Official 2013 NFL Offseason thread

List of the "best" QBs available from free agency.

Good Lord, that is a bad list.

Chutebox

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

List of the "best" QBs available from free agency.

Good Lord, that is a bad list.

monkeytoes61

I was sorely disappointed with how Campbell performed when we needed him this season.  It really seems to me that what matters more with backups is the team they're on.  Some teams, like Houston and Green Bay, just know how to keep backups primed for whatever reason.  Maybe they give them more reps in practice or have them work on one squad while the starter works on another (as opposed to "studying" the starter), but they can just bring people off the bench while other teams can't.  I know Martz never let the backup take reps and Tice basically picked up a lot of what he knows about running an offense from Martz, so maybe they just did a piss-poor job of keeping Campbell fresh and ready to step in.

Not to mention Campell started against the Texans and 49ers, as both teams just shat on the Bears O-line.

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Usually when you have too much of a good thing, you're lacking in other areas. Like running gamesherman-tank1

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] We have a running game. We just don't use it.The-Apostle

Jason Campbell was awful this year.. Like Trent Edwards bad.

Giants cut Ahmad Bradshaw. The move wasn't entirely unexpected but it's still shocking. He made have had plenty of injury issues but the guy was a warrior on the field, hope another team gives him a shot.

NightStalkerBX

Pssst, Packers...

Or it's because those teams are built well enough or have a system that the player can handle. Mike McCarthy isn't suddenly gonna become a sh1tty playcaller because Flynn is in, and it's not like that tea wasn't loaded. Plus the backups in Houston weren't playing well, but the defense/run game was good enough to keep winning in spite of them. In Jason Campbell's case he faced the same issue Cutler did in that the line is pretty mediocre, and really Brandon Marshall is the only top receiver on that team. The other guys are "good" with the right guy throwing them the ball.jg4xchamp

Quite true, but they paid Campbell good money for a backup specifically so that we at least had a chance of winning games with him behind center, watching his games I never thought we had a chance.  Funny thing is I think Marshall's numbers actually dropped when Campbell was playing, pretty sure Bennet's numbers went up.  I could be wrong, I just remember he seemed to be spreading the ball around more than Cutler.  No argument with the playcalling, though, Tice is worse than Garrett.

Not to mention Campell started against the Texans and 49ers, as both teams just shat on the Bears O-line.

sherman-tank1

Yeah, but I mean he really didn't do anything.  When Hanie played the Packers in the playoffs, for example, he put together some decent drives and made us feel like we had a chance of winning, Campbell had maybe one drive in each of those games.  THat's fine, but we paid Campbell more than Hanie and he was supposed to be an upgrade.

[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]

Giants cut Ahmad Bradshaw. The move wasn't entirely unexpected but it's still shocking. He made have had plenty of injury issues but the guy was a warrior on the field, hope another team gives him a shot.

CJL13

Pssst, Packers...

[QUOTE="CJL13"]

[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]

Giants cut Ahmad Bradshaw. The move wasn't entirely unexpected but it's still shocking. He made have had plenty of injury issues but the guy was a warrior on the field, hope another team gives him a shot.

The-Apostle

Pssst, Packers...

Starting Packers RB gets injured early? That's never happened before...

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="CJL13"]

Pssst, Packers...

CJL13

Starting Packers RB gets injured early? That's never happened before...

[QUOTE="CJL13"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] *Watches in horror as the Packers sign Bradshaw only for him to get a season-ending injury in week 1-3*The-Apostle

Starting Packers RB gets injured early? That's never happened before...

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="CJL13"]

Starting Packers RB gets injured early? That's never happened before...

jg4xchamp

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="The-Apostle"] That's happened to them the last 3-4 seasons. It's why the Packers running game always takes so long to develop.The-Apostle

1. Packers o-line is terrible

2. Packers RBs are mediocore at best

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] sarcasmsherman-tank1

1. Packers o-line is terrible

2. Packers RBs are mediocore at best

That is to say, I understand we can't pull out Adrian Peterson or Arian Foster-style games but we're decent.

And in other news, this is Bobbles.

