There is no evidence that shows Christian beliefs are false

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

gameking5000

I am from the planet jupiter, my species is quite lucky, life only exists on a small number of gas giants. I am 27,000 years old and I navigate though the gas layers using a complex bladder floatation system. I am also host to a varied parasitic ecosystem.

But it can get boring just floating about so I post here for the lols.

Christianity is almost identicle to an old Egyptian religion but i can't for the life of me remember what the religion was called. Can someone help me out here?

Christianity is almost identicle to an old Egyptian religion but i can't for the life of me remember what the religion was called. Can someone help me out here?

The_Gaming_Baby

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

gameking5000

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

gameking5000

Christianity is almost identicle to an old Egyptian religion but i can't for the life of me remember what the religion was called. Can someone help me out here?

The_Gaming_Baby

cool story bropygmahia5

[QUOTE="gameking5000"]

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

tenaka2

I am from the planet jupiter, my species is quite lucky, life only exists on a small number of gas giants. I am 27,000 years old and I navigate though the gas layers using a complex bladder floatation system. I am also host to a varied parasitic ecosystem.

But it can get boring just floating about so I post here for the lols.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="gameking5000"]

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

LJS9502_basic

I am from the planet jupiter, my species is quite lucky, life only exists on a small number of gas giants. I am 27,000 years old and I navigate though the gas layers using a complex bladder floatation system. I am also host to a varied parasitic ecosystem.

But it can get boring just floating about so I post here for the lols.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="gameking5000"]

People often say "Oh, there's no evidence that Jesus lived" and that God doesn't exist etc. But there isn't any that disproves Jesus and God exists.

LJS9502_basic

I am from the planet jupiter, my species is quite lucky, life only exists on a small number of gas giants. I am 27,000 years old and I navigate though the gas layers using a complex bladder floatation system. I am also host to a varied parasitic ecosystem.

But it can get boring just floating about so I post here for the lols.

Their both fruit though, so you have to give him some merit. (oranges taste better, imo)

There's no evidence that shows my imaginary best friend doesn't exist so come at me bro

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

I am from the planet jupiter, my species is quite lucky, life only exists on a small number of gas giants. I am 27,000 years old and I navigate though the gas layers using a complex bladder floatation system. I am also host to a varied parasitic ecosystem.

But it can get boring just floating about so I post here for the lols.

lloveLamp

An inability to invalidate a hypothesis is not the same as proving it to be true.

Metaphysical claims have always fallen outside the realm of falsifiability, and therefore their worth can never be thought of as tangible.

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You are comparing apples and oranges......

LJS9502_basic

I imagine your opinion would be rather unique, there is at least some evidence supporting life on other planets.

Christianity is almost identicle to an old Egyptian religion but i can't for the life of me remember what the religion was called. Can someone help me out here?

The_Gaming_Baby

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="lloveLamp"] i agree. life on other planets is very likely. but the jesus thing is very unlikelytenaka2

I imagine your opinion would be rather unique, there is at least some evidence supporting life on other planets.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]At this point in time I'd say equal. Not one more than the other.LJS9502_basic

I imagine your opinion would be rather unique, there is at least some evidence supporting life on other planets.

Live came into being on this planet, we know there are billions and billions of other planets.

There is nothing to support religion.

No with the physical natural world that doesn't happen. However, it isn't said to have happened in the natural world. Not a good analogy.LJS9502_basic

The way you worded that amused me... it makes it sound as if Mary was not on earth when she was impregnated.

The argument of Christ and God's existence will forever be in a loop. You can't prove He doesn't exist vs You can't prove he does exist.

This is a trivial argument that should be ignored, why, because you're not going to get anywhere with it. Give it a rest. I believe in God and I know He's real. I'm not going to argue that He is because I already know that He is. I would suggest the same for you TC.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No with the physical natural world that doesn't happen. However, it isn't said to have happened in the natural world. Not a good analogy.Baconbits2004

The way you worded that amused me... it makes it sound as if Mary was not on earth when she was impregnated.

She wasn't, she was in the mother ship.

There is no evidence that shows Baha'i beliefs are falseultimameteora

Considering baha was dreamed up only a few years ago is there even a need to disprove it?

mother ship.

tenaka2

ROFL.

That works in so many ways.

why do people feel so compelled to either prove or disprove a theory based on faith, if either is achieved the theory is destroyed as it no longer requires faith...

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

mother ship.

Baconbits2004

ROFL.

That works in so many ways.

that is because it is very adaptable and it is impossible to disprove a fantasy story which was from the times before any sort of records were kept...

but there is no evidence to prove it at all, whereas scientific theories have lots of things to back them up.

that is because it is very adaptable and it is impossible to disprove a fantasy story which was from the times before any sort of records were kept...

but there is no evidence to prove it at all, whereas scientific theories have lots of things to back them up.

PcGamingRig

[QUOTE="PcGamingRig"]

that is because it is very adaptable and it is impossible to disprove a fantasy story which was from the times before any sort of records were kept...

but there is no evidence to prove it at all, whereas scientific theories have lots of things to back them up.

surrealnumber5

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="PcGamingRig"]

that is because it is very adaptable and it is impossible to disprove a fantasy story which was from the times before any sort of records were kept...

but there is no evidence to prove it at all, whereas scientific theories have lots of things to back them up.

PcGamingRig

Live came into being on this planet, we know there are billions and billions of other planets.There is nothing to support religion.tenaka2

The way you worded that amused me... it makes it sound as if Mary was not on earth when she was impregnated.Baconbits2004

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="PcGamingRig"]

that is because it is very adaptable and it is impossible to disprove a fantasy story which was from the times before any sort of records were kept...

but there is no evidence to prove it at all, whereas scientific theories have lots of things to back them up.

PcGamingRig

He was mentioned by some historians....and in the NT. While one may debate the "faith" part of the Bible they should not debate the historical part.

LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="PcGamingRig"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] before any sort of records were kept..... i wonder how we know about Alexander the great, he predated Christ, that is just the first thing to come to mind, any historical BC event or person would do.

LJS9502_basic

Yes they should, If the Bible is believed to be factually wrong on so many accounts as to bring into question its legitimacy then what makes you think the Historical accounts held within are any more reliable?

She wasn't the one I was saying wasn't natural.;)

LJS9502_basic

I figured. =p

Just because you cannot disprove something that has no proof of existing in the first place, doesn't mean that proves its existence.

Just because you cannot disprove something that has no proof of existing in the first place, doesn't mean that proves its existence.

Wasdie

Reminds me of the ol' space pie theory.

At least I think that's what it was.
You can't disprove that there isn't a slice of pie floating in space, just because you can't find it. Therefore it could exist.

The argument of Christ and God's existence will forever be in a loop. You can't prove He doesn't exist vs You can't prove he does exist.

This is a trivial argument that should be ignored, why, because you're not going to get anywhere with it. Give it a rest. I believe in God and I know He's real. I'm not going to argue that He is because I already know that He is. I would suggest the same for you TC.

lowkey254

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Just because you cannot disprove something that has no proof of existing in the first place, doesn't mean that proves its existence.

Baconbits2004

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="PcGamingRig"]hmmm, yea but... there was proof in items and records that alexander the great existed. if jesus was such an amazing person and did all the things that are claimed, you would think there would atleast be a trace of him...

mattisgod01

Yes they should, If the Bible is believed to be factually wrong on so many accounts as to bring into question its legitimacy then what makes you think the Historical accounts held within are any more reliable?

The Common argument is known as Russell's Teapot.

"Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time."

mattisgod01

That's the one. :3

Thank you for finding that.