verparanoidpers' forum posts

Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts

I'd like to point out something to everyone who voted Osama...

On the left, we have an image from the ONLY evidence we have that connects Bin Laden to 9/11. He has on record, denied any involvement in the attacks. Well...unless you really think that's him on the left...

D9-THC
did you actually watch the confession tapes?
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"][QUOTE="Dasacant"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"]

[QUOTE="GD-1369211121"]it was 7 years ago people get over it already, obviously it was osamaAnimeKiller

Its not obvious that it is Osama. There has been noreal evidence that links the attacks on 9/11 to Osama.

Besides the fact he said it was him or that he is the leader of AQ and it was linked to AQ?

If Osama was behind it, does it explain why the government is lying to us?

when did the government lie to us about 9/11?

When you think of 9/11, you can remember planes flying into the Twin Towers. Can you tell me when have you ever seen a video of a plane flying into the Pentagon?

I didn't see the plane hit the pentagon, but I know that there was plane debris in the pentagon

You don't know there was plane debris. You heard there was plane debris. At the site of the crash, there were no luggage, human remains or anything that might indicate a plane hitting the Pentagon.

what about the engine parts and the landing gear?
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="azzydraco"]

It was defiently in inside job!

I know someone whose relative works for travel airlines they're able to know when a plane is hijacked within 1 minute. Now, how long did it take between planes being hijacked and crashing into the twin towers? Someone knew it was going to happen long before the planes hit, and nobody did anything about it.

..that sounds pretty suspicous to me..

Just like Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was planned from the start as an excuse to get into war.

AnimeKiller

Of course people knew the planes were hijacked after losing contact with pilots, but how were they to know that the hijackers were planning to crash themselves into a couple of skyscrapers? What were people supposed to do - abandon every building on the eastern seaboard?

If a plane was hijacked, it would still show up in the radar and would be approached by a fighter jet. If it doesn't land in a designated spot and respond within a certain amount of time, it will be shot down before crashing into any skyscrapers. 9/11 was an inside job.

the planes were on the ground, and it takes several hours to arm them.
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"][QUOTE="Dasacant"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"]

[QUOTE="GD-1369211121"]it was 7 years ago people get over it already, obviously it was osamaAnimeKiller

Its not obvious that it is Osama. There has been noreal evidence that links the attacks on 9/11 to Osama.

Besides the fact he said it was him or that he is the leader of AQ and it was linked to AQ?

If Osama was behind it, does it explain why the government is lying to us?

when did the government lie to us about 9/11?

When you think of 9/11, you can remember planes flying into the Twin Towers. Can you tell me when have you ever seen a video of a plane flying into the Pentagon?

I didn't see the plane hit the pentagon, but I know that there was plane debris in the pentagon
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="Dracargen"]

No, but it does mean "thou shalt not kill" can be warped by greedy men into "Thou shalt kill when thou wilt."

What I meant by Christianity justifying the Crusades is that the pope said "God wills it!" When in fact Man wills it. It is actually a form of blasphomey.

It implies that there is a major flaw in humanity.

Decessus

How do you know what God wills and what he doesn't? You claim that that the Pope, and all of those who followed the Pope misinterpreted what the Bible says, but they are reading the same thing you are. What makes you think that your interpretation is correct and there interpretation is incorrect?

because no where in the bible does it justify the crusades
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="Dasacant"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"]

[QUOTE="GD-1369211121"]it was 7 years ago people get over it already, obviously it was osamaAnimeKiller

Its not obvious that it is Osama. There has been noreal evidence that links the attacks on 9/11 to Osama.

Besides the fact he said it was him or that he is the leader of AQ and it was linked to AQ?

If Osama was behind it, does it explain why the government is lying to us?

when did the government lie to us about 9/11?
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="Dasacant"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="AnimeKiller"]

[QUOTE="GD-1369211121"]it was 7 years ago people get over it already, obviously it was osamawemhim

Its not obvious that it is Osama. There has been noreal evidence that links the attacks on 9/11 to Osama.

if you ignore osama confessing to it, and kalied sheik mohammad confessing to it, yes, there is no evidence that osama was linked to 9/11

Beat me to it :( ;)

but da videoz wuz a fake d00d!!!

LOL, there were like 4 frames where osama bin laden looked different.
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="Dracargen"][QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]

That's one commandment, not ten. Again.....answer my question.

Decessus

You obviously do not understand Christianity.

You cannot pick one commandment to not follow and follow all the others.

Unless, of course, God deemed it no longer necessary.;)

Jesus also added to the Ten Commandments. If you hate somebody, then that is equivalent to murder. If you lust for a woman when you already are engaging in a relationship, then that is equivalent to adultery. Technically, the Ten Commandments from the OT do not matter as much as the Commandments from Christ.

Earlier you said the pope is the figurehead of Christianity. That is wrong on as many levels as possible. Jesus is the figurehead of Christianity; Nobody else.

Until the Reformation, the Pope was the spiritual leader of Christianity.

the bible doesn't contain any thing about popes or even anything related to the concept of a pope
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts

[QUOTE="GD-1369211121"]it was 7 years ago people get over it already, obviously it was osamaAnimeKiller

Its not obvious that it is Osama. There has been noreal evidence that links the attacks on 9/11 to Osama.

if you ignore osama confessing to it, and kalied sheik mohammad confessing to it, yes, there is no evidence that osama was linked to 9/11
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts

Zeitgeist can clear it all up.

AnimeKiller
that movie has been refuted so many times
Avatar image for verparanoidpers
verparanoidpers

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 verparanoidpers
Member since 2007 • 695 Posts

[QUOTE="Dracargen"]

Oh! The Pope said it, so it was a part of Christianity! IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!!!!!:o:o:o:o

Seriously, the Pope said that in order to get more recruits. . .that should be painfully obvious, unless you'd like to point out in the Bible where it says "Thou must go to a Crusade, or you will not enter Heaven."

Donkey_Puncher

I consider you brush up on your medieval history including the crusades.

It's irrelevant that the Bible doesn't contain any passages about Crusading, the fact is that the Catholic church declared them and Tens of Thousands of Christians followed in it's wake. The figure head of a religion demanded a crusade, and Christians answered, hence the crusades were a result of Christian fanatisism.

in the context of the debate that we're having, its completely relevant as it destroys your argument that christianity caused the crusades