The're running to be your president not your spouse.

It really doesn't matter if you don't know alot about them,

because there policies will change the country, not there personalities.

If you don't know who to vote for, look at there policies and vote for which you agree with the most/

I recently read an article on IGN (Boo Hiss) Speculatuing what the next iteration of links travel will be like after miyamoto says the series needs change.

Being a diehard Zelda fan, i dismissed most of it, but the question is; do you think that the series and style needs tweakin?

Here's the link to the article

Having spent ALOT of time in both countries, i find that the us British drink it a hell of alot more than Americans.

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="Netherscourge"]

The only people who care about this are the people who are already comitted to voting for McCain...

The_Mac_Daddy

Not true. A poll came out today saying that a third of independents say the ayers link will make them less likely to vote for obama..

What poll?

Hello?

I'd really like to see that poll, I looked but couldn't find it.

I'm not trying to start a political argument either, I genuinely want to see the poll.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/10/fox-news-poll-candidates-character/

LOL, It's Fox

"High-tech tools of war: U.S. military technology is more than a decade ahead of every other country's and is advancing so quickly that the rest of the world's forces might never catch up"

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_9_19/ai_100111687

The_Mac_Daddy

written in 2003

and surprise, surpise by an American

[QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"]

If America tried to Invade the UK, America would get absoloutly PWNT, If the UK tried to invade America, America would Dice the UK.

It truly depends on the situation of conflict you're talking about.

IMO britain has better trained troops

The_Mac_Daddy

If America really wanted to, they could drop the big bombs on the UK and send the entire island underwater...

That wouldn't be invading, would it:roll:

Ok, let me throw around some numbers:

UK active military persnonnel: 195,900

Available for military service: 14,607,724

Spend 33.6 billion on military.

USA active military personnel: 1,436,642 (That's about 7 U.S. soldiers for every 1 UK soldier. And these are highly trained soldiers.. not Iraqi insurgents..)

Available for military service: 72,715,332 (About 5 per every 1 UK citizen)

Spend 583 billion on military. (About 17.5 TIMES MORE than the UK military)

I'm pretty convinced the US wouldn't have too much of a problem if they invaded the UK.. with neither country having any help.

I'm sure you had better numbers for invading Vietnam, and still got dicked on.

How many wars has America won without the help of another country? Remind me please, i can't remember any.

First of all, Vietnam was completetly different. Not to mention, the war for the US started in 1965. This is 43 years later.

The U.S had better numbers for that war.

It just goes to show, quality over quantity.

But that's what I'm getting at. It's 43 years later.. the US military is at a much higher quality than it was back then. Not to mention, NO, the US did NOT have better numbers for that war. Only 500,000 or so were there. Right now we have 1.4 million on active duty.

The U.S sent in 553,000, and in terms of allies you had far more men.

What i'm saying is, that with the quality that our guys have been trained with wand with the knowledge of land (like the vietcong had) we would win if you tried to invade.

But if we tried to invade you it would be vice cersa.

I know that the U.S has a bigger budget, More men, more Bombs and so on, but i seriously doubt that you could win an invasion with us

[QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"]

If America tried to Invade the UK, America would get absoloutly PWNT,

SIapshot

I can assure you it wouldn't.

I can assure you they would).

If you couldn't handle Vietnam there's no way you can handle us.

If you want a water fight, we would win that too.

I've already said that if Britain try to invade America they would be diced. then i will add hung and quarted.

However if America tried to invade britain, you would be wiped out.

And gun crime over here is rising quickly, you'd be surprised how easy it is to get hands on arms, if you know what i mean :P

[QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"][QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"][QUOTE="joshi1s3"]

If America tried to Invade the UK, America would get absoloutly PWNT, If the UK tried to invade America, America would Dice the UK.

It truly depends on the situation of conflict you're talking about.

IMO britain has better trained troops

The_Mac_Daddy

If America really wanted to, they could drop the big bombs on the UK and send the entire island underwater...

That wouldn't be invading, would it:roll:

Ok, let me throw around some numbers:

UK active military persnonnel: 195,900

Available for military service: 14,607,724

Spend 33.6 billion on military.

USA active military personnel: 1,436,642 (That's about 7 U.S. soldiers for every 1 UK soldier. And these are highly trained soldiers.. not Iraqi insurgents..)

Available for military service: 72,715,332 (About 5 per every 1 UK citizen)

Spend 583 billion on military. (About 17.5 TIMES MORE than the UK military)

I'm pretty convinced the US wouldn't have too much of a problem if they invaded the UK.. with neither country having any help.

I'm sure you had better numbers for invading Vietnam, and still got dicked on.

How many wars has America won without the help of another country? Remind me please, i can't remember any.

First of all, Vietnam was completetly different. Not to mention, the war for the US started in 1965. This is 43 years later.

The U.S had better numbers for that war.

It just goes to show, quality over quantity.