@chimchargirl said:
I dont like when a person say that a realistic graphics videogames are better than others, im like more cell shading, sd or pixel graphics.
i dont like that some people only buy a game because it have realistic graphics and think that games that i play are worse than games that he play..
The TC is knocking down a strawman. Very, very few genres boast designers who strive for visual realism (just sports games and racing sims).
Games like say, The Last of Us, Gears of War, Demon's Souls and Skyrim wouldn't be called realistic in any other context. Only in videogames do we have this tiny group of people (usually Nintendo apologists) who think that anything that doesn't look like a Disney cartoon is realistic.
@zjun said:
That's a bad gamer if they choose Killzone: Shadow Fall over Battlefield 4 for graphics.
This highlights the sort of lazy, nonsensical thinking that tends to fill these threads. In what world is Killzone (filled with sci-fi weapons, massive machines and planets utterly unlike Earth) more realistic than Battlefield (set in the modern world and filled with modern real life weapons)? Zjun's world apparently...
@Lulu_Lulu said:
What about James Cameron's Avatar movie ?
The Graphics were used to add detail to unrealistic things. I'm all for better graphics but not for the sake of realism, but for the sake of better detail, uhm...... Lets call it pseudo realism (making unrealistic things so detailed they could be confused with something real).
Disneyesque art styles are sometimes nice, but just because one is striving to resemble Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings movies more than a Pixar movie doesn't meant that one is striving for realism.
Log in to comment