While I don't think a Tarantino-directed Star Trek film would be the end of the world or the franchise as some have suggested, I definitely don't think he's a good fit for the series.
@kgbkgb: Well, whatever the case, I liked Link to the Past a hell of a lot more. I think there's a hell of a lot of corruption and bias in game reviewing, similar to the mainstream media. I thought Horizon Zero Dawn was a far superior open-world game. I respect your right to like Breath of the Wild, so you should respect my right to dislike it instead of acting like your biased opinion is divine truth.
I liked the WonderSwan Color remake of the original SaGa and the DS ones of SaGa 2 and 3, but I tend to find severe balance issues in games of this franchise, so I'll pass on them.
Meh, I don't really care much for the Ghostbusters and consider their work sacrilegious, since they basically declare war on the afterlife. I sure as hell wouldn't want to call them if the spirit of one of my deceased grandparents materialized in my home.
Meh, I wasn't much of a fan of Breath of the Wild since I feel I've played better Zeldas and open-world games; had it been my first Switch game instead of Super Mario Odyssey, I would've been downright furious. I more hyped about the forthcoming remake of Link's Awakening.
I could care less about Cuphead. Being top of the class in art and music is reason to buy an artbook or soundtrack, not a game. I feel conned into purchasing it, and don't understand why people always gush over unnecessarily-hard games like it to be "rewarding," other than for bragging rights. If a game rewarded you with an awesome story, that would be rewarding for me.
I don't think loot boxes are any different from buying booster packs of trading card games like Magic: The Gathering, and politicians certainly aren't qualified to make decisions regarding them.
KingOdin11's comments