Assassin's Creed Valhalla will run at at least 30fps on the Series X

Ubisoft has always been committed to exploring new technologies, taking advantage of the capabilities of new consoles to deliver the most immersive experience possible, which is why we are excited to be collaborating with Microsoft to bring Assassin's Creed Valhalla to the Xbox Series X.

Currently, we can guarantee that Assassin's Creed Valhalla will run at least 30 FPS. Assassin's Creed Valhalla will benefit from faster loading times, allowing players to immerse themselves in history and the world without friction. Finally, Assassin's Creed Valhalla will benefit from improved graphics made possible by the Xbox Series X, and we can't wait to see the beautiful world we're creating in stunning 4K resolution.

We will have a lot more to show you about Assassin's Creed Valhalla in the near future, so stay tuned for more information soon.

Source

Lame, these next gen games have been Meh looking so far.

It has begun. The great compromise has started. But seriously though. There are games that still have a hard time reaching 4K/60 Ultra on a 2080ti, I'm not gonna expect it out of a console much. Not on big AAAs anyway.

It was always going to be 4K/60 and 1080p/60. Multi plats were never going to leverage the Xs power, it questionable whether their GPU could do it anyway. Ubi will probably throw in some RT, in which case 60 fps will never happen on consoles.

@BenjaminBanklin: Ultra is a meme.

The issue is too much focus on 4K instead of 60fps. Going to higher resolutions without having games running properly at lower resolutions is just dumb.

lol 30fps. Saw that coming a mile away. AC: Unity all over again.

PS5 is next.

understandable, not enough performance in these boxes to get 4k 60fps going at any decent quality.

Wouldn't be shocked if the PS5 will sit at 1440p.

That's expected. Early gen multiplats are essentially last gen ports for the first few months.

I think this bull crap there is no way or no reason they can't get 60fps even at 4k. so is the xbox one x version be at 1080p/30fps? or the pro. how much of a graphically leap is this game having from last gen to next gen that the xbox one x or pro can't do 4k/30fps. this is what happens when you budget a game that is coded on 6 different systems systems. not including the xbox one x and pro so total 8 systems.

@gifford38: They said "at least 30". Maybe it averages 50fps at 4K on the SX and 30fps at 1440p on the X1X but with much lower graphics quality? Would be 1080p on the Pro. 900p on the PS4 and 720p on the OG Xbox.

Impossible Ronvalencia showed me a chart of Forza Horizon at 120FPS.

to many last gen systems and next gen to be coding for. for only one game. it takes to much resources and time so they can't spend time on next gen systems to get them running right as first party does.

if forza can be 4k/120fps why not a assassin creed game.

this is why i like sony approach keep next gen games on one system to fully optimize it.

plus once they drop last gen these games will run better for third party devs.

not really surprised

most next gen console games will run at 30fps

@gifford38: The technical scope of the game is what determines how well it will run. Forza Motorsport is not demanding and very easy to run. An open world game like Assassin's Creed or Red Dead Redemption is much more complex and demanding.

Where are all the lems?

Lol. Ron loved playing up Forza to prove the X1X was faster than a 1070 by bringing some shit about wet tracks. Then you realized in real-life scenarios it lost to the 1070 most of the time.

Forza Horizon 4 is also a racing game from what? 2018? Compared to an open-world RPG of late 2020. There's a huge difference in the resources they demand.

Just read it was confirmed there is no RT on next gen.

30 frames on Series X, 20 on PS5.

lol 30fps. Peasants.

I was gonna get Valhalla on PC anyways. But anyhow, like I said in another thread, console developers will always shoot for higher graphics then better performance so this is nothing new.

I'm sorry but that's just how the gaming world works. Which is why I game on PC for freedom of choice.

Kinda worrying with the wording. Makes me feel like frames are sporadic at the moment. This is why I left consoles behind, except for exclusives. Yeah, PC can get sporadic framerates, but I can tailor to what I need... That being said, Origins was dodgy on release, mainly when hitting high-pop areas.

Maybe but that would probably mean lower a few pixels or settings in some parts.

Alto i don't think it will be 10FPS on a game like this.

Yeah the majority of PC will not even hit that in 4k.

That doesn't account for people who can. Enough with the majority shit... It's boring. Pro vs OG, or X vs OG, the arguments are the same.

That being said, this is Ubi, and their ventures into PC can be hit and miss.

Welp, there goes 60FPS at 4k... well for Ubsioft games.

So much for 4K / 120fps...

I was told there would be 4k60 with RT so beautifully done it will make you weep. What happened?

RT tanks performance, a 2080ti cannot do it. But perhaps Super Phil can make it happen.

I assume Origins & Odyssey were 30fps and I enjoyed those games so I will have no probs with this one at 30 either.

4k/60 on the Xbox series x

4k/30 on the ps5

A real open world game in native 4k for ps players for the first time,exiting stuff

@bluestars: 4k/30* on the Xbox series x

UGH why does it have to be native 4k?

checkerboard that sum'bitch to achieve the 60fps!

"Currently, we can guarantee that Assassin's Creed Valhalla will run at least 30 FPS"

ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL what kind of guarantee is that???

I think a 10.52Tflop machine should target no more than 1440p resolution, so that developers could give 1600-1800p (2.6k - 3.2k) to XSX's 12 Tflop machine and a potential PS5 gets 4K.

More focus on shaders, textures, polygons etc...

@hardwenzen said:

"Currently, we can guarantee that Assassin's Creed Valhalla will run at least 30 FPS"

ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL what kind of guarantee is that???

Yeah exactly, what did they think we were expecting? 20fps?

Ubisoft will probably downgrade the graphics on top of it.

@fedor:

I’ve already told you 4k60,dry your eyes

HaH

It doesn't matter what you say. 4k/30... Facts, can't beat them.

Fact is the Series X would be running the game above 4k @ 30FPS.

I've been violently refuted.

If they're aiming for 30fps, they better have maxed settings. There's no way a last gen game like this wouldn't be maxed with over 12tflops of juice.

30fps and NO ray tracing. I almost feel bad for console only gamers. Almost

I don't think it's that they can't do 60fps, but if they can make the game look better at 30fps than not as good at 60fps, I think they'll go with doing 30fps because they think that's what people want.

*slow clap*

Woooooooo. 30 FPS? Better slow down there, folks!

30! Woweeeeee. That surrrrrrrre is fast.

And, as usual, my question is: what is sacrificed for 30+ fps? Texture resolution? All fancy MSPITAXAA anti-alienizing and stuff? Poster-processing? Seriously I don't care if it's 4K and 30 FPS; if everything is muddled and hazy looking, it ain't worth it.

Oh, you know, a "current" one. As in, they gave themselves an out, like "at the time it was 30+ fps, but now it isn't, so we didn't lie".

They do it to themselves, so I don't feel sorry.

If they simply would repent, drown their console in the blood of a goat, and spend 10,000 dollars on a PC to start playing 2D early-access indie titles, they'd be so so so so so happy.

@bluestars: 35 on XSX, 30 on PS5. That takes into account the power difference. It'll load 50% faster on PS5 though.

Hopefully developers will put in options to adjust performance but I’m fine with this either way.

I hope they include a "performance" mode for people who'd rather play at higher framerates at the cost of resolution

I think it was to be taken as more of a "duh" and joke moment.

@bluestars: you guys are clowns for insinuating differences on cross gen games. Can't tell if fanboys are that dumb or that insecure.