No Mr. Dan Chiappini, the answer is no. Fans want GOW3esque look, gameplay, scale, and dynamic essentially because why change a perfect 10 game? Just extend it further changing out what needs to be changed (new weapons, new Gods, and new nude scenes) but sticking to the roots (vast scale, super great map concepts, and a pissed off Kratos).

Me and multiplayer...hmmm...last name basis at best. Borderlands multiplayer is the only multiplayer I've ever enjoyed. GOW needs to be at least 75% single focused and 25% multi focused.

Assassin's Creed III is so popular because it's based on Historic USA. Some of the most famous (George Washington, Jefferson, Ben Franklin, etc.) and infamous (John Wilkes Booth, Benedict Arnold, Slave masters in general, etc.) are expected to be abound in the AC3 universe. I've never liked AC at all, but might pick this one up just based on the forefathers alone.

This very simply comes to this. I want the best for my offspring. I want their lives to be easy as chocolate. If my child turns out to be gay trans, or bi-sexual...they will receive love just the same as if they weren't. But, and this is a major but, If I had a choice to actually choose what my child would be, I would undoubtedly choose for my child to be straight. I WOULD NOT leave it to chance. Parents of autistic children, if granted the choice, would absolutely choose for their child to be born normal as would I. Answer me this, all of you, in your honest opinion, If you HAD to make a choice between ONLY gay trans, or bi-sexual versus plain old straight, which would you choose? You know my choice.

@liam72 Yea that's true. 1 billion extra people in just about 5-7 years. Geesh. Maybe trans, gay and bi-sexualism is nature's answer to population control. Even though you were being somewhat comical, you have a valid point. Again, I have no problem with gays, trans, or bi-sexuals. I truly love all people of all types. I just have an insatiable need to convey the truth.

@Freezeryder You can't argue large facts with small facts. I'm aware of the1 out of 100 million species (bonobos) where males have sex with males (strange thing is, they are "intelligent" and share 95% of human DNA, possibly why they have homosexual tendencies). But you cannot discount the 99,999,999 million other species that have been FUUUUCKING for millions of years (forgive my language if you are underage). MILLIONS OF YEARS OF heterosexual fornication. MILLIONS OF YEARS of instinctual yearning for the female genetalia by males and vice versa. MILLIONS OF YEARS CANNOT BE DENIED. THIS IS FACT. Not emotion. Not some silly assed human being trying to actually fool him/herself into believing that it's "OK" (BY EVOLUTIONARY STANDARDS ONLY. I'm not group bashing in any way) to like the same sex for sexual purposes. MILLIONS OF YEARS OF CREATION OF GENERATIONS UPON GENERATIONS prove everyone in this post wrong, who side with the belief that it's correct to be gay bi-sesual, or trans BY EVOLUTIONARY STANDARDS NOT SOCIETY. Those that are trans, bi-sexual, or gay ALL OF YOU posting, 100% of you were born through a MALE SPERM fertilizing a FEMALE EGG, the way it has been done for MILLIONS OF YEARS AND WITH 100s OF MILLIONS OF DIFFERENT Species.

You guys have to quit arguing with emotion and argue with facts. Pay attention to other things other than just human beings. Why is it the animals reproduce without any instruction or dictation that tells them otherwise? The bi-product of higher intelligence is being too intelligent. This is a direct shot at the "Gays can reproduce through fertilization. And medicals are finding ways to make it so men can have wombs." Are you really serious? This is absurd. You guys are pinning intelligence where only natural instinct should be. Just because we are smart enough to put a penis on a woman DOESN'T MAKE IT RIGHT. Again, just a bi-product of intelligence.....because we can do it, it's right....WRONG! From this way of thought, SERIAL KILLERS are okay. They have the ability to kill mercilessly so it's OK? This comment proves me so right. Why has the great white shark continued to reproduce and continue its species for over 50 million years? Why aren't there gay sharks? Or gay animals in general? Two reason. 1. Because THEIR SPECIES WOULDN'T CONTINUE TO FLOURISH and 2 Because sharks aren't as smart (dumb) as humans to try to reproduce by other means. So intelligent that people actually think that by EVOLUTIONARY STANDARDS it is okay to be gay trans, or bi-sexual. It is not okay because we humans and animals and plants and fungi are here to reproduce. Gays can't reproduce....naturally, the way nature intended, not smart-assed human beings.

The argument is that trans, gay or bi-sexuality is wrong, by evolutionary standards ONLY. Anything that stops gay hinders (bi-sexuality), or poses a threat (transgender) may be deemed detrimental to life which is one of the points of life which is to CREATE MORE LIFE. Just the same as runt pigs, retardation, deformities, abnormalities in chemical levels, etc. Sorry but it is true. Does this mean that I don't like you? Or hate you? Or dislike your way of doing things? FUUUCK NO! I love all people, that includes you but that doesn't mean that I don't love the truth.

@Smokescreened84 By actuality, You are totality right, you are not wrong. And before I say what I am certain will make you very angry as well as others, I have no problems with gays, trans, or bisexuals of any sort or fashion. Do what you feel is right and what you love. More power to you. Now the make you angry part....by EVOLUTIONARY STANDARDS you are wrong (as in your existence). Please before you get mad and not continue on, let me explain why you are wrong. It is safe to say that the END meaning of life is unknown. Agreed? But as life as we no it today and in the near future ONE of the purposes of life is to create MORE LIFE. This cannot be denied. In the furtherence of a species, those things that hinder, stop, or pose a threat to the continuation of life may be deemed as wrong. Now this next part will tickle you a bit....Trans, gay or bi-sexual is wrong simply because you CANNOT create (hinders or poses a threat) another trans, gay or bi-sexual person with two people of THE SAME SEX!!!! So you say "So what? It isn't meant to be that way. When we are born we are here." But that is not my argument.

I just looked up the definition of "transgender" and it basically means that a person is confused and chooses to confuse others about his/her sexual orientation.