Growing up I would have said N64 or NES. Super Nintendo is undoubtedly the absolute best, both then and now. When I did something like this a year ago and we laid out all the games, I realized SNES and Gamecube were the best. My point of view changed after going back to the classics, SNES games are better than NES, and GC games are better than N64.
I got this SNES that Christmas, the greatest 2D games are undoubtedly on here, and was last time I only owned just Nintendo, the list of games is too extensive, and the quality too good across the board for NES or N64 to even compete, cause even if NES saw the first in a series or multiple of a franchise, often we saw better iterations on SNES, and N64 didn't see half of these Franchises:
Hard luck naming many Nintendo franchise not on SNES:
Super Mario World
Super Metroid
Earth Bound
Star Fox
F-Zero
Link to the Past
Donkey Kong Country series
Super Mario Kart
Secret of Mana
Chrono Trigger
Super Castlevania 4
Street Fighter 2
Final Fantasy Mystic Quest, 4 and 6
Megaman X series
Harvest Moon
Super Bomberman
the original Tales (Phantasia) (JP only)
Breath of Fire
Mario RPG
Yoshi's Island
Wario's Woods
Contra 3
Illusion of Gaia
Kirby Super Star/Dreamland 3
Super Punch-Out
Super Ghosts and Ghouls
Lemmings
Bust a Move
Earthworm Jim
Mortal Kombat 2
R-Type 3
Lufia series
And we saw major tie-ins, arcade ports, and sports, like Super Star Wars, Ninja Turtles, Power Rangers, NBA Jam, Ken Griffy Jr MLB, NHL Stanly Cup, NCAA Basketball, Sim City, Jurassic Park, Batman, Adams Family, Populous, Spiderman, Captain America, X-Men, Justice League, etc.
-------------------------
Extra Reading:
NES games were hard, cause they were bad, I wouldn't have understood anything unless I looked in magazine/online where you got info from devs. If you played the best on NES (Mario, Zelda, DK, etc.) everything else just seems half as good. Amazing gems on this system (CV, Zelda, FF) but overall most the rest is just nostalgia, and not many games aged well.
N64 games did not age well at all. I have fond memories of N64 as a teenager, so much I grew up rating N64 over everything. And its all cause of the great 4 player local co-op, which was nearly as good as an arcade, but in your house. The gameplay is fun and we saw some of the revolution with Mario/Zelda but we saw the downfall or disappearance in a ton of franchises, or didn't see many new creations (like no Metroid, CV left to PlayStation, and best new creations were all from Rare, a lot of them now on Xbox).
A lot of the stuff on N64 went onto Gamecube, and I think Gamecube did things better overall. I was knee deep in PS1 by N64, and mostly did multiplayer stuff like Guantlet, Goldeneye, and Sports. N64 is cooler than GC and maybe SNES, but i'm mostly in love with the idea of N64-style games. The sad part about my choice, Ocarina, Goldeneye and Mario 64 were probably greatest games ever, but Gamecube saw all the same franchises in just as good games, yet we got revival and renaissance in Nintendo gaming, like Metroid Prime, Pikmin, Fire Emblem, and everything like Rogue, BGaE, Eternal Darkness, and the best versions of RE1 and Metal Gear Solid 1. Plus Gamecube controller and stuff with GBA were revolutionary.
If you look at the bottom of NES and N64, it goes very, very low, while the peak of SNES and Gamecube is sustained for longer. The weakest of the SNES are no where near as bad. I just feel SNES and Gamecube were too cool for their own good. The gaps between them and NES/N64 and SNES/GC aren't that big, the SNES and GC just have the edge. Of course there are really good arguements that say N64 and NES are the greatest things to happen, which I agree with, SNES and GC just took that legacy and improved upon it.
Log in to comment