Is it just me or are the Prince of Persia games hard?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#1 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

I decided to give Prince of Persia Sands of Time a playthrough but there was this one point in the game where I could just not progress because the enemies kept attacking me in waves and some of the puzzles were a bit of pain. Am I the only one who has experienced this or are the games pretty hard.

Avatar image for rilpas
rilpas

8161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 rilpas
Member since 2012 • 8161 Posts
the combat is the weakest part of the Sands of Time, but I feel everything else is great, especially the characters, enjoy them while you can, you'll never see the same prince or the same Farrah after the first sands of time game
Avatar image for Dudersaper
Dudersaper

32952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: -3

#3 Dudersaper
Member since 2007 • 32952 Posts
It's only hard during some combat parts, you can get easily surrounded and get your butt kicked. But the puzzles (apart from one, with the moon symbols or something like that) are fairly easy, so is the platforming.
Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#4 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

The combat in the first sucks compared to the others, which makes it mroe artificially challenging. Aside from that no it's not a hard game. The last two are easier than the first because of the combat and the fact that the Sands of Time guage doesn't reset every time you get more sand.

Avatar image for flipin_jackass
flipin_jackass

9772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 flipin_jackass
Member since 2004 • 9772 Posts
It wasn't that bad, and I'm the type who rage-quits easy. The hardest was the first time I had to wall jump back and forth multiple times. That took me forever. After like a million tries, I finally found my rhythm.
Avatar image for GreekGameManiac
GreekGameManiac

6439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 GreekGameManiac
Member since 2010 • 6439 Posts

Nah,atleast not The Sands of Time.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13565 Posts

The SOTs trilogy and the 2008 one aren't difficult. But they are great games.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#8 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts

I think it's just you. I certainly didn't find The Sands of Time that hard at all. It was challenging, but not hard.

Avatar image for angryfodder
angryfodder

20490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 angryfodder
Member since 2007 • 20490 Posts
I used to struggle with the original on my Atari ST
Avatar image for Apathetic_Prick
Apathetic_Prick

4789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Apathetic_Prick
Member since 2003 • 4789 Posts

Having only played the original Prince of Persia on a monochrome Apple laptop and an NES and then Sands of Time...Sands of Time is nothing in comparison to the original in terms of difficulty.

I did find combat to be a pain because of the camera angles, though; sometimes the camera would just whip right around and reverse your controls in the middle of the fight or rotate to an area that prevents you from seeing yourself and stay locked there. That's really my only complaints with the game's difficulty, but it happened so often that I gave up on it.

Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13717 Posts

a bit frustrating but if i can beat it, anyone can. im not that good when it comes to difficult action games....so its passable

Avatar image for Sali217
Sali217

1301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Sali217
Member since 2012 • 1301 Posts
The originals were wayyyyyyyyyy harder than the newer ones.
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

Echoing that the original games were WAAAAAAAAAAAAY harder.

-Byshop

Avatar image for Megavideogamer
Megavideogamer

6554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 Megavideogamer
Member since 2004 • 6554 Posts

It is just the jumping mechanics and puzzles that can be a pain. They are platformers so the jumpy bits are going to be iffy at times. The first Playstation Prince of Persia had a horrid camera. But Death by Camera wasn't possible. Since you didn't actually die. All Prince of Persia games have the you have to patient with.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

7270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 judaspete
Member since 2005 • 7270 Posts
Sands of Time gets pretty hard because of the sections with really long waves of enemies teleporting in all around you. Every game after that is much easier. Stick with it though. Sands of Time is my favorite one despite it's flawed combat.