@HaRdNiPs How much does the 7990 cost? and the 680 is $450 and what was the price of the 7980 when it came out? $700? now its $400 and only offers half the performance of the 680. And sense this article is about stealing secrets the AMD 7000 series uses almost identical architecture as the original CUDA core design in the Nvidia 200 series, how did they do that?
@Sharon The problem really is that the only game developer for the Wii U is Nintendo. And this argument wasnt about the failing DS line it is about the fail of the Wii and what Nintendo needs to do to save the Wii U. Children do not by the games and are not the majority of the market, they should try to incorporate more of the gaming mark, and how do u do that, o by having 3rd party developers.
Good news for everyone who hates my post, there is something that i really like about the Wii U. It was designed by IBM but it has an AMD graphics card2222222222
@enrique_marrodz The Wii started motion gaming but withing two years both sony and microsoft just updated there products and created something much more advanced and there where in HD wow.
@BlazeODU Not really angry but would rather see something really good rather than just ok come from Nintendo. The Wii never had any good games come out because no game developers cared about it. Hopefully Nintendo stays alive, I would hate to see one of the founders disappear.
This might help the failing Nintendo company for a year or two until everyone realizes that just like the Wii the Wii U is fun for a few hours and has horrible graphics. Is it any clue that most of the large game development companies are only putting a couple of games out on the Wii U. Gear Box is only putting one of its next four games on the thing. EA doesn't plan any of its big hits. The only game that is out and going to be out on this thing is Black Ops II and games that Nintendo make themselves, but how many Marios can there be? Nintendo has brought innovation and help start the hole gaming thing but with its huge loses ( $461.2 Million in 2011) the Wii U might only be a life preserver and not the rescue ship Nintendo needs.
Being the one that comes out with a radical gaming system every time is not a safe way to be. No gamers will ever take the Wii U seriously, we want a controller in our hands, a mouse or keyboard, and something that looks good. The only way this could succeed is if Nintendo can get real game development companies like Activision, EA, and Ubisoft to actually care about the system because none of them do right now.
@buccomatic The controller is different from the PS and PS2 ones, and they us sixaxis g sensors, have u ever played a ps3. AND the xbox controller hasn't changed except for the bumpers to make it more like a ps3 controller and that crappy rumble pack
I disagree with just about everything in this article. Who cares if it is a little bit more expensive you get a lot more, the controller is way better then the 360's, they have more exclusive FPS than the 360. Killzone and Resistance, both great game series. The playstation network is so much easier to navigate than live. I have both systems, i havent turned on my 360 in 6 months, I play my PS3 everyday; plus blu ray = awesome. This article was definitely written by a 360 fan boy. After testing both networks, PSN has faster connection speeds and runs online games like call of duty much faster and with less lag than Xbox Live. They really dont need to change to much, except upgrade the hardware and they should wait one more generation of processors and gpu's, and they better stay with Nvidia or it wont be any different than the next microsoft p o s
wazzup222's comments