@bfmv2007 said:
Once again, the US Government is planning on taxing violent video games, and obviously hoping to make developers shut down. Anyone think this might actually happen, or will it be shot down like all the other attempts? It's been scientifically proven numerous times already that violent games don't make people violent, or motivate people to commit murder, or crime in general. Is that not good enough? FYI this only applies to the violent games. Non violent games, like the sports games, would not be affected. http://washingtonexaminer.com/gop-tax-plan-singles-out-violent-video-game-makers/article/2544733
"Scientifically proven numerous times...." Care to share this research? I did my dissertation which include video game violence and there are many papers which point towards violence in games can cause a priming of aggression in people. There are some grey areas with games such as Mario where you jump on peoples heads to "kill" something which do little to prime aggression, so its more of a visual priming of violent imagery such as weapons, blood and acts of violence that can cause people to show increased levels of aggression.
There is no evidence to prove let along seriously suggest that playing GTA and murdering people will make you a murderer. However playing those games, being exposed to them and inflicting the actions of murdering & mutilating game characters does have a real effect on people.
There is a horrible amount of ignorance and over defensive play by the majority of both sides of the argument.
My argument to anyone would be. If a game is so separate to how you act in real life, if you were to see someone playing a game that involved the raping of children in the most disgusting way possible, would you allow for the fact that is it is "a game" so it is OK, or would you say that the person playing is allowing the actions of something so disgusting to happen has some reflection upon their personality and mental well being. Personally I would think that there was something wrong with someone wanting to do that.
I know there are some...many blurred lines and areas of grey on the subject and it really deserves a large open debate, but I feel that the simple marking of the subject as either "it does" or "it doesn't" is not correct and damaging.
Log in to comment