Chicago: The Deadliest Global City.

  • 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

Among what are considered Alpha world cities, Chicago has the highest murder rate -- higher even than the Third World metropolises of Mexico City and Sao Paolo.

Singapore 0.4
Tokyo 0.5
Hong Kong 0.6
Berlin 1.0
Sydney 1.0
London 1.4
Toronto 1.7
Amsterdam 1.8
Paris 4.4
New York 6.0
Los Angeles 7.5
Mexico City 8.0
Moscow 9.6
Sao Paulo 15.6
Chicago 19.4


Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/The-Deadliest-Global-City-163874546.html#ixzz2JDqxRM4j

Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

1001-emanuel-rahm-obama-embrace_full_600

.

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts
idgi
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

idgiRich3232

What do you not get?

Avatar image for one_plum
one_plum

6822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 one_plum
Member since 2009 • 6822 Posts

Wow Asia.

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"]idgikingkong0124

What do you not get?

who is that other dude, and what is the picture supposed to be conveying?
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"]idgiRich3232

What do you not get?

who is that other dude, and what is the picture supposed to be conveying?

Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago.

Avatar image for Toph_Girl250
Toph_Girl250

48978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Toph_Girl250
Member since 2008 • 48978 Posts
I can understand why, isn't Chicago a big mafia hang-out?
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

What do you not get?

kingkong0124

who is that other dude, and what is the picture supposed to be conveying?

Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago.

What is your point though I think he was asking?
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

I can understand why, isn't Chicago a big mafia hang-out?Toph_Girl250

I thought it was mostly teen gangs

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

What do you not get?

kingkong0124

who is that other dude, and what is the picture supposed to be conveying?

Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago.

okay. can you answer the second part now?
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

But, but... Chicago's a gun free zone.

Surely the crime must be low.

Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

Sure.

500 Murders In Chicago Show Gun Bans Don't Work

Guns: The mayor of what is at once America's most gun-controlled city and its murder capital wants an assault weapons ban like the one he pushed in 1994. Except it didn't work then, and it won't work now.

Nathaniel T. Jackson, 40, an alleged gang member with a long arrest record, was gunned down last week outside a store in Chicago's Austin neighborhood, becoming the Windy City's 500th murder victim in 2012.

Up to 80% of Chicago's murders and shootings are gang-related, according to police. By one estimate, the city has almost 70,000 gang members. A police audit last spring identified 59 gangs and 625 factions; most were on the South and West sides.

Yet, in the view of Chicago's mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, the answer to violence by crazies and criminals in his city and nationally is more gun control, not more gang and goon control.

"As somebody who stood by President Clinton's side to make sure we had a ban on assault weapons, I do not want to see more weapons on the street, more guns on the street," Emanuel said at a Chicago Police Department graduation and promotion ceremony on Dec. 17, shortly after the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

"It's time that we as a city have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a state have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a country have an assault weapons ban," Emanuel said.

The problem is that Emanuel's ban, in place from 1994 to 2004, had no measurable effect on crime.

Statistics compiled by a Northeastern University professor, the Census Bureau and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel show the number of mass shootings and victims from 1976 to 2010 has fluctuated annually, but without any major upward or downward trend.

Some 2,956 people have been killed in 646 mass shootings over this 35-year period, with a mass shooting defined by the FBI as one in which four or more people (not including the shooter) are killed in a single incident and typically in a single location. FBI homicide data show no discernible trend in the number of mass shootings or victims during that time.

A chart using these data and published in the Journal Sentinel does show that while the Clinton/Emanuel assault weapons ban was in place, from 1994 to 2004, mass shootings actually rose slightly and that after its repeal there was no precipitous rise, as supporters had warned.

From 1985-94, there were 173 mass shootings and 766 victims. From 1995-04 (starting with 1995 because it was the first full year the law was in effect), there were 182 mass shootings and 830 victims. Clearly the assault weapons ban, which listed banned arms more on their scary appearance than any deadly potential, had no effect.

"You had that for 10 years when Dianne Feinstein passed that ban in '94. It was on the books. Columbine occurred right in the middle of it (April 20, 1999). It didn't make any difference," NRA chief Wayne LaPierre argued in a recent appearance on NBC's "Meet The Press," where host David Gregory may have violated the law himself by possessing and waving before the cameras a high-capacity ammunition clip.

What has had an effect on crime, and even mass shootings, is the rise in the number of concealed carry states from only a handful 25 years ago to some 41 now. Major crimes, except in gun-controlled major cities, have shown a continuing decline that has paralleled the rise in the number of right-to-carry states.

Maybe Mayor Emanuel, instead of calling for a new assault weapons ban, should call on Illinois to become a concealed carry state.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Ok.

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts

Sure.

500 Murders In Chicago Show Gun Bans Don't Work

Guns: The mayor of what is at once America's most gun-controlled city and its murder capital wants an assault weapons ban like the one he pushed in 1994. Except it didn't work then, and it won't work now.

Nathaniel T. Jackson, 40, an alleged gang member with a long arrest record, was gunned down last week outside a store in Chicago's Austin neighborhood, becoming the Windy City's 500th murder victim in 2012.

Up to 80% of Chicago's murders and shootings are gang-related, according to police. By one estimate, the city has almost 70,000 gang members. A police audit last spring identified 59 gangs and 625 factions; most were on the South and West sides.

Yet, in the view of Chicago's mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, the answer to violence by crazies and criminals in his city and nationally is more gun control, not more gang and goon control.

"As somebody who stood by President Clinton's side to make sure we had a ban on assault weapons, I do not want to see more weapons on the street, more guns on the street," Emanuel said at a Chicago Police Department graduation and promotion ceremony on Dec. 17, shortly after the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

"It's time that we as a city have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a state have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a country have an assault weapons ban," Emanuel said.

The problem is that Emanuel's ban, in place from 1994 to 2004, had no measurable effect on crime.

Statistics compiled by a Northeastern University professor, the Census Bureau and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel show the number of mass shootings and victims from 1976 to 2010 has fluctuated annually, but without any major upward or downward trend.

Some 2,956 people have been killed in 646 mass shootings over this 35-year period, with a mass shooting defined by the FBI as one in which four or more people (not including the shooter) are killed in a single incident and typically in a single location. FBI homicide data show no discernible trend in the number of mass shootings or victims during that time.

A chart using these data and published in the Journal Sentinel does show that while the Clinton/Emanuel assault weapons ban was in place, from 1994 to 2004, mass shootings actually rose slightly and that after its repeal there was no precipitous rise, as supporters had warned.

From 1985-94, there were 173 mass shootings and 766 victims. From 1995-04 (starting with 1995 because it was the first full year the law was in effect), there were 182 mass shootings and 830 victims. Clearly the assault weapons ban, which listed banned arms more on their scary appearance than any deadly potential, had no effect.

"You had that for 10 years when Dianne Feinstein passed that ban in '94. It was on the books. Columbine occurred right in the middle of it (April 20, 1999). It didn't make any difference," NRA chief Wayne LaPierre argued in a recent appearance on NBC's "Meet The Press," where host David Gregory may have violated the law himself by possessing and waving before the cameras a high-capacity ammunition clip.

What has had an effect on crime, and even mass shootings, is the rise in the number of concealed carry states from only a handful 25 years ago to some 41 now. Major crimes, except in gun-controlled major cities, have shown a continuing decline that has paralleled the rise in the number of right-to-carry states.

Maybe Mayor Emanuel, instead of calling for a new assault weapons ban, should call on Illinois to become a concealed carry state.

kingkong0124

Oh, is that it? Dumb.
Avatar image for osirisx3
osirisx3

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 osirisx3
Member since 2012 • 2113 Posts

banning guns = communism

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Chicago has always had a bad crime rate in parts. It's mostly gang on gang violence which is sad. Hopefully, they'd get a mayor in their at some part that could help to start cleaning up the city. But I doubt it. A lot of big cities in the US suffer from extraordinarily poor leadership. Detroit, DC, Chicago, LA, etc.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

So 505 murders last year in a city of 2.7 million. The town in southern Illinois where my parents live has a population of like 6,500 and had 3 murders last year. I wonder what that murder rate would be.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

And I thought this was going to be a gun control thread...

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Damn man what the hell is going on in Caracas.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Gotta love that gun control. It's really working wonders.

Avatar image for TheFallenDemon
TheFallenDemon

13933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TheFallenDemon
Member since 2010 • 13933 Posts

well there go all my plans of eating some geniune chicago deep dish

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I can understand why, isn't Chicago a big mafia hang-out?Toph_Girl250

about 90 years ago it was

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

Gotta love that gun control. It's really working wonders.

hartsickdiscipl
But the murder rate in Chicago was extremely high even before the gun control was implemented.
Avatar image for NEWMAHAY
NEWMAHAY

3824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 NEWMAHAY
Member since 2012 • 3824 Posts
Chicago gun control plan is pointless when you can get guns and just bring it to the city
Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Gotta love that gun control. It's really working wonders.

Ace6301
But the murder rate in Chicago was extremely high even before the gun control was implemented.

shup! don't let facts get in the way of his rhetoric.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#27 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Gotta love that gun control. It's really working wonders.

Ace6301

But the murder rate in Chicago was extremely high even before the gun control was implemented.

The rate should be falling significantly if the laws are worth a damn. The enforcement of existing laws has always been the issue.. not enacting more.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Gotta love that gun control. It's really working wonders.

Rich3232

But the murder rate in Chicago was extremely high even before the gun control was implemented.

shup! don't let facts get in the way of his rhetoric.

It's not rhetoric. If the laws were doing any good, the rate would be dropping.. not just staying about the same.

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] But the murder rate in Chicago was extremely high even before the gun control was implemented.hartsickdiscipl

shup! don't let facts get in the way of his rhetoric.

It's not rhetoric. If the laws were doing any good, the rate would be dropping.. not just staying about the same.

I agree, but to just blatantly assume that if we went the other way wrt to guns, that it would improve the situation is a bit misleading and lacking.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] shup! don't let facts get in the way of his rhetoric. Rich3232

It's not rhetoric. If the laws were doing any good, the rate would be dropping.. not just staying about the same.

I agree, but to just blatantly assume that if we went the other way wrt to guns, that it would improve the situation is a bit misleading and lacking.

We can see that this method isn't working. Let's try it the other way.

Avatar image for gamah_killah
gamah_killah

13020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gamah_killah
Member since 2006 • 13020 Posts
Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.gamah_killah

It's also worth noting that in the UK gun ownership before any bans was still incredibly low. It's just a different society, albeit a good one

Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#33 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts

[QUOTE="gamah_killah"]Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.wis3boi

It's also worth noting that in the UK gun ownership before any bans was still incredibly low. It's just a different society, albeit a good one

It's no better or worse than the US in terms of violence. There's just a different weapon being used.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.gamah_killah

I can't say that I've ever felt particularly unsafe walking around Chicago at night.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="gamah_killah"]Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.jim_shorts

It's also worth noting that in the UK gun ownership before any bans was still incredibly low. It's just a different society, albeit a good one

It's no better or worse than the US in terms of violence. There's just a different weapon being used.

Your odds versus a knife a better than versus a wall of bullets

Avatar image for deactivated-5e97585ea928c
deactivated-5e97585ea928c

8521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5e97585ea928c
Member since 2006 • 8521 Posts

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

It's also worth noting that in the UK gun ownership before any bans was still incredibly low. It's just a different society, albeit a good one

wis3boi

It's no better or worse than the US in terms of violence. There's just a different weapon being used.

Your odds versus a knife a better than versus a wall of bullets

Yeah no doubt, i'll take higher crime rates for less murder rates any day.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#37 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"] It's no better or worse than the US in terms of violence. There's just a different weapon being used.FrostyPhantasm

Your odds versus a knife a better than versus a wall of bullets

Yeah no doubt, i'll take higher crime rates for less murder rates any day.

Murder rate in the US is kinda misleading though. There are certain cities that are downright horrible when it comes to murder, such as D.C., Detroit, Chicago, L.A. etc, but outside cities like that the murder rate is very low. I'm lucky enough to live in a place where violent crime is an afterthought.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

Your odds versus a knife a better than versus a wall of bullets

jim_shorts

Yeah no doubt, i'll take higher crime rates for less murder rates any day.

Murder rate in the US is kinda misleading though. There are certain cities that are downright horrible when it comes to murder, such as D.C., Detroit, Chicago, L.A. etc, but outside cities like that the murder rate is very low. I'm lucky enough to live in a place where violent crime is an afterthought.

