If there's one factor we know about the video games business, it is that no success goes uncopied. World of Warcraft breaks one million subscribers, everyone begins building WoW-like MMOs. Minecraft showers its creator with enough cash to purchase his home nation, voxel-primarily based crafting games fall like rain. It is just how things go.
It ought to come as no surprise, then, that some studio someplace would attempt to piggyback on the success of DayZ, Dean Hall's ridiculously popular mod for Arma II. The title, which drops players right into a dangerous, zombie-stuffed open world and challenges them to survive, resonated so immensely with avid gamers that a clone wasn't a lot probable because it was inevitable.
But Infestation: Survivor Tales, formerly recognized because the Conflict Z, is more than only a clone of DayZ. It is a charmless, cynical, and craven rip-off packaged with some of the sinister microtransaction models ever carried out into a recreation, and it's developed by a company that has on a number of events proven itself to be only shades away from a devoted fraud manufacturing unit.
Jumping on the bandwagon
Earlier than I get to the meat of this whole thing, let's be upfront: Loads of ink has been spilled over Survivor Conflict Infestation: Z Tales and its creator, Hammerpoint Interactive, in the past. Due to the sport's checkered origins, colorful developer personalities, and continuous problems with hackers and security, it is nearly inconceivable to analyze on its own merits. The title would not exist in a vacuum, nor can it ever.
Reception to the unique launch of the sport was very, very bad. The sport's Metacritic rating is an abysmal 20/100, accompanied by a user rating of 1.5. Mentioned in the damaging reviews are a few widespread themes: The sport is a sloppy DayZ clone, it has a vicious and exploitive fee mannequin, it would not deliver on any of its guarantees, it is stuffed with bugs and half-carried out ideas, and many others. Nonetheless, MINECRAFTSERVERS of those reviews had been written back in January, proper at the time the title landed on digital shelves.
Since it's now July and the oldsters at Hammerpoint have had roughly six months to improve upon the preliminary product (and their dealings with the community), it seems like a good sufficient time to present the title a re-examination. That is especially true because it not too long ago acquired a reputation change and simply final week popped up within the Steam summer season sale, that means hundreds of latest customers are doubtlessly being uncovered to it with out having a transparent concept of what it is or whether they should buy it.
Possibly it isn't as dangerous as everyone claims. Perhaps it is not the nefarious cash-grab of a bunch of video recreation con artists. And possibly, simply perhaps, a bunch of elitist video game writers merely crowded right into a clown car of negativity and proceeded to excessive-5 each other for their brilliance while heaping scorn on a game that deserved better.
Spoiler alert: Possibly not.
The experience
The core concept behind Infestation: Survivor Stories is easy and stunning: You're alone, you're fragile, and you need to survive. Your character begins his journey in the midst of the Colorado wilderness with solely a flashlight, granola bar, and a soda, and must find a manner to stay alive with out drawing the wrath of wandering zombie hordes or murderous and greedy human players. You may die of thirst, you may die of hunger, you can die from injuries, and you'll die of zombie infection.
Most likely, although, you'll die at the hands of another participant, and this death will happen inside 10 minutes of your logging into the sport. It is because the world is so boring and bland that players actually have nothing better to do than stalking across the woods in search of newbies, executing them, and taking all of their stuff. Your first lesson on this game is straightforward: Other gamers are more harmful than anything else the world has to offer.
Player-killing is so rampant and ridiculous that avoiding ganks is pretty much the core focus of the sport. This is a real story from my playtime: Another participant, trailed by a gaggle of zombies, stopped working and died just so he might beat me to demise with a baseball bat. Any semblance of "trying to survive" is undercut by the truth that nobody playing the game actually cares, at all, about dwelling in the truth of the world. Since you don't start with a weapon and each participant you find yourself encountering appears to already have an arsenal, it makes for a really excruciating experience.
The sport tries that can assist you out on this department by assigning rankings to players primarily based on their actions. New gamers are "Civilians," players who homicide those civilians earn titles like "Bandit" and "Assassin," whereas gamers killing the villainous players are given titles like "Guardian" or "Constable." There is a theoretical endgame here that involves heroes battling villains to keep civilians secure, but a number of problems cease it from functioning.
The most obvious downside is that the nice majority of gamers on any given server are villains. It isn't uncommon to see dozens of villainous rankings on the scoreboard, just a few civilians, and one or two good guys. There isn't any actual motive to align a method or one other, so most players seem to take the ganking route for the easy kills and free gear. Another drawback is that with out villains, there may be no good guys, that means ganking new players is an absolute requirement for the game's core design to perform.
"Nothing in this game makes the reward worth the risk."
There are several safe zones scattered around the world map. In a safe zone you cannot be killed by other players or zombies and may visit the general retailer or in-recreation vault as needed. In fact, these secure zones are actually nothing more than baited traps for civilians, as gangs of players often just stand exterior of the entrances and exits and murder anyone attempting to get in or out. There isn't any penalty, no guard system, and no motive to not do it. Moreover, why buy stuff at the final store when you can steal that same stuff immediately off of the contemporary corpse you just created along with your gank posse?
The utter lack of consequences and vulnerability of recent players combines to create an experience that feels unwelcoming, unfulfilling, and very cheap. The core pattern of a typical life in Infestation: Survivor Tales is this: Log in, spend twenty minutes running although repetitive, boring environments, discover one thing fascinating, get killed by a sniper whereas attempting to method that one thing attention-grabbing, log out, repeat with new character.
