AMD say PC ports of next gen games are likely to struggle on Intel tech

Quit making sub-par CPUs that can be mistaken for space heaters. Then AMD can talk.

I am by no means wanting Intel to have a monopoly, but AMD is just lazy and tooting their horn of bullshit. AMD has always been 2nd rate to Intel.

Well..Intel has made huge progress with integrated GPUs, but they obviously still have ways to go. It's irrelevant though.On both laptops and desktops Intel + Nvidia combo will likely beat AMD parts.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

:lol:What a joke title, well played TC.

LordSadic

What, why? It's the official statement given by the Manager of Gaming Engineering at AMD.

I think this could only be an issue if a huge leap between both architectures is present.

People still game on IGPs?faizan_faizan

I've seen plenty of laptop owners (in campus) try to during lunchtime and breaks. Some games seem to run okay. Not my cup of tea though.

Hyperthreading.

topgunmv

Which is used by intel...

Nvidia Done.

Enjoy your $1000+ Titan card that has less GDDR5 than PS4.

EvanTheGamer

Bravo for not understanding why...

Nvidia Done.

Enjoy your $1000+ Titan card that has less GDDR5 than PS4.

EvanTheGamer

 :roll: Yeah, too bad that Titan with its 6Gb of GDDR5 doesn't perform any bit better than a 780 and its 3Gb of VRAM. You would think people on this forum would get by now that VRAM is not the be all end all that determines a GPU's capabilities. 

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]People still game on IGPs?jun_aka_pekto

I've seen plenty of laptop owners (in campus) try to during lunchtime and breaks. Some games seem to run okay. Not my cup of tea though.

Even PC hardware makers are only expecting console ports instead of exclusives. :lol:

#beg4consoleports

Even PC hardware makers are only expecting console ports instead of exclusives. :lol:

#beg4consoleports

Mr_BillGates

DRM begger, hello ?

Even PC hardware makers are only expecting console ports instead of exclusives. :lol:

#beg4consoleports

Mr_BillGates

#noexclusives4consoles

[QUOTE="EvanTheGamer"]

Nvidia Done.

Enjoy your $1000+ Titan card that has less GDDR5 than PS4.

cfisher2833

 :roll: Yeah, too bad that Titan with its 6Gb of GDDR5 doesn't perform any bit better than a 780 and its 3Gb of VRAM. You would think people on this forum would get by now that VRAM is not the be all end all that determines a GPU's capabilities. 

Cut them some slack they just found out about GDDR and VRAM :lol:

[QUOTE="EvanTheGamer"]

Nvidia Done.

Enjoy your $1000+ Titan card that has less GDDR5 than PS4.

cfisher2833

 :roll: Yeah, too bad that Titan with its 6Gb of GDDR5 doesn't perform any bit better than a 780 and its 3Gb of VRAM. You would think people on this forum would get by now that VRAM is not the be all end all that determines a GPU's capabilities. 

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

:lol:What a joke title, well played TC.

LordSadic

What, why? It's the official statement given by the Manager of Gaming Engineering at AMD.

I think this could only be an issue if a huge leap between both architectures is present.

Pc ports. "Ports" being a keyword. Fact of the matter is most games will be created around consoles.Heirren

Where do you read that ?

Well..Intel has made huge progress with integrated GPUs, but they obviously still have ways to go. It's irrelevant though.On both laptops and desktops Intel + Nvidia combo will likely beat AMD parts.

AdrianWerner

On both laptops and desktops, Intel + AMD combo is competitive to Intel + NVIDIA combo parts.

In the past, NVIDIA has offered X86 CPU http://www.nvidia.com/page/uli_m6117c.html NVIDIA is reduced to copy-and-paste CPU designs from ARM.

This won't affect performance of Intel CPUs when paired with a discrete GPU though will it?BPoole96

I guess this is only relevant to people who want to build an HTPC or small form factor rig, without the need for a dedicated graphics card. i.e. a console buster.

If they are really unoptimized yeah, wouldn't be surprised seeing i5/i7's getting bottlenecked because devs are lazy

This maybe good though, it may force Intel to step up their game & get some cheap 6-8 core CPU's out in the market instead of milking the quad core i series dry

If they are really unoptimized yeah, wouldn't be surprised seeing i5/i7's getting bottlenecked because devs are lazy This maybe good though, it may force Intel to step up their game & get some cheap 6-8 core CPU's out in the market instead of milking the quad core i series dry

HaloinventedFPS

If they are really unoptimized yeah, wouldn't be surprised seeing i5/i7's getting bottlenecked because devs are lazy

HaloinventedFPS

First game that came to mind is Skyrim...
Horrible CPU optimisation of the engine, so with so few cores being used, why not put the shadow on there to save some GPU power on those damn console...
When a 4 GHz I5/7 is falling below 60FPS because of one core at 100% while the other 3 are almost idle, you know the devs screwed up.

Well now next-gens have 8 cores, but shitty cores, so they can't do something similar anymore. 

lol at integrated gpu's.

They're a joke right now.

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

If they are really unoptimized yeah, wouldn't be surprised seeing i5/i7's getting bottlenecked because devs are lazy

Idontremember

First game that came to mind is Skyrim...
Horrible CPU optimisation of the engine, so with so few cores being used, why not put the shadow on there to save some GPU power on those damn console...
When a 4 GHz I5/7 is falling below 60FPS because of one core at 100% while the other 3 are almost idle, you know the devs screwed up.

Well now next-gens have 8 cores, but shitty cores, so they can't do something similar anymore. 

lol at integrated gpu's.

They're a joke right now.

XVision84

[QUOTE="Heirren"]Pc ports. "Ports" being a keyword. Fact of the matter is most games will be created around consoles.R4gn4r0k

Where do you read that ?

Its pretty muc the norm, has been for the last 10 years.

PC games don't sell, Console games do.

Turns out that the article is talking about integrated graphics.

I'm laughing right now. Who the hell plays games with that stuff?

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]Pc ports. "Ports" being a keyword. Fact of the matter is most games will be created around consoles.EvanTheGamer

Where do you read that ?

Its pretty muc the norm, has been for the last 10 years.

PC games don't sell, Console games do.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Hyperthreading.

Bebi_vegeta

Which is used by intel...

Which is why I mentioned it...

AMD? ahahahha!

So a low budget solution is going to struggle, where is the news?

Even if Intel sponsors the game?

I like how they target the iGP factor when really only super budget gamers would be bothered buy this

 

http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/06/07/amd-say-pc-ports-of-next-generation-console-titles-are-likely-to-struggle-on-intel-tech/?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=emp

NoodleFighter

I think you're taking this personally as if he's making a statement against PC gaming. He's specifically talking about the new Intel IGP that is designed for gaming.