Kavanaugh Confirmed to be the next supreme court Justice by 50 - 48 - Democrats now begin impeachment

Are the Democrats who stayed home because their preferred candidate didn't win the nomination ready to talk about the pitfalls of that strategy?

What is a prank?

But it would be kinda funny to see Collins or Flake vote no to Kavanaugh at the last min to see the conservatives blow up and watch Trump on Twitter.

I hear ya, Zar! I really hope the SC doesn't go far right when Ginsberg has to leave or she passes away. But it will...

That would be terrible for the country. Things that a most people disagree with passing at every turn.

No, I'm talking about the Cheeto Chimpanzee's being elected as the President of the US and the entire shit show that followed.

Hmm, ok

So let´s be civil about this, are you worse of today than you were before Trump was elected?

Yeah, the NAFTA agreement has been destroying my country's economy. During Obama's term, our dollar was recovering steadily and holding fairly decently close to par. Now the man-child is acting like a three year old and trying to "punish" us for not agreeing to his terms without getting anything for us.

Our steel, resource production and farm/dairy industries are suffering because a piece of shit human being runs your country.

1. I thought republicans were pro-freedom of speech.

2. Republicans are just as worse as democrats.

Yeah, but Trump doesn't care.

"Oh but you Canucks have no right to talk about America because.... uh... #Maga/Kag!"

Sorry Fox, couldn't resist! Because that mentality pisses me off! By Trumpservatives logic, we shouldn't talk politics of other countries of the world. I shouldn't be studying British/Irish politics and comparing them to our own (predicting a possible IRA/FLQ-esque terror unit to rise in the US) by their logic.

Schumer just spoke, McConnell is speaking now. I suppose after his speech the Senate will vote.

I guess it's just the Trumpette's not being able to handle criticism of their lord and saviour, being such sensitive snowflakes.

Schumer was an absolute disgrace, he pretty much confirmed what the Republicans have been saying "We the Democrats do not like Kavanaugh because he does not share our views on what is morally right" Nothing about the supreme court should be kept impartial and be about what the law states.

That senator clearly needs to be taught a lesson in the separation of power and that the judicial branch should be kept free from political bias and shit shows.

And here we go.

Gallery goes wild when Manchin votes aye.

LOL yea this is insane

At least the sergeant at arms finally have something to do other than the normal boring Senator speech

And your country is tariffs on our dairy products have been destroying our farmers for years, but I take it you are not happy with the new deal then?

And there it is.

Those tariffs were strategically imposed to make all those people regret voting for Trump and show him what a piece of shit he was being. And from my experience dealing with Wisconsin dairy farmers, I can tell you they do, and they hold nothing against Trudeau, amazingly.

So you tried to destroy our country because you didn´t like who democracy voted into office? well, that is sure nice of you canucks.

But fair is fair right, so our tariffs is all fair then right, it wouldn´t happen to be an issue where you have some double standards?

A new low for the republican party. Completely morally bankrupt. A huge loss for America as a whole.

I don't know why @ needhealing was flagged. I am for freedom of speech always have been even when it is disgusting hate speech. That is the speech that is protected by the First Amendment.

In a job interview, you don't destroy a person's character with allegations that can't be proven.

Yep.

You mind not lying and try to put words into my posts or are you really that desperate ?

Just confirmed on CBS.

Coming from you, Jacan. That's rich.

And on C-span and CNN and MSNBC and everywhere else.

But must admit CNN surprised me with this latest man they brought in, saying it like it is.

Trump imposed tariffs first numbnuts. Trudeau's were retaliatory.

And I find it funny you call the American voting system "democracy". He didn't have the popular vote, which by definition, would have been the truly democratic choice.

Fairly selfish of you to think that the President of the United States should care about your steel, resource production, and farm / dairy industries at the expense of this own constituents. Especially since it is quite apparent you aren't giving the same consideration.

@Jacanuk: I'm watching Gators/LSU game. It was breaking news apparently.

So more lies I see.

But I have no problem with Fox expressing their opinion about Trump. Fox unlike you is usually civil and can have a discourse without going to the extremes.

Ahh go sports team :D hope your side wins.

Funnily enough, a large portion of the American steel manufacturing industry relies on Canadian steel. If it weren't for our large recycling industry, you'd have to order more from China and get more subpar products. But hey, maybe that's what Trump wants, he's probably got a finger in the Chinese steel pie.

Which again, you too have done to anyone on the left or anyone who dares speaks ill of Trump, Mr. "McCain was a Democrat in disguise".

Considering the passing of Mccain, I won´t engage you on that side, out of respect which you seem to not be able to do.

Wasn't that Trumps platform?

Edit: Yeah, it was. I had to check. He blamed Mexicans, Asians, Blacks, 'The Guberment', NATO, UN, Clinton herself, just about everybody except Russia and Israel. The American People are 'victims' of a world taking advantage of them.

"Nothing you can do folks, we'll 2nd ammendment so maybe," Donald Trump.

Hmm, I would watch those threats, Serra.

Maybe Horgen can give gamespots 5 cents on what is clearly a lethal threat against a sitting US supreme court justice.

Good. This whole thing has been an embarrassing sham.

Just quoting the man we call our president. It's all right there for you to see. If you don't care for that sort of rhetoric maybe don't support people who say such things, I know I don't support it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html

Well, this is not Donald Trump's forum and I think most agree that violence is not the answer.

So are you really suggesting that someone should go "take care" of Kavanaugh?

@Jacanuk: "Well, this is not Donald Trump's forum and I think most agree that violence is not the answer."

If only your president agreed with you.

They'll have their own Salem witch trial at DC.

He has to be guilty. BELIEVE WOMEN!

Death threats go way beyond what I deal with. Though do we look at this as someone merely quoting Trump, or have any more meaning behind it...? I am not the one who will judge that.

Well, Serra is usually reasonable but the quote was clearly meant as I suspect most think Trump meant it, that someone actually takes care of Kavanaugh the only way that will remove him.

But I have no idea how you guys deal with this. Just thought it was a line crossed. You can disagree politically but violence is never ok.

I am sure he does. but who knows it´s trump after all.

Still, I think your comment crossed the line there.

I thought we'd established long ago that invoking the second amendment in that matter was acceptable political speech.

Nothing like pouting, screaming and banging your fists when your side loses.........

I always thought it was cool when he announces the President entering the chamber before the SOTU.

Most reasonable people knew that what Trump said was referring to pro-2nd Amendment people voting against Hillary Clinton so she couldn’t nominate justices that would weaken the Second Amendment. The fact that people still to this day claim that his statement was meant to rally people to assassinate Clinton if she won or liberal justices is laughable at best.