lol... they did a flyby test? how unreliable in actual in game scenarios with dozens of combatants, you won't see this. gamespot, this is totally inreliable information you're giving out here... people are going to get 1/3 this performance in a big match, why lie?

the game looks ugly at high settings. it's very high post processing that allows the light rays through the trees. this game looks like ass even on my 8800 GTX. what a pile of **** =( Do you see that screenshot up there, right above the benchmarks with the guy manning the gun turret and the light passing through the trees? on high settings, none of that is there... there's no light whatsoever. why show screenshots of a game that don't represent the benchmark tests? they're testing it on high, so why the hell show very high screens?

lol.... crysis looks like ass at high quality... the lighting, the foliage, the god rays through trees and terrain, all gone... but the game doesn't run, it crawls when at very high, even on the best graphics card... honestly, this game looks like ass, and forget about anti aliasing. xp very high and vista very high look the exact same, but xp performs 20% better.

a well done video feature ;)

lol... talk about the worst **** picture day of all time =) half of them are cross eyed =)

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

good work, gamespot. just doing your part to devalue the meager meaning of achievement points even more...