rubbageman's comments

Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yes, this is a great game a a great new IP.

Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rubbageman

@TBear7130 you did not play it did you?


Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This review is completely off. But here is where the reviewer went astray. Arkham Asylum was the first largely successful licensed Batman game. So for Arkham City they continued the model. Now you have a new studio working on this franchise that made a mark in the genre. Why go and change the whole thing.

Yes the same mechanics are there, as with most successful franchise. This game delivers the audience into the "origins" of the hero. Things should not be as easy as they were in the other two. This is an earlier, less experienced Dark Knight and In my opinion does the series a solid.


9/10


Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well said. People who attack others for a difference in opinion has no idea what freedom of the press means.

Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Nice. Microsoft took 21.6 billion in profit and did something with it. with assets Nokia has over 28 billion in potential value.


Avatar image for rubbageman
rubbageman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rubbageman

@togan008 @Gothic-360 @DoomZaW wrong Microsoft made 21.6 billion in profit compared to sony who made 458 million. Sorry son.