Even at that those rates are largely confined to certain areas and not the whole city.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

So 505 murders last year in a city of 2.7 million. The town in southern Illinois where my parents live has a population of like 6,500 and had 3 murders last year. I wonder what that murder rate would be.

worlock77
You want high murder rates in smaller towns, try Flint and Saginaw, michigan. Lol, those are bad. But I dont think Chicago counts as the full 2.7 million. They probably refer to just the urban areas and not its surrounding. So the denominator may be smaller.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="gamah_killah"]Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.worlock77

I can't say that I've ever felt particularly unsafe walking around Chicago at night.

I lived in Philadelphia for 8 years. Never felt unsafe. Most of the violence is not against random strangers, but rather specifically targetted against gang members and such.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

So 505 murders last year in a city of 2.7 million. The town in southern Illinois where my parents live has a population of like 6,500 and had 3 murders last year. I wonder what that murder rate would be.

sonicare

You want high murder rates in smaller towns, try Flint and Saginaw, michigan. Lol, those are bad. But I dont think Chicago counts as the full 2.7 million. They probably refer to just the urban areas and not its surrounding. So the denominator may be smaller.

No, Chicago is 2.7 million. Counting the surrounding areas the number climbs to close to 10 million.

Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#42 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts

Even at that those rates are largely confined to certain areas and not the whole city.

worlock77
Very true. St. Louis is like a second home town to me and there are some really upscale parts to it and some really awful parts to it that give the city its reputation.
Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

Live in London, always assumed it would be more dangerous than that...heck even got beat fvcking Paris....

THIng is you can wander about London at any time during the night and be relatively safe

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Even at that those rates are largely confined to certain areas and not the whole city.

jim_shorts

Very true. St. Louis is like a second home town to me and there are some really upscale parts to it and some really awful parts to it that give the city its reputation.

Same here to a degree. I grew up in southern Illinois and spent quite a lot of time in St. Louis.

Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#45 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Even at that those rates are largely confined to certain areas and not the whole city.

worlock77

Very true. St. Louis is like a second home town to me and there are some really upscale parts to it and some really awful parts to it that give the city its reputation.

Same here to a degree. I grew up in southern Illinois and spent quite a lot of time in St. Louis.

Nice. My hometown is Fort Smith, Arkansas, but I've been to St. Louis a lot of times for things like Cardinals games and whatnot. Love the city museum too. My oldest friend moved to Clayton a while back, so I definitely got to see the more upscale parts of the city. St. Louis can get really ugly really fast though.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Very true. St. Louis is like a second home town to me and there are some really upscale parts to it and some really awful parts to it that give the city its reputation.jim_shorts

Same here to a degree. I grew up in southern Illinois and spent quite a lot of time in St. Louis.

Nice. My hometown is Fort Smith, Arkansas, but I've been to St. Louis a lot of times for things like Cardinals games and whatnot. Love the city museum too. My oldest friend moved to Clayton a while back, so I definitely got to see the more upscale parts of the city. St. Louis can get really ugly really fast though.

In Chicago you had Cabrini-Green (now demolished), one of the nation's worst public housing projects, squeezed inbetween two of Chicago's most affluent neighborhoods.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#47 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="gamah_killah"]Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.worlock77

I can't say that I've ever felt particularly unsafe walking around Chicago at night.

Where were you walking? North side?
Avatar image for dissonantblack
dissonantblack

34009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 dissonantblack
Member since 2005 • 34009 Posts

Not surprising, given they're strict gun laws. People can't defend themselves if they're that strict.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="gamah_killah"]Chicago never feels safe enough to walk outside alone late at night. When I was in London, it's the total opposite: undercover cops were known to always be around. Weapon control was so good that even a knife shown in public could throw you to jail. My uncle there insisted I go explore out on my own before he went to bed. Now I'm back home and miss that safe feeling. People there are so different; more civilized, not even aggressive. I really wish that people here could change.chessmaster1989

I can't say that I've ever felt particularly unsafe walking around Chicago at night.

Where were you walking? North side?

Yes, and central. Not bad areas no, but that's not really relevant to the point.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Not surprising, given they're strict gun laws. People can't defend themselves if they're that strict.

dissonantblack

Given that most of the murders are gang related I'm willing to guess that a lot of the murder victims had guns to defend themselves with.