@horizonwriter: point is i wouldn't of called the original Zelda open world. Was still fairly linear in ways of progression (items to progress etc). Whereas Elite, being a game of that time which was open world. LTTP or WW probably hits that more, but again needed items to progress through certain elements.

So the answer is no- i didnt forget. I was merely replying to a comment.

@rushiosan: and Elite was open world before that - whats your point ?

soooo..... Nintendo's take on The Witcher 3 ?

Gutted that I binned my Wii U about a year ago

underwhelming :(

@rayo_theking: was a button hold down- not a masher ha - even easier!! Bloody useless combat

well this was worth the click hahaha

@Mon6ana: Didnt they give it a 6.5 ?

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/dantes-inferno-review/1900-6249721/

@domiddian: arent there guys who do speed runs with no armour / naked? I watched one- and afraid that @Daelusca was right - lots of rolling.

@aross2004: It was a combo of storytelling, characters and gameplay as to why people didn't really tune into it.

Best quote about the gameplay:

"Depth is a system that allows you to capitalize on your understanding of your party and your enemy down to the individual spell cast, not a system that restricts you to the same level of precision as the darkness knob on your toaster."