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] sarcasmBobbles

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Right... It's not like Benson didn't get hurt this past season, or James Starks, or their starters the last couple years before them or anything... >_> Packers average two-three new starters per year and have for the last 3-4 years. And I guess the Packers didn't bring their current starting RB off the street? I believe he was selling used cars when the season started until a couple RBs went down with injury.

The-Apostle

1. Packers o-line is terrible

2. Packers RBs are mediocore at best

That is to say, I understand we can't pull out Adrian Peterson or Arian Foster-style games but we're decent.

Well, you can compete with the Lions for not the worst running game in the division.

Ray liota owns

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Right... It's not like Benson didn't get hurt this past season, or James Starks, or their starters the last couple years before them or anything... >_> Packers average two-three new starters per year and have for the last 3-4 years. And I guess the Packers didn't bring their current starting RB off the street? I believe he was selling used cars when the season started until a couple RBs went down with injury.

The-Apostle

1. Packers o-line is terrible

2. Packers RBs are mediocore at best

That is to say, I understand we can't pull out Adrian Peterson or Arian Foster-style games but we're decent.

We need to get better conditioners, no team has this many injuries this often unless something is wrong with how they train.

Ray liota owns

Chutebox

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Ray liota owns

36Ounces

Don't talk to chutef**k about good movies. He will bring up the expendables. 

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][ sarcasmThe-Apostle

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][ sarcasmjg4xchamp

lmaooo

[QUOTE="36Ounces"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Ray liota owns

Put_in_Kitna

Don't talk to chutef**k about good movies. He will bring up the expendables. 

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][ sarcasmjg4xchamp

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][ sarcasmjg4xchamp

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Right... It's not like Benson didn't get hurt this past season, or James Starks, or their starters the last couple years before them or anything... >_> Packers average two-three new starters per year and have for the last 3-4 years. And I guess the Packers didn't bring their current starting RB off the street? I believe he was selling used cars when the season started until a couple RBs went down with injury.

The-Apostle

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Right... It's not like Benson didn't get hurt this past season, or James Starks, or their starters the last couple years before them or anything... >_> Packers average two-three new starters per year and have for the last 3-4 years. And I guess the Packers didn't bring their current starting RB off the street? I believe he was selling used cars when the season started until a couple RBs went down with injury.

The-Apostle

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Right... It's not like Benson didn't get hurt this past season, or James Starks, or their starters the last couple years before them or anything... >_> Packers average two-three new starters per year and have for the last 3-4 years. And I guess the Packers didn't bring their current starting RB off the street? I believe he was selling used cars when the season started until a couple RBs went down with injury.

The-Apostle

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] No you stupid f*ck, I mean he was being saracastic. How the f*ck are you that dense.

sherman-tank1

Anquan Boldin set to retire if released:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8931984/anquan-boldin-says-retire-released-baltimore-ravens

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Probably because it's hard to read sarcasm on the Internet?The-Apostle

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Don't bother arguing with them. The more serious you take them to be, the more they will get a kick out of it.

sherman-tank1

Cary Williams will avoid discipline for pushing a ref in the Super Bowl.  What a ****ing waste Goodell and the rest of the goons in the NFL offices all are.

Cary Williams will avoid discipline for pushing a ref in the Super Bowl.  What a ****ing waste Goodell and the rest of the goons in the NFL offices all are.

Boston_Boyy

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Probably because it's hard to read sarcasm on the Internet?The-Apostle

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Don't bother arguing with them. The more serious you take them to be, the more they will get a kick out of it.

sherman-tank1

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Don't bother arguing with them. The more serious you take them to be, the more they will get a kick out of it.Bobbles

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] No you stupid f*ck, I mean he was being saracastic. How the f*ck are you that dense.

sherman-tank1

[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Pretty much... At least I don't take Bubbles seriously. Unless he actually IS a jackass IRL. Then I pity him. >_>Chutebox

[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="The-Apostle"] Pretty much... At least I don't take Bubbles seriously. Unless he actually IS a jackass IRL. Then I pity him. >_>Chutebox

Nah dude he is an as***** in the real. I don't wanna let him near my family. He is a hateful f*** and I love it!