Come on you guys! This a bloody good game. It is really underappriciated!
and I could not fix it for a week. When i finally fixed it, the torrents were allready downloaded, so it was not worth it. So i sat, and waited.
In Sebia games usually come out 2 months afterwards. This time it was infinite. I couldn't find this game anywhere. Later I had to pay 30$ extra, because my relatives from Sweden had to import it to me. No matter.
Warhammer Mark of Chaos managed to satisfy me, and I don't regret those extra 30$. I really don't know why do people keep saying ,,Total letdown'' and ,,broken piece of crap'' and such.
The game has one of the best graphics I have ever seen. Even if you put the detail level to LOW, it will still look a lot better than, i don't know, World of Warcraft, or something far more appriciated like that. The game itself is a masterpiece, and at first I was sceptical about Namco Bandai, but, i was wrong. Warhammer MOC is a exellent game. The sound is awesome ( Especially the voice acting ), the graphics are beautiful, and the game is fun to play as WoW in beta. The people who say that the game sucks ass, are only focusing on the bad things about the game ( very minor ).
Ok, there are only 2 campaigns, but if you enjoy tabletop Warhammer, what else could you want? You get to control the Chaos for ****s sake! THE Chaos.
4 Races. So What? The Skaven, High Elves, The Hordes of Chaos, and The Empire. The 4 capital races of the Warhammer world. ( The Skaven and the High Elves are mortal enemies, and so are The Hordes of Chaos and The Empire ). And 2 more races to assis you. The Orcs and Goblins, and The Dwarfs. The Vampire counts are dragging through 2 missions, but they ARE making an appereance anyway. No, that is not bad at all.
No buildings. So ****ing what? Who needs buildings, when you can blast Demons with your cannon? And anyway, maybe it would be more realistic if it would be like Total War ( Any of them, i don't care ), but whats wrong with this? The Lord of the Rings - The Battle for Middle Earth series had absolutely no building on the battle map ( not on the actual one ), and yet that game is getting better ratings than this one? I would say so. And I wouldn't say NO BUILDINGS for Mark of Chaos. I would say, NO BUILDING. And if this game was made as Warcraft, or Empire Earth, i would literaly kill myself. I hate it that in Warcraft and in such games you have an unlimited supply of units, as long as you have wood and gold ( or even just gold if you are building Footmen, Grunts, Ghouls, or Archers - the basics ). Tha
hmm...what is there else...ah yes
Too Short. No it is not. Maybe the campaign is short, but that's why you have 2 of them, and that is why you have the multiplayer. It's not THAT expensive to play online. Just buy the original game. And by the way, playing Mark of Chaos with a other players is as fun as jumping into a pool of ,,Mars, Snickers and Twix'' candy bars.
In conclusion, i really don't know what do you people have against this game. The devs worked really hard to complete it, and they have, and they have done a terrific job. And if you are unhappy with this game, then just go play Warcraft or some other very popular, but yet not a masterpiece, game.