A Beautiful trailer for a Beautiful game, Looking at a Sony studio managing to make games like this just shows that any fine line in quality of next-gen will equal Sony's outright dominance #LLK
@CrossFire312 @Arda_Daghan212 I agree with both of you on the character introduction front - And as much as I'd love to see CJ in the game, I doubt he would as SA was set 20 years ago & with him already being between 20-30 , That would lead him to being 40-50 years old
@flesh19no Well, Thats certainly some interesting ideas....but if you changed all them , would it really be a GTA game anymore?Also, Just to point out, You go on ranting why the game isn't realistic & should be made more, then you go and end on the very opposite :S
Rockstar once again showing they will show more when & how they want...which is brilliant , as even with these photo's it seems to bring out the brilliance of GTA - Can any other developer really create so much discussion over 3 photo's & yet they are all iconic with the memorable bicycles from GTA:SA (Also if you noticed, Its a mountain bike which could lead to the possiblity of multiple types , if you remember the BMX from SA), Return of planes (Also with obvious possibilities for multiple types, also leading to the grand scale the game will be) & last of all , the return of the once favoured Cheetah...
Looking at this i've got to say this my most anticipated for game in a while , if not ever - Well Done Rockstar!!
Screw This - By cutting out the physical market they're losing money and making only problems for the consumer
Looking on the PS Store, games on there are generally released a while after the standard physical release date and come at an increased price so thats the only reason they are doing this, but if people make it clear that this money grabbing scheme isn't going to happen, they will have to stop and think things through.
And yeah, Thats without even considering the "Internet Connection" debate
With a subject like this, I think its just peoples perception & take upon it. I love Medal of Honour, I always have, and I (probably) always will so this it might seem i have a biased outlook on it, but I don't think I do.
With this, people (and of course Tom Mcshea) people are mis-interpreting with is being said - The game is not being marketed as being realistic wholly, its being marketed as something which has realistic pieces in the overall puzzle, but not completely.
The Tom guy is an utter moron for thinking a game shouldn't be "fun" because at the end of the day, Human beings will do things that make them feel good which in this case means enjoying "fun" things - You are not going to pay for ( and most importantly , Play) something that isn't fun.
Both sides on this have fair points with Greg obivously making the truthful points correct, but Tom has points which would be correct, Just not in this manner where they are marketing something which they are backing.
pieham's comments