You people need to agree on a damn definition then we can actually debate who deserves it
This topic is locked from further discussion.
MVP should be most valuable. It doesn't mean Most Valuable Player if it meant best player, otherwise it would be BP.
The argument against Peyton in here is a joke. The Broncos made the playoffs last year, cool.. with a f*ckin 8-8 record. Their offense was a joke and a half. How many 3 and outs did that sh*t average last year? Like 8? Peyton is coming off neck surgery that could've ended his career, oh but that's no big deal. Not only that he went to a new team where he has to build chemistry with different players and a different set of coaches. Oh and by the way he's got 10 wins again with all those things considered. That's not a big deal? GTFO! You wanna argue Brady and AP, that's fine and it is arguable. But to say Peyton shouldn't be in the conversation is just plain stupid and it begs the question, do you idiots watch football? F*cking wastes!BobblesI'm not sure if anybody is saying he don't deserve to be in the conversation, but I don't think he earns one of the top two spots.
I'm not sure if anybody is saying he don't deserve to be in the conversation, but I don't think he earns one of the top two spots. Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.[QUOTE="Bobbles"]The argument against Peyton in here is a joke. The Broncos made the playoffs last year, cool.. with a f*ckin 8-8 record. Their offense was a joke and a half. How many 3 and outs did that sh*t average last year? Like 8? Peyton is coming off neck surgery that could've ended his career, oh but that's no big deal. Not only that he went to a new team where he has to build chemistry with different players and a different set of coaches. Oh and by the way he's got 10 wins again with all those things considered. That's not a big deal? GTFO! You wanna argue Brady and AP, that's fine and it is arguable. But to say Peyton shouldn't be in the conversation is just plain stupid and it begs the question, do you idiots watch football? F*cking wastes!sherman-tank1
The argument against Peyton in here is a joke. The Broncos made the playoffs last year, cool.. with a f*ckin 8-8 record. Their offense was a joke and a half. How many 3 and outs did that sh*t average last year? Like 8? Peyton is coming off neck surgery that could've ended his career, oh but that's no big deal. Not only that he went to a new team where he has to build chemistry with different players and a different set of coaches. Oh and by the way he's got 10 wins again with all those things considered. That's not a big deal? GTFO! You wanna argue Brady and AP, that's fine and it is arguable. But to say Peyton shouldn't be in the conversation is just plain stupid and it begs the question, do you idiots watch football? F*cking wastes!Bobbles
Can't believe I actually agree with this mofo.
Too many to choose from for mvp. A **** load come to mind. Rg3, brady, peyton, luck, ap, von miller, jj, a. Smith, rodgers.....
Chutebox
:lol: GJ dude
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]I'm not sure if anybody is saying he don't deserve to be in the conversation, but I don't think he earns one of the top two spots. Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.[QUOTE="Bobbles"]The argument against Peyton in here is a joke. The Broncos made the playoffs last year, cool.. with a f*ckin 8-8 record. Their offense was a joke and a half. How many 3 and outs did that sh*t average last year? Like 8? Peyton is coming off neck surgery that could've ended his career, oh but that's no big deal. Not only that he went to a new team where he has to build chemistry with different players and a different set of coaches. Oh and by the way he's got 10 wins again with all those things considered. That's not a big deal? GTFO! You wanna argue Brady and AP, that's fine and it is arguable. But to say Peyton shouldn't be in the conversation is just plain stupid and it begs the question, do you idiots watch football? F*cking wastes!Bobbles
Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]I'm not sure if anybody is saying he don't deserve to be in the conversation, but I don't think he earns one of the top two spots.
sherman-tank1
So what is your point? Punish Manning because his division is crap? Guess what you leave AP in Minnesotta and they still won't win the division. Point again?
Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t. Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]I'm not sure if anybody is saying he don't deserve to be in the conversation, but I don't think he earns one of the top two spots.
sherman-tank1
Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"] Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Put_in_Kitna
So what is your point? Punish Manning because his division is crap? Guess what you leave AP in Minnesotta and they still won't win the division. Point again?
Yeah I am in a way using that against Manning. Not his fault but it is something you have to take account of when it comes to MVP. Anyways, the point is that the dropoff from with to without AP in the Vikings is greater than with to without Manning in the Broncos. MVP doesn't always have to come from a division winner.Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t. Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.The Patriots were much better in 2008 than they are now. The secondary sucks, the run game can not find success if the constant threat of a Hall of Fame QB isn't there, and the passing game is limited to short to medium passes because the Patriots lack the recieving core to stretch the field. Denver has a much better secondary, pass rush, and recieving core.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"] Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Bobbles
I disagree about Brady, them man has only thrown four INT's on the season. He doesn't make mistakes and slices and dices defenses like nobodies business. The Pats also didn't make the playoffs in that 11-5 year because they lost to division opponents the have consistenly beaten with Brady.
Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t. Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.The Broncos went 7-4 in games Tebow started though, and Cassel's proven he can be good outside of Belichick's system, seieng as his best season came in 2010 with Kansas City when he had a Quarterback rating over 90 and led the team to the playoffs, while Tebow can't even beat out Mark Sanchez for a starting job. Also, the team around Cassel (that was for the most part the same exact roster that had gone 18-1 the previous year) was also obviously superior to the team around Tim Tebow in Denver. And how are you going to say "Brady's a product of the system" when Belichick (like any coach) has had losing records when he didn't have a great talent, and with the fact that he's had success for over a decade with many different starting receivers, Tight Ends, and Offensive Lines of varying talent levels.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"] Yeah right, if you take him away and put Tebow back on the team the division isn't won and no one takes them serious in the playoffs. They are a SB contender with Manning and their defense is better with him. Their defense would be on the field for 40 minutes a game and wear down with Tebow. I expect dumb sh*t from you though, so it's not surprising. Your argument against him is the same stupid argument against Brady.Bobbles
Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.The Broncos went 7-4 in games Tebow started though, and Cassel's best season came in Kansas City in 2010 when he had a Quarterback rating over 90, while Tebow can't even beat out Mark Sanchez for a starting job. Also, the team around Cassel (that was for the most part the same exact team that had gone 18-1 the previous year) was also obviously superior to the team around Tim Tebow in Denver. And how are you going to say "Brady's a product of the system" when Belichick has had losing records when he didn't have a great QB, and he's had success over a decade with many different starting receivers, TEs, and offensive lines, etc of varying talent levels. You're a dumb ass, that is all.[QUOTE="Bobbles"]
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.
Boston_Boyy
[QUOTE="Put_in_Kitna"]
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.
sherman-tank1
So what is your point? Punish Manning because his division is crap? Guess what you leave AP in Minnesotta and they still won't win the division. Point again?
Yeah I am in a way using that against Manning. Not his fault but it is something you have to take account of when it comes to MVP. Anyways, the point is that the dropoff from with to without AP in the Vikings is greater than with to without Manning in the Broncos. MVP doesn't always have to come from a division winner.Says who dude? What are you basing this off? Opinion? Because AP has been with the Vikings for 6 years and they made the playoffs once. Guess who was their qb tht year? Yeah Favre who had an MVP caliber season. Seems to me like the Vikings don't improve much record wise with or without AP. They don't make the playoffs with him or without him so what does it matter. How valuable is he you say? You mean they can go from a 6-8 win team to a winless team? Doubt it.
[QUOTE="Boston_Boyy"]The Broncos went 7-4 in games Tebow started though, and Cassel's best season came in Kansas City in 2010 when he had a Quarterback rating over 90, while Tebow can't even beat out Mark Sanchez for a starting job. Also, the team around Cassel (that was for the most part the same exact team that had gone 18-1 the previous year) was also obviously superior to the team around Tim Tebow in Denver. And how are you going to say "Brady's a product of the system" when Belichick has had losing records when he didn't have a great QB, and he's had success over a decade with many different starting receivers, TEs, and offensive lines, etc of varying talent levels. You're a dumb ass, that is all.I just take that as meaning you have no counter-arguments to anything I just said, and unless you can actually provide something of substance that's what i'll continue to assume.[QUOTE="Bobbles"] Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.
Bobbles
That's a bad argument though, the fact that a team may have a good backup should be irrelevant as no MVP candidate actually controls that. It'd be like saying Rodgers didn't deserve the MVP last year because we think Flynn is a pretty good backup, or that Joe Montana should have never been considered in the years he had Steve Young as a backup.The Vikes have Toby Gerhart that have shown some stuff, but playing behind AP he gets almost no play time. They would still have a decent run game without AP in my opinion.
Yusuke420
Man this sh*t's so subjective. Ya'll can argue all day bout the pro's and con's, and some have good arguments. Mostly comes down to opinions.
I said Manning bc he came off those surgeries, and he better than ever. Elway knew without Manning the Broncs weren't going to the playoffs this year. Now they're a Super Bowl front runner with him.
