A thread about an inferior game of an old PC shooter that has been played to hell and back. On top of that, it's started by a console fanboy. Yea, I've never seen this before. :roll:
1. They are making the PC version of 1943 32 players rather than just 24.
2. The main reason it's taking longer, which rarely happens, is the frostbite engine was actually built around consoles (which was the main focus of Bad Company despite the fact that it sold terribly on consoles, hence, BC2 is going to PC to increase sales drastically). They have to optimize it for PC. Considering there's even more players in the PC version this is understandable.
3. What's with the PC bashing? Seriously, PC has the biggest back library and the largest amount of exclusives in the future (yes, it's true, look for yourself). On top of that you can get a $600 gaming PC that outperforms the PS3/360 by 3x at least. PC has the best graphics, best version of multiplats (not even mentioning exclusives), mods, KB/Mouse, and basically gets all the worthwhile games on consoles as well as the most exclusives and tons of indie games. Most games are released simultaneously on everything if they are multiplat and the PC always has the superior version.
4. This thread was started by a console fanboy. Nuff' said. So the insecurity the console fanboys have rolls on...
and most importantly...
5. Battlefield 1942 is far superior to 1943. Yes, I own 1943. It isn't even half the game 1942 is. And, as with most PC games, 1942 is still heavily played online. TC fails.
Log in to comment