This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Il_Exile_lI"]The xbox was the only console that would be able to run it last gen, so I am not sure if the Wii could. I do not know the exact specs, but the Wii isn't really much more powerful than a GC is it?ogvampire
it's supposedly 2x more powerful than the GC
Im find that hard to believe. The only game I have seen on Wii that I was sure couldn't be done on the GC is Mario Galaxy.
[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Il_Exile_lI"]The xbox was the only console that would be able to run it last gen, so I am not sure if the Wii could. I do not know the exact specs, but the Wii isn't really much more powerful than a GC is it?Il_Exile_lI
it's supposedly 2x more powerful than the GC
Im find that hard to believe. The only game I have seen on Wii that I was sure couldn't be done on the GC is Mario Galaxy.
Ande Galaxy isnt really pushing the system at all
[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Il_Exile_lI"]The xbox was the only console that would be able to run it last gen, so I am not sure if the Wii could. I do not know the exact specs, but the Wii isn't really much more powerful than a GC is it?Il_Exile_lI
it's supposedly 2x more powerful than the GC
Im find that hard to believe. The only game I have seen on Wii that I was sure couldn't be done on the GC is Mario Galaxy.
correction: its actually 1.5x more powerful than GC, not 2x
[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"][QUOTE="nintendog66"] since the Wii is much more powerfull than an Xbox(1)fazares
no its not, at best its equal
its more powerful....it can supports way better shaders and poly counts...and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
Galaxy is sooo darn sexy. Man, what a perfect gaming experience that was.BioShockOwnz
BEST GAME THIS GEN FOR ME :D
and it went straight to my Top 10 favourite games. I cant praise its awesomeness enough
and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
VendettaRed07
:lol:
[QUOTE="fazares"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"][QUOTE="nintendog66"] since the Wii is much more powerfull than an Xbox(1)VendettaRed07
no its not, at best its equal
its more powerful....it can supports way better shaders and poly counts...and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
Conker doesnt even run at 60 fps. Whether Galaxy its better than Ninja Gaiden is debatable because of the completely different artsyles[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
Fawlcon_Pawnch
:lol:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/6560.html?type=
Conker looks better than galaxy i think, its not laughable at all
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
VendettaRed07
:lol:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/6560.html?type=
Conker looks better than galaxy i think, its not laughable at all
Geometry is way lower than Galaxy, it doesnt run at 60 fps and it overuses bloom and blur, an easy trick to make a game look better, like Black on the PS2. Galaxy also uses better shaders and effects
[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"][QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
Fawlcon_Pawnch
:lol:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/6560.html?type=
Conker looks better than galaxy i think, its not laughable at all
Geometry is way lower than Galaxy, it doesnt run at 60 fps and it overuses bloom and blur, an easy trick to make a game look better, like Black on the PS2. Galaxy also uses better shaders and effects
? galaxy overuses bloom also.. and the lighting and textures are better in conker. Same with the draw distance, sometimes in galaxy platforms get super pixelated if they are far away. It also has alot of jaggies, even though you cant notice it in motion its very obvious in most pics
Oh boy...everyone says it has so much power, yet most games look really bad. Only visual style the Wii has going for it is Galaxy. Even games with good graphics have square hands and jaggies.
And more importantly, it wouldn't sell because it's rated M. Look at NMH.
Oh boy...everyone says it has so much power, yet most games look really bad. Only visual style the Wii has going for it is Galaxy. Even games with good graphics have square hands and jaggies.
And more importantly, it wouldn't sell because it's rated M. Look at NMH.
Mau-Justice
actually, NMH is Suda51's best selling game
[QUOTE="Mau-Justice"]Oh boy...everyone says it has so much power, yet most games look really bad. Only visual style the Wii has going for it is Galaxy. Even games with good graphics have square hands and jaggies.
And more importantly, it wouldn't sell because it's rated M. Look at NMH.
ogvampire
actually, NMH is Suda51's best selling game
Yes it is.
He pwnd himself lol
Thats the consoles faultcause we know how developers have nothing to do with how their games lookOh boy...everyone says it has so much power, yet most games look really bad. Only visual ****the Wii has going for it is Galaxy. Even games with good graphics have square hands and jaggies.
And more importantly, it wouldn't sell because it's rated M. Look at NMH.
Mau-Justice
Click Link
Count your chickens before you put them in the truck
holy crap Fawlcon_Pawnch thats a lot of pics. lol. Ill find another game for you tommorow that will put those pics to shame. muhahahapunkrocker163
Bring it on!!:D
HEEEEERE COMES THE GALAXY SCREENSHOT AVALANCHE!!!!! constant 60 fps and its not even pushing the system to the max
Fawlcon_Pawnch
thats because that damn game is all simple shapes and simple textures....
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"][QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]and yet we still dont have any proof of that
the wii is just an overclocked gamecube, if it truely was more powerful than the xbox we would see alot of proof of it, instead its just galaxy which imo doesnt look as good as conker live and reloaded or ninja gaiden
VendettaRed07
:lol:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/6560.html?type=
Conker looks better than galaxy i think, its not laughable at all
Geometry is way lower than Galaxy, it doesnt run at 60 fps and it overuses bloom and blur, an easy trick to make a game look better, like Black on the PS2. Galaxy also uses better shaders and effects
? galaxy overuses bloom also.. and the lighting and textures are better in conker. Same with the draw distance, sometimes in galaxy platforms get super pixelated if they are far away. It also has alot of jaggies, even though you cant notice it in motion its very obvious in most pics
again 60 FPS versus 30 FPSas for textures being better
vs.
thats because that damn game is all simple shapes and simple textures....
supermechakirby
lol I'm not even going to wast my time, just play the game yourself and you will see why your post Fails
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]HEEEEERE COMES THE GALAXY SCREENSHOT AVALANCHE!!!!! constant 60 fps and its not even pushing the system to the max
supermechakirby
thats because that damn game is all simple shapes and simple textures....
Next time, lay out a fact sheet before you start making BS claims? galaxy overuses bloom also.. and the lighting and textures are better in conker. Same with the draw distance, sometimes in galaxy platforms get super pixelated if they are far away. It also has alot of jaggies, even though you cant notice it in motion its very obvious in most pics
VendettaRed07
Super pixelated, i dont know what TV you are using but in mine Galaxy doesnt look pixelated at all and Galaxy's draw distance completely dumps on Conker's
As for jaggies, like you said in motion you dont see them, just like Conker
PS: I loved Conker's BFD on the N64, this discussion is making me feel like i'm saying its bad
I'm going to have to go with absolutely not. I think Mario galaxy is impressive looking, but that is more as a result of the artistic style it's given. Ninja Gaiden is an incredibly fast paced game, and many of the effects aren't capable of being done on the Wii while maintaining the fluidiity of it all.
Sorry, but my vote is no.
I'm going to have to go with absolutely not. I think Mario galaxy is impressive looking, but that is more as a result of the artistic style it's given. Ninja Gaiden is an incredibly fast paced game, and many of the effects aren't capable of being done on the Wii while maintaining the fluidiity of it all.
Sorry, but my vote is no.
HappyAppe
OK people, start packing your stuff, the guy who built the Wii's hardware has spoken. Lets keep to ourselves our inferior knowledge and opinions and listen to the truth.
[QUOTE="HappyAppe"]I'm going to have to go with absolutely not. I think Mario galaxy is impressive looking, but that is more as a result of the artistic style it's given. Ninja Gaiden is an incredibly fast paced game, and many of the effects aren't capable of being done on the Wii while maintaining the fluidiity of it all.
Sorry, but my vote is no.
Fawlcon_Pawnch
OK people, start packing your stuff, the guy who built the Wii's hardware has spoken. Lets keep to ourselves our inferior knowledge and opinions and listen to the truth.
I thought this was a thread regarding whether we thought the Wii could run Ninja Gaiden Black? Am I in the wrong place?
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"][QUOTE="HappyAppe"]I'm going to have to go with absolutely not. I think Mario galaxy is impressive looking, but that is more as a result of the artistic style it's given. Ninja Gaiden is an incredibly fast paced game, and many of the effects aren't capable of being done on the Wii while maintaining the fluidiity of it all.
Sorry, but my vote is no.
HappyAppe
OK people, start packing your stuff, the guy who built the Wii's hardware has spoken. Lets keep to ourselves our inferior knowledge and opinions and listen to the truth.
I thought this was a thread regarding whether we thought the Wii could run Ninja Gaiden Black? Am I in the wrong place?
You are if you start claiming what the Wii can and cant do without knowing
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]HEEEEERE COMES THE GALAXY SCREENSHOT AVALANCHE!!!!! constant 60 fps and its not even pushing the system to the max
supermechakirby
thats because that damn game is all simple shapes and simple textures....
Wow...this is almost sig worthy.
the poll is close....anyone have any ideas for what i can use for later episodes?(as i like to call them. lol)
I wanna put those SMG pics to shame.
[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]HEEEEERE COMES THE GALAXY SCREENSHOT AVALANCHE!!!!! constant 60 fps and its not even pushing the system to the max
supermechakirby
thats because that damn game is all simple shapes and simple textures....
yeah, games that have crap graphics dont go straight to the cnet top 5 games of all time. Quit living in denial. Any1 who say galaxy looks bad is delusional.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment