing to do that. They just give developers the Vita kits and say make something so, 3rd parties are just doing ports until the Vita's userbase gets a few more million under it's belt.

Which is sad because they pumped so many exclusives on the ps3 to save it and it worked... Now they release a handheld with ports and then just leave it on the corner.. I haven't given up hope yet but it just sucks that they are making the same mistake as the psp & the ps3...

Well at least in the end the PSP & PS3 turned out to have great libraries in the end.

That is true... But i don't like to sit and cross my fingers for 6 to 12 months hoping :/ I mean hell i bought two Psvitas so i could play with my brother but he barely touches it while i barely touch my ps3 atm :P
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] Which is sad because they pumped so many exclusives on the ps3 to save it and it worked... Now they release a handheld with ports and then just leave it on the corner.. I haven't given up hope yet but it just sucks that they are making the same mistake as the psp & the ps3...

Well at least in the end the PSP & PS3 turned out to have great libraries in the end.

That is true... But i don't like to sit and cross my fingers for 6 to 12 months hoping :/ I mean hell i bought two Psvitas so i could play with my brother but he barely touches it while i barely touch my ps3 atm :P

Yeah, it's never a good thing to buy a system at launch if you're not a patient person. We'll see what Sony does but right now I don't even think they know.
Avatar image for Hoznary
Hoznary

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Hoznary
Member since 2006 • 539 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Well at least in the end the PSP & PS3 turned out to have great libraries in the end.

That is true... But i don't like to sit and cross my fingers for 6 to 12 months hoping :/ I mean hell i bought two Psvitas so i could play with my brother but he barely touches it while i barely touch my ps3 atm :P

Yeah, it's never a good thing to buy a system at launch if you're not a patient person. We'll see what Sony does but right now I don't even think they know.

I am patient but they sure as hell are taking their time :/
Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts
Recently, a rumor surfaced saying this very thing was the reason for the 3DS delay and that Capcom was developing a Vita version in tandem with the 3DS. 'I would not believe everything you read on the internet. It will set you up for disappointment or misdirected frustration.'rjdofu
Your sig is too awesome.:shock:
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Hoznary"] That is true... But i don't like to sit and cross my fingers for 6 to 12 months hoping :/ I mean hell i bought two Psvitas so i could play with my brother but he barely touches it while i barely touch my ps3 atm :P

Yeah, it's never a good thing to buy a system at launch if you're not a patient person. We'll see what Sony does but right now I don't even think they know.

I am patient but they sure as hell are taking their time :/

Launch year was great IMO. Tons of variety. Yeah, they were some flops like COD but that's any system. 2013 is looking slow for exclusive titles but I'm an importer and looking forward to playing games like Tales Of Hearts R and Muramasa Vita.
Avatar image for TheEpicGoat
TheEpicGoat

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 TheEpicGoat
Member since 2011 • 2006 Posts

> Games

> Vita

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#86 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts

Cows: tumblr_mes47rr5bK1r3zat8.gif

Avatar image for caryslan2
caryslan2

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 caryslan2
Member since 2005 • 2486 Posts

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

I also agree with the sentiment that the Vita needs a system seller. It needs one, and fast.

Thefatness16

With Mario(Obviously), Pokemon(Obviously), Animal Crossing(Obviously), Dragon Quest, Monster Hunter locked up, Final Fantasy is the only system seller left. If Nintendo announces a mainline spin off FF game like Crisis Core or Type 0, there really isn't anything left that could save the Vita.

The best thing Sony could hope for is if one of thier new IP's become a smash hit.

If they could figure out a way to market the Vita to western gamers in Europe and NA, and create games that appeal to gamers in those regions, Sony may have a shot of surviving even if they lose Japan. Monster Hunter, Dragon Quest, and Animal Crossing are not major system sellers in the west, and their impact is minor at best here. Which means Sony might have a better shot of winning the west since most of the major system sellers that are appearing on the 3DS really don't have much of an impact outside of Japan.

The key is for Sony to get major western developers to take the Vita seriously. Call of Duty on a handheld is an excellent idea on paper that fell apart due to Activision blowing the job. What the Vita needs are strong titles that make it look good compared to the 3DS. They ned games that are more than rushed ports of home console games.

If Sony can't win Japan or even get a decent showing in second, than the handheld is not quite dead. The 3DS is still not fully established in the West and while it is a decent seller, its not matching the sales in Japan. And many of the system sellers in Japan like Monster Hunter, and Dragon Quest are irrevlant in the West. They sell decently, but they are far from being system sellers over here.

Of course, the shadow of Mario and Pokemon will still be a challenge for Sony, so it's still an uphill battle. But if they could get something established in the West, they may still have a chance even if the Vita fails in Japan. The issue is getting the support that they need.

Avatar image for NeonNinja
NeonNinja

17318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 115

User Lists: 0

#88 NeonNinja
Member since 2005 • 17318 Posts

Capcom: "RE4 on the Gamecube only"
Capcom: "RE4announced on the PS2 before the NGC version launches"

Moral, who ever believes what Capcom says about anything?

ActicEdge

Correction

Shinji Mikami: "I will cut my head off if RE4 does not remain exclusive."

Capcom: "Yeah, we're liking the PS2 from here, actually."

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#89 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41534 Posts

[QUOTE="joel_c17"]The game suits the vita so much more than the 3ds - i can still play it on my 3ds but i would prefer the extra analogue stick Hoznary
... The first six games where released on Sony's console... Why the hell didn't they pay capcom to keep it exclusive to the portable brand? this was when ps2 was the bomb and leading console

Same could have been said with Nintendo and Square's Final Fantasy, but look who paid for that when PlayStation came along (outside of N64's bottlenecks, of course).

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

Well screw you too, crapcom !

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Launch year was great IMO. Tons of variety. Yeah, they were some flops like COD but that's any system. 2013 is looking slow for exclusive titles but I'm an importer and looking forward to playing games like Tales Of Hearts R and Muramasa Vita.

Cod didn't' become a system seller like people wanted but it's in 2nd place and my favorite and most played game so far. It's also the most common game I see friends playing.
Avatar image for dobzilian
dobzilian

3409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 dobzilian
Member since 2012 • 3409 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]Capcom: "RE4 on the Gamecube only"
Capcom: "RE4announced on the PS2 before the NGC version launches"Moral, who ever believes what Capcom says about anything?AM-Gamer
Well, Tatsunoko vs Capcom didn't (and never will) get ported to PS3 and 360.

lol who cares when they got the Superior Marvel vs Capcom.



lmao... quality post. kudos to you for being such a funny little dude.

tats vs cap - epilepsy enducing
mar vs cap - sleep enducing

I gave away mar vs cap 3 as even nostalgia for the series could not make me enjoy the 3rd installment and its slow gameplay. I was spoiled with the eye-pounding, epilepsy causing, fast paced game play of tats vs cap. Kinda bad that even my sisters kids rather play tats vs cap rather than marvel vs capcom even though they only knew Ryu and chun li but know all the marvel characters.

Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

This is terrible news and I'm honestly disappointed we wont see any MH game anytime soon on PSV..

I mean this with no intention to bash the 3DS but would have loved to see what MH would look like on the PSV which surely can produce better visuals.. Also with 2 x analog sticks & touch controls would have been great for this game..

Avatar image for dobzilian
dobzilian

3409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 dobzilian
Member since 2012 • 3409 Posts

This is terrible news and I'm honestly disappointed we wont see any MH game anytime soon on PSV..I mean this with no intention to bash the 3DS but would have loved to see what MH would look like on the PSV which surely can produce better visuals.. Also with 2 x analog sticks & touch controls would have been great for this game..Malta_1980


always the wii-u version. its a port so it will only look like a up-res'd wii game. theirs the attachment which adds a 2nd analog stick like how you got a pad with wii version. Touch screen controls would add very little.

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts
That sucks for japan and vita there but I'm sure there are alternatives. Mh can't be the only game japan plays.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

[QUOTE="Malta_1980"]This is terrible news and I'm honestly disappointed we wont see any MH game anytime soon on PSV..I mean this with no intention to bash the 3DS but would have loved to see what MH would look like on the PSV which surely can produce better visuals.. Also with 2 x analog sticks & touch controls would have been great for this game..dobzilian



always the wii-u version. its a port so it will only look like a up-res'd wii game. theirs the attachment which adds a 2nd analog stick like how you got a pad with wii version. Touch screen controls would add very little.

i know what you mean, but being used to MH games on PSP I was really looking forward to continue playing the series on PSV :(