Oh yeah? They went 11-5 with Matt Cassel BETTER than 8-8 Denver with Tim Tebow, Brady is a product of the system. You POS, this argument stinks and you know it.The Patriots were much better in 2008 than they are now. The secondary sucks, the run game can not find success if the constant threat of a Hall of Fame QB isn't there, and the passing game is limited to short to medium passes because the Patriots lack the recieving core to stretch the field. Denver has a much better secondary, pass rush, and recieving core. WR corps is debatable when you include TEs. Brady has the better rushing attack, not even close. Also, like I already pointed out... the defense has gotten better partially because of Peyton. It ranked 24th in points last year and 20th in yards. It now ranks 4th in both categories. Why? Von Miller getting better and the defense isn't on the field for 40 f*ckin minutes a game.[QUOTE="Bobbles"]
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Ok, but you take AP out of Minnesota and they would probably be winless right now. Take Brady out of New England and they would be worse than the Dolphins. I believe the Broncos would still be playoff contenders with Tebow because ther division is so shi!t.
sherman-tank1
[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]Going based off 'most valuable' makes this basically a QB only award. BobblesPretty much. Any one who would take the top RB in the league over the top QBs in today's league is just dumb. With luck you can get both rolled into one (See RGIII and Cam Newton).
Yeah I am in a way using that against Manning. Not his fault but it is something you have to take account of when it comes to MVP. Anyways, the point is that the dropoff from with to without AP in the Vikings is greater than with to without Manning in the Broncos. MVP doesn't always have to come from a division winner.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Put_in_Kitna"]
So what is your point? Punish Manning because his division is crap? Guess what you leave AP in Minnesotta and they still won't win the division. Point again?
Put_in_Kitna
Says who dude? What are you basing this off? Opinion? Because AP has been with the Vikings for 6 years and they made the playoffs once. Guess who was their qb tht year? Yeah Favre who had an MVP caliber season. Seems to me like the Vikings don't improve much record wise with or without AP. They don't make the playoffs with him or without him so what does it matter. How valuable is he you say? You mean they can go from a 6-8 win team to a winless team? Doubt it.
You do have a very good point, but I do believe that the Vikings would be winless. They would be worse off than the Chiefs and Jaguars. At least the QBs there can put up more yards than their RB. And the Vikings are mediocore on defense, I believe the only thing that keeps them from being worse is the fact that AP can consistently keep the defense off the field. Honestly, all three are great candidates and I suppose we should just wait until the end of the season. Things may be a little more clear by then. Maybe AP starts to struggle, maybe Brady or Manning have a rought stretch, who knows.Pretty much. Any one who would take the top RB in the league over the top QBs in today's league is just dumb. With luck you can get both rolled into one (See RGIII and Cam Newton).Except Newton isn't close to a top QB.[QUOTE="Bobbles"][QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]Going based off 'most valuable' makes this basically a QB only award. Yusuke420
With luck you can get both rolled into one (See RGIII and Cam Newton).Except Newton isn't close to a top QB. He has the talent, if they land Marquis Lee in the Draft I bet we see Andy Dalton/AJ Green style production from Carolina. Cam is much better then this season would indicate.[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
[QUOTE="Bobbles"] Pretty much. Any one who would take the top RB in the league over the top QBs in today's league is just dumb.sherman-tank1
Except Newton isn't close to a top QB. He has the talent, if they land Marquis Lee in the Draft I bet we see Andy Dalton/AJ Green style production from Carolina. Cam is much better then this season would indicate. He already has a top WR in his offense. I hope Lee doesn't enter the draft and if he does, doesn't end up wasting there. Cam is actually having the same type of year he had last year. He's pretty consistent at being who he is: not a top QB.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Yusuke420"] With luck you can get both rolled into one (See RGIII and Cam Newton).
Yusuke420
Who? Steve Smith? He's years past his prime and nobody is stepping up on a consistant basis. Sophmore slump happens to even the best, so expect Cam to have an even better season next year, Lee would make me very happy as I'm a huge USC fan and to have him on my favorite NFL team is a great dream. He's on pace for 5,000 total yards this season, but passing TD's are down this year which is a reflection of the WR/TE core and some questionable things Cam has done in the endzone. If you're going to take a young QB to start your team, Cam is easily in the Top 5.
Give Cam a breakout wide out like Lee and someone to step up in the running game consistantly and you'll see Cam's TD number go up. His a passing yards are already on elite levels (back to back 4,000 yard seasons is nothing to sneeze at), but he is the only playmaker on that team.How is it a softmore slump when he's having the same type of year? He hasn't shown me anything that says he'll be a top QB.
And come on, Steve Smith is awesome.
Chutebox
Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB.Give Cam a breakout wide out like Lee and someone to step up in the running game consistantly and you'll see Cam's TD number go up. His a passing yards are already on elite levels (back to back 4,000 yard seasons is nothing to sneeze at), but he is the only playmaker on that team.
Yusuke420
Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB. Pretty much. Yards will mean something when turnovers are down. And to Cam's credit, he has thrown less INTs this year, but his fumbles are up.[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
Give Cam a breakout wide out like Lee and someone to step up in the running game consistantly and you'll see Cam's TD number go up. His a passing yards are already on elite levels (back to back 4,000 yard seasons is nothing to sneeze at), but he is the only playmaker on that team.
sherman-tank1
BTW, Smith has 1k yards receiving again this year. Don't tell me he's not awesome!
Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB. Stafford has the opprotunity to be that, winning is a team thing. QB's get all the spot light but no one is going to say they wouldn't want Cam or MAtt on their teams unless they have a super QB like Brady or Manning. Are you going to say Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco are vastly superior to these two just because their teams happen to be winning? Carolina has blown 6 fourth quarter leads this season. That's not on Cam, it's no that swiss cheese defense that plays not to lose instead of to win in the fourth and ends up getting beat.[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
Give Cam a breakout wide out like Lee and someone to step up in the running game consistantly and you'll see Cam's TD number go up. His a passing yards are already on elite levels (back to back 4,000 yard seasons is nothing to sneeze at), but he is the only playmaker on that team.
sherman-tank1
Name ten and if Romo is on your list I will laugh at you lol...[QUOTE="Chutebox"]
Your swiss cheese defense just held Atlanta down and I'd take a number of QBs before Cam.
Yusuke420
Laughing at you right now.
We are getting epically side tracked, but Carolina is my team, so of course I'm going to defend our franchise QB. Back to the MVP debate, is there an outlier out there you think should get some consideration? I have heard JJ Watt and Von Miller in the outlier names mentioned. Yusuke420It's fine to defend him. He's your qb. I hate the cowboys with all my heart, but I would take him over Cam.\ Anywho, we are off track so I'll stop before a mod comes in here out of nowhere again (pretty sure I know someone who complained).
We are getting epically side tracked, but Carolina is my team, so of course I'm going to defend our franchise QB. Back to the MVP debate, is there an outlier out there you think should get some consideration? I have heard JJ Watt and Von Miller in the outlier names mentioned. Yusuke420It should be on pure play, screw who people think are more valuable.
Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB. Stafford has the opprotunity to be that, winning is a team thing. QB's get all the spot light but no one is going to say they wouldn't want Cam or MAtt on their teams unless they have a super QB like Brady or Manning. Are you going to say Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco are vastly superior to these two just because their teams happen to be winning? Carolina has blown 6 fourth quarter leads this season. That's not on Cam, it's no that swiss cheese defense that plays not to lose instead of to win in the fourth and ends up getting beat.Matt Ryan and Flacco aren't elite though. Brees is stil elite for an example, even though his team is 5-7. Rodgers is still elite, as is Big Ben. Let me name 10 QBs I would take before Cam. Brady, Eli, Peyton, Ryan, Big Ben, RG3, Dalton, Brees, Stafford, and Cutler.[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]
[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
Give Cam a breakout wide out like Lee and someone to step up in the running game consistantly and you'll see Cam's TD number go up. His a passing yards are already on elite levels (back to back 4,000 yard seasons is nothing to sneeze at), but he is the only playmaker on that team.
Yusuke420
Stafford has the opprotunity to be that, winning is a team thing. QB's get all the spot light but no one is going to say they wouldn't want Cam or MAtt on their teams unless they have a super QB like Brady or Manning. Are you going to say Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco are vastly superior to these two just because their teams happen to be winning? Carolina has blown 6 fourth quarter leads this season. That's not on Cam, it's no that swiss cheese defense that plays not to lose instead of to win in the fourth and ends up getting beat.Matt Ryan and Flacco aren't elite though. Brees is stil elite for an example, even though his team is 5-7. Rodgers is still elite, as is Big Ben. Let me name 10 QBs I would take before Cam. Brady, Eli, Peyton, Ryan, Big Ben, RG3, Dalton, Brees, Stafford, and Cutler. Nah. Cousins won that game against Ravens, clearly RG3 aint that good.[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB.
sherman-tank1
Stafford has the opprotunity to be that, winning is a team thing. QB's get all the spot light but no one is going to say they wouldn't want Cam or MAtt on their teams unless they have a super QB like Brady or Manning. Are you going to say Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco are vastly superior to these two just because their teams happen to be winning? Carolina has blown 6 fourth quarter leads this season. That's not on Cam, it's no that swiss cheese defense that plays not to lose instead of to win in the fourth and ends up getting beat.Matt Ryan and Flacco aren't elite though. Brees is stil elite for an example, even though his team is 5-7. Rodgers is still elite, as is Big Ben. Let me name 10 QBs I would take before Cam. Brady, Eli, Peyton, Ryan, Big Ben, RG3, Dalton, Brees, Stafford, and Cutler. Ryan, Dalton(who lose RoY to Cam), Jay Cutler(have you seen the bears play recently?), and Stafford before Cam? What is you basis for these guys. Everyone else has either won a title or is RGIII, those other guys aren't better then Cam though.[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]Yards don't mean squat. That would mean Stafford is an elite QB.
sherman-tank1
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment