@Warlord_Irochi Oookay, so an Xbox fanboy comes here bashing my comment, and calls ME a fanboy? Interesting...very interesting. The question that invites itself here is: if I were a fanboy...fanboy of WHAT?? PCs?? Hardcore FPS games? Mouses and keyboards? Obviously the very term "fanboy" is incompatible with non-brand things like that. A Fanboy, by definition, must be attached to a brand. A brand like Xbox, for example, which Warlord_Irochi is obviously attached to, defending his precious little box. Awww...how cute. =)
Aaah, that's a good one. Where do those marketing professionals and copywriting savvies in Microsoft live exactly? Seriously! Why make hardcore FPS gamers laugh at you?
Hardcore shooter = mouse and keyboard, in case you haven't noticed for the past 20 years, Microsoft. No, no, no, I'm not saying PC rules (even though that [is] true); I'm just saying mouse & keyboard. When your damn box can support mouse & keyboard use with FPS games, let's talk “hardcore shooting”, hm? Fair enough? Yes? Yes.
Arguments about this are definitely retarded in nature, because it is not opinion, but fact that, regardless to any specific game, the order of these systems from best performer has always been: PC, then PS3, then X360.
Only a person who has never owned a high-end gaming PC can ever have doubts about PC being superior, because only on a high-end PC at Ultra settings and an a PC monitor can you see the world of detail difference between what you're seeing and what you'd see on a plasma HDTV from a console.
Then, aside from the fact that PS3 comes, out of the box, with existing advantages that X360 doesn't have, like the rechargeable wireless & wired gamepads (wired when recharging them, and wireless when already charged), a smarter choice of disc-insertion mechanism on the PS3 for when the console is standing (I own both systems, so I know what it is like to make the console stand, then try to insert a disc; PS3 is better and smarter in this), PS3 coming with a wireless internet card already, and finally the PS3 again coming with blu-ray capability, aside from all these advantages of the PS3, it is also a technical fact that the PS3 is more powerful than the X360.
Accordingly, opinions have no place here anymore, and also comparing a SINGLE game is irrelevant; I personally don't care if ONE game developer did not have enough technical expertise or simply did not care enough to utilize the power of each system to the fullest and preferred to develop for ONE system, then "port" or adapt the game to the other 2 systems...why do I care if one or more developers did that? In the end, I know that technically there is absolutely no informed argument about the PC-PS3-X360 sequence here. And by the way, I own all those 3 systems: a powerful gaming PC, the PS3, and the X360. So I know what I'm talking about from a visual perspective, let alone the factual technical perspective.
I hope some people have some food for thought now. Please care less about what one developer does with one game; because the order of superiority is an established fact from a technical and feature perspective.
Serves them right; spending so much on thoroughly irrelevant cinematic trailers, rather than diverting that budget to improve a game with potential. Never played the first; most certainly passing on this one, too. Seriously, folks, less irrelevant cinematic trailers...more well-developed games. Thanks.
There is no “drama”, Orthy; that's just another reason, among many—I hasten to add, to just ignore Microsoft / Xbox, and hope that Sony / PS4 will know better than to copy you, guys. And please speak for yourself; that's the world [you] live in. I, for one, am not “always on”: I'm actually living. Deal with it.
Yep...may DRM fanaticism and "thou-shalt-be-online-while-playing-games" bring down more and more games...and bring down despicable publishers and developers. Amen.
@_el_Greco_ Blizzard is fading away, slowly but surely, and I predict, will fall in a shockingly sudden manner one day. Most of the good people in the company have already left anyway, and only scumbags are left. It'll be good to see them falling with it in their boundless arrogance.
Just out of curiosity, I do play this game, but...does anyone really argue that the Illuminati did not bring you this game? That they aren't saying "we were here" ALL over the game and its cover? Just curious, is all.
@theCCyberDDemon @yasso @misterbanks87 I'd rather see BioWare admitting that they have failed us miserably in ME3, and have totally ****ed up the story, especially after the MAIN writer left BioWare (which is probably why ME3 got messed up in the first place and some executive jerk got to pull the strings to spread Transhumanism instead of produce a great finale)...and just re-do the whole thing really. Get back Mass Effect's main writer to the team, re-write ME3 properly, and call ME3: Reloaded or something like that, let us fight Cerberus in it, then in ME4 we get our REAL epic finale and the beautiful ending for the story that we all grew to love. And yes, mate, one man can always hope...or two men, in our case.
yasso's comments