[QUOTE="PEELEDbanana"] [QUOTE="ston3henge"]"Call of Duty" for a seven-year-old??? Dude, what's WRONG with you? That game has a clearly marked "T" rating... ston3henge
Actually, World at War is M (a really violent one, too). To be quite honest, i doubt much will happen to the kid. All the "accidents related" to video games (i use quotations because it literally is crap that you can blame this stuff on media) is wrong. Those who either kill others or suicide had other things wrong with them.
As for game ideas, Mario Kart is good. Castlevania games i found to have to be very fun. New Super Mario Bros. is amazing (you can't go wrong with a Mario platformer).
Actually, I HAVE THE GAME CASE FOR WaW IN FRONT OF ME RIGHT NOW, and it is clearly rated "T", not "M". And where did you get your "facts" concerning the psychological composition of mentally unstable people as they relate to video game playing? The rating system is in place for a reason. Your armchair therapist assessments hold no water, either.
Check your facts before you correct someone, sonny-boy.
Actually, he's right. It is rated M.
So maybe you check your game case before correcting someone? :P
As for the debate about whether this is appropriate for children... ESRB guidelines are just that: guidelines. It is ultimately left up to the parent to decide what games are appropriate for their child. Usually people don't let children in the single digits see violent movies and games because it scares them and gives them nightmares. If, however, this kid is not getting scared from it (and also is not acting out the violence on other kids) - and that doesn't seem to be a problem from the TC's replies - then really, there's no reason to object to his parental decision.
Log in to comment