PS3 has good sales and games.
PSP has good sales and games.
Vita has been out for a week and is the sexiest piece of gaming hardware, having released at the same price point as it's competitor.
Not seeing it.
All I expect from a system I buy is games, I don't give all this crap about 'oh but their not $3 like iPhone games' or 'dedicated gaming isn't what people want'. The 3DS and Vita have games I want and have more games I want coming out. Why the **** would I care about anything else?
Also this.
Didn't buy a lot of them when they came out cause UMD sucks and expensive, but now a lot of $10-20 games that look and play better. Atlus needs to drop their prices though.
110million
But there's a difference between "good" and expected. I'll concede the PSP because it was a new entry to the market and was up against a hell of a competitor (although I'd argue it could've done much better), but the PS3 was obviously a major disappointment. Sony expected to print money, not lose it for years and then struggle against two GameCubes duct-taped together and a more expensive, less reliable competitor with weaker hardware.
It's great that you enjoy it and all, but I don't think anyone was arguing that you couldn't/wouldn't? The issue is that selling to a niche of 20-30 million "hardcore" gamers can't possibly be what Sony had in mind for the Vita.
Log in to comment