kenundrum7's comments

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@crimsonmar: I suggest you educate yourself, as you are looking like a fool.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@crimsonmar: Everyone is responsible for their own health. Doctors can help, but are opinionated people, sometimes with god complexes, and make mistakes all the time.

But that was a side point. Your analogy was terrible. And your ability to grasp the difference between objective and subjective is horrible.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@crimsonmar: Would you consider "bad controls" an objective fact for this game?

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@fedor: Terrible analogy it was. Difference between science and entertainment. Not comparable.

Even though it was a bad analogy, a person need to educate themselves on their medical condition, and not depend solely on a doctors orders. They have been wrong before, and push drugs more then they should.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@crimsonmar: There is no exact formula for "fun", or "enjoyable". It is up to the individual. Taking all subjective elements out makes it impossible to score a game for entertainment value. For both "great critics" or average people, there is no such thing as totally objective for any type of entertainment. That is your delusion. This is not science. This is entertainment: Therefore subjective no matter who scores it.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@crimsonmar: Because 9 is a bad score? Good gravy! What is wrong with people?

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@waypastcrazy: You can't be disappointed, or crimsonmar may start crying. To crimsonmar, whether a game is fun or not is entirely subjective. Therefore all reviews have subjective elements. Because "most" people think something is fun does not mean all people will. Your "only facts matter"s bull stew is delusional.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@justthetip: But if it didn't get a ten I cannot like it. :)

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@Arkhalipso: But still, the PC version came out 5 months after the current gen version as well.

Avatar image for kenundrum7
kenundrum7

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

@rotchild: I agree 100% with rotchild, and OldDadGamer here. I do not have this game, but from what I have seen, I do not seem to care to want to get it. That kind of surprises me, as I loved the first one. I tried to watch someone play it yesterday, thinking it would change my mind. Nope. Made it worse. Dull and boring. I couldn't watch it very long. Maybe it was because he was playing the early part, I don't know, but it didn't draw me in. That is for sure.

Seeing the reviewer talk about the need to balance your food intake soured me right away. I play games to get away from the tedium of real life. I do not want that tedium simulated in a game like this. I mean I love eating, but it is not like you can taste the food in this game, or that it gives you a dopamine dose for your brain, so it becomes a chore.

I also agree with different strokes for different folks. Some may love that type of thing. Also I may like this game if I give it a try, but it is not pulling me to want to try.