Nothing in this sport makes the reward worth the risk.
The mechanics
Infestation: Survivor Stories does manage to achieve one incredible feat: It one way or the other tops one of many least enjoyable player experiences of all time by layering that experience in a damaged mess so full of hacks, glitches, and bugs that it is superb the game even begins.
Punkbuster, applied to prevent hacking (unsuccessfully, apparently, as you will see literally dozens of hackers banned per play session), constantly boots everybody offline. Jumping the unsuitable means on a hill or rock causes your character to float by means of the air when you run. Zombie AI is so terrible it'd as nicely not exist -- you possibly can avoid zombies by working in circles, walking backwards, or leaping on virtually any object. Stand on a wheelbarrow and you are rendered invisible to the zombie plenty, free to beat them unsatisfyingly to loss of life with no matter weapon you could have available (if you have one, because you positively can't punch or kick).
Don't believe me? Here is a spotlight reel:
Nearly something you can imagine that could be improper with a recreation is incorrect with the game. Graphics pop and flicker. Framerates drop inexplicably into the teens at random. The out of doors environment is full of bushes you possibly can run right by, and the interiors are nothing greater than hollow gray cubes with no furnishings, no decorations, no character, and no context. Water is fairly sufficient, however your character cannot enter it (or drink it, because hey, Hammerpoint sells drinks in the store). Property are repeated endlessly; the same 5 automobiles litter each street, the same six or seven zombies populate every nook.
The sound is horrifying, but not in a "zombies are so scary" manner. Crickets screech endlessly through the day and evening, though the point at which the audio loop restarts is painfully apparent each time it occurs. Some surfaces have footstep noises, some don't. Zombie groans are weird, repetitive rasps with no variation. And the grunts and growls your character makes characterize what is probably going the least convincing voice work ever recorded since recording voices grew to become one thing people may do.
Put merely: Virtually everything that was wrong with this recreation when it launched in January is still flawed with it, and Hammerpoint doesn't seem to care within the slightest.
The money
Regardless of the failings of its design and the complete inability to ship on its premise, Infestation: Survivor Stories nonetheless manages to pack in a single final insult to the grievous harm that it represents to lovers of zombies and gaming usually: Some of the underhanded, sneaky, and predatory monetization schemes ever packaged into a sport.
This can be a title that is designed to milk every doable greenback out of you, and to do it with ruthless aggression. The in-sport retailer provides a number of helpful objects and upgrades resembling ammunition, food, drinks, and drugs. As a result of these things are in extraordinarily restricted provide in the game world (and venturing into a populated space to search out them often results in a participant-fired bullet to the brain), it's nearly a necessity to purchase them in the shop. Many can be bought with in-game currency, however the prices are so astronomical that you are more more likely to have supplies fall from the sky and land in your bag than to have the coin readily available to make the acquisition.
"Not one characteristic of this game was designed without the explicit goal of bilking players out of cash."
It is not nearly the shop, though. When you purchase the game (because remember, it is not free-to-play), you'll have only one character template available. Other templates exist, however if you want to play as anyone apart from the default dude, you may should pony up the money. When you find yourself inevitably ganked by a bored participant who managed to find a gun, your character is locked offline for an hour -- until you buy your means again in. You might have 5 character slots and might log in as one other character, however the dead one stays dead till you hand over your dollars or wait out the hour. Each action in this game past opening the login screen comes with some form of additional price.
Most significantly, the objects you buy in the store along with your real-life money are lost whenever you die. In the event you spend a few bucks getting your character prepped for survival with food and provides (guns, thankfully, are the one thing the store does not sell) solely to get instantly popped by a roaming bandit, all of that actual-life money simply vanished into the air. This only makes ganking more engaging to the villains of the world, as it is far smarter to steal things from other gamers than to purchase them your self and risk dropping your investment.
Not one characteristic of this recreation was designed without the express function of bilking players out of money.
A tragedy of exploitation
As I write this, there are 8,000 people taking part in Infestation: Survivor Tales on Steam. There isn't a query that immense demand exists for a hardcore zombie survival recreation set in an open world, and that demand is strong sufficient to push even something this horribly made into Steam's top 50 (Valve's questionable decision to include the game in its summer time sale certainly didn't assist). Hammerpoint figured this out early, in fact, and capitalized on that knowledge by hurriedly growing the rotten husk of an thought and shoveling it out to the lots packaged with unimaginable guarantees and solely the worst of intentions.
Infestation: Survivor Stories, aka The Battle Z is a terrible, horrible recreation. It's terrible in every way potential. And seeing how little it has improved with six months of post-release development time is indication sufficient that it will proceed to be terrible till the population dips sufficient for Hammerpoint to shut it down and begin looking for its subsequent easy jackpot.
I've heard the word shameless earlier than, but only now do I really grasp the meaning.
Ideas? Electronic mail me: mike@massively.com
Massively's not huge on scored reviews -- what use are these to ever-changing MMOs? That's why we convey you first impressions, previews, fingers-on experiences, and even follow-up impressions for almost each recreation we stumble across. First impressions depend for lots, but games evolve, so why should not our opinions?
vasefront8's comments