they appear to be the best team in baseball statistically, but knowing nothing about baseball, are they? Or is it just that the rest of that division would have posed more of a challenge if they had been drawn from high school leagues across the country?

also mon the Scotland!!

slightly higher prices on some products and services, more money for the poorest X% and less money for those who were earning just over the new minimumbefore it came in as companies will lower their wages to the new minimum and say to new employees how great it is they updated so quickly.

if the Uk experiecne has anything to go by.

if your in search of a laptop then yes buy a macbook, since they are well suited for that, but not for desktops :evil:ConManWithGun

Officially, i think creationism should be taught where i heard about it: in the Religious Education classroom.

As there is very little empirical evidence in favour of Creationism it should not be taught in the way that the concept of light waves going through "the ether" is not taught at school, or the "flat earth theory" is not taught.

Obviously there are flaws in any theory of evolution or natural selection, that is why it is called a theory. But by the same token biblical creationism or even intelligent design would not register on the scientific scale. And yes the name given to a part of science is important:

Laws are proven facts for the given conditions (eg Ohm's Law, Newton's Laws etc)

Theories have a strong body of evidence but contain something that makes it impossible to prove for sure, or it has not yet be extensively tested in all possible situations (eg Theory of general relativity)

and then things such as principles, which seem to have less basis but hold (pauli exclusion principle etc.)

and so on down the scale

Just finished watching a horror movie marathon and was wondering how many of you believe in ghosts, werewolves or vampires. Personnaly I don't but I would like to hear your thoughts.Drizzt13

12 year olds

yes coz of course Jesus was the ONLY man to be crucified......i can see why it may be offensive if you happen to be very anti crucifixion and/or know some1 who died in such a way (the Japanese used it until only a handful of generations ago)

Religions need to be less uptight about being mocked, otherwise you just open yourself up to more and more of it. If, like the rest of the world, you can learn to take a joke at your own expense then perhaps those opposed to religions might be a tad less vociferous. Fact is this movie wqs in no way trying to oppose your right to practise your religion, or restrict your freedoms to do so, it was merely making a political comment.

Which was as much about modern times as ancient ones if you actually WATCH the movie....

it happened, however pointless it was. It was all about macho testosterone and posturing. That and the "real" threat of the other side putting weapons in space, which still pisses people off today.

Also most of the "evidence" against it is in fact misunderstandings and based on wrong physics.