Keep in mind this is a man who has 50 guns in his home. Warning signs? Can we get the ATF to look into this?

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"] you a Christian? what sect?

LJS9502_basic

Lol LJ being willfully ignorant for the upteenth time

Are you aware of What Thursday means?

Followers of Alex Jones are mostly intellectually inept people who gravitate towards nonsense for the sense of superiority it provides them through the delusion of knowing something that the rest of society is too stupid to see.

did they seize vast stockpiles of tinsel and coloured lights? Those bastards could have brought joy to thousands, Thank Allah they were thwarted.

What i'm sick of is Christians trying to claim exclusive rights to a holiday they never created. It's a holiday for everyone and everyone has the right to celebrate it and should not feel like they have to be part of some group in order to do so.

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

[QUOTE="ShuLordLiuPei"] Arguable.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

infringedpast participle, past tense ofin·fringe(Verb):Act so as to limit or undermine.

Limiting assault rifles could be considered an infringement. Playing Devil's Advocate here.

dercoo

Only if you take an extreme absolute view of "Infringement". People's right's are already being infringed, You don't have the right to carry a loader assault rifle into a bank or sports stadium, Is that not infringing on their right to keep and bear arms?

The point of the second amendment was in reference to a Militia, People who were part of a militia were expected to keep and equip themselves with their own weapons. The modern version of a Militia is the National Guard, They have all the equipment necessary to provide the security to ensure a free state. By having a standing National Guard properly equipped to resist Tyranny renders the need for civilians to keep and bear arms void.

The Supreme Court disagrees with you.

That can hardly be considered definitive.

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]There's no constitutionally guaranteed right to an assault rifle. ShuLordLiuPei

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

infringedpast participle, past tense ofin·fringe(Verb):Act so as to limit or undermine.

Limiting assault rifles could be considered an infringement. Playing Devil's Advocate here.

Only if you take an extreme absolute view of "Infringement". People's right's are already being infringed, You don't have the right to carry a loader assault rifle into a bank or sports stadium, Is that not infringing on their right to keep and bear arms?

The point of the second amendment was in reference to a Militia, People who were part of a militia were expected to keep and equip themselves with their own weapons. The modern version of a Militia is the National Guard, They have all the equipment necessary to provide the security to ensure a free state. By having a standing National Guard properly equipped to resist Tyranny renders the need for civilians to keep and bear arms void.

Words seem to have no effect so I am going to post a picture :roll:

no-scope-AK47

Many people die in gun related accidents, The majority of gun related deaths are suicides.

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"]

The US has taken part in Guerrilla fighting since its inception, that naton is one of the world's strongest advocates of the laws of land warfare.

thegerg

In this Hypothetical we must assume certain ideological changes in the US regime as well as the socio-economic state of the nation. For the situation to become one of armed insurrection by the people we must assume things have taken a turn for the extreme.

i don't think digging too deep into this hypothetical will be in anyway productive so i'll just leave it here.

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] NATO knows this already. This is why advanced situational awareness training is now part of the mandatory theater entry requirements. "While you're at it let them know the solution to IED's is to avoid setting them off." Again, this is already known. To act as if there aren't steps that can be taken to mitigate these types of events, or to get hostile with other posters who recognize that there are, is childish. I have quite a bit of useful advice.thegerg

Please offer more, I do enjoy platitudes.

You "advice" reminds me of this video

ONN