there is no right way to play...ppl cry when they get owned...who cares..play how you want...if you camp on me..you get 1 maybe 2 kills on me then i will kill you...i run n gun every map no matter what weapon i am using...i have gone 45-8 on hijacked to 4-20 who GAF...this game (whole franchise) is getting so dumbed down to the point it will come down to connection only..wont matter if you shottie someone point blank against a guy with a BB gun...if your connection is slower..you lose..the more ppl complain about stuff the more they take away to try to comp it...they nerfed the one pistols on mw3...but left the type 95 alone...they pretty much made QSn a thing of the past (MW2) even tho QSn was harder to get good at than most realize...no matter how you play ppl will critisize unless you are just average at like 15-8..dont matter

here is what you could do...become friends with someone who really sucks...has like under a 1.0 K/D and under a 150 SCP...and when he is playing join his lobby (dont join each other cuz then it dont work as good)....this game has that stupid skill matcthmaking lobby whatever...I have this dude from work I play with once in a while and I average like 30+-5 most the time cuz his lobbies he gets to play in are garbage and it is fun for a while...I dont do it all day only when he is on...most other times I have to play with ppl that have a 1.8-2.0+ K/D and over 300 SCP...and then I'm only getting like 15-20 kills and deaths are up n down..

a good way to tell is go to lobby leaderboards and if they only have a few hundred or even a couple thousands kills/deaths...then they most likely did the glitch...I have seen quite a few ppl with like 50 kills and whatever deaths...so then you should report them ppl...I have only seen about 2-3 real prestiege master and they had like over 10,000 kills and that is just the one game mode we were playing in they most likely got the rest in other game modes to already be prestiege 10...

FYI in case some people didnt know...people who do the mirror glitch take on the stats of whoever gave them the master level gametag...so if you look at their combat record it will show like 30,000 kills and even the play time...so you have to look in the lobby leaderboards..or search them on COD Elite if you have it..

either way I laugh at anyone that is prestiege masters already...if you did it legit...get a girl...if you cheated...get a life loser..

[QUOTE="jJaAmMeEsS2184"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] You think India and China haven't changed in years? You seem to be very confused. Do you have any refrence to support your claim that oil is the biggest expense in the war on terror? It is quite clear that you have no clue about what you are talking. thegerg

LOL you seem to be confused if you dont think oil is the biggest expense to the war it is by far the largest expense...are you kidding me? And ok I'll give you your argument that china and india are a little more how do I put it.."in demand" of oil...but they have been trying to do it for years..but all of a sudden oil prices skyrocket after the war(s) began?? come on get with the program people..it takes an incredible amount of oil/gas to run a war in two-three separate countries over a 10+ year stint or do you think they are all driving priuses to the battle? no they are like 5-10 mpg tanks(if that even) and maybe 15 mpg hummers...and that doesnt even include the 100's of sorties flown daily....you have no idea how much they use over there...it would shock you..and if you want a reference his name is Dan Henderson 4 star general (ret.) U.S. Army..I know him personally..

"I do know how much they know over ther" WTF?? are you talking about...whatever...all the things you list like maintenance and all that stuff...EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING takes petroleum...I'm done arguing with people who have no clue as to what I am saying...it is plain and simple...

LOL besides this is so far off topic I'd be surprised this aint locked before I'm finished typing this

[QUOTE="jJaAmMeEsS2184"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] You think India and China haven't changed in years? You seem to be very confused. Do you have any refrence to support your claim that oil is the biggest expense in the war on terror? It is quite clear that you have no clue about what you are talking. Person0

LOL you seem to be confused if you dont think oil is the biggest expense to the war it is by far the largest expense...are you kidding me? And ok I'll give you your argument that china and india are a little more how do I put it.."in demand" of oil...but they have been trying to do it for years..but all of a sudden oil prices skyrocket after the war(s) began?? come on get with the program people..it takes an incredible amount of oil/gas to run a war in two-three separate countries over a 10+ year stint or do you think they are all driving priuses to the battle? no they are like 5-10 mpg tanks(if that even) and maybe 15 mpg hummers...and that doesnt even include the 100's of sorties flown daily....you have no idea how much they use over there...it would shock you..and if you want a reference his name is Dan Henderson 4 star general (ret.) U.S. Army..I know him personally..

thanks..that would be ONLY the Department of Defense...and 2008 wow gas was over a dollar cheaper back then...the department of defense is not the whole of the US military..sorry bro...and even so 16 billion yes thats a b not an m...that just justifies my point even more..thanks...

THE HUNTER...lol I said it...nahh I actually like big game hunter myself...not as much as arcade but still better than console..

[QUOTE="jJaAmMeEsS2184"]

I love seeing people misdirected ^^^^^^ THE US GOVERNMENT DOES IN FACT CONTROL/INFLUENCE GAS PRICES...get your heads outta the gutter people...China and India are in fact driving oil prices up...however they have been doing that for years now and it really is not that significant...and all of a sudden just like that oil prices are skyrocketing??? them two countries havnt changed in years...what has changed?? oh this new war on terrorism...what is the biggest expense to that cause?? of course it is oil...and who is the front runner on the war on terrorism??? that would be the United States of America...dragging down our economy with high oil prices to support an unwinnable war...that is why they dodge the question, because niether one has a solid solution for getting our troops outta the war...

thegerg

LOL you seem to be confused if you dont think oil is the biggest expense to the war it is by far the largest expense...are you kidding me? And ok I'll give you your argument that china and india are a little more how do I put it.."in demand" of oil...but they have been trying to do it for years..but all of a sudden oil prices skyrocket after the war(s) began?? come on get with the program people..it takes an incredible amount of oil/gas to run a war in two-three separate countries over a 10+ year stint or do you think they are all driving priuses to the battle? no they are like 5-10 mpg tanks(if that even) and maybe 15 mpg hummers...and that doesnt even include the 100's of sorties flown daily....you have no idea how much they use over there...it would shock you..and if you want a reference his name is Dan Henderson 4 star general (ret.) U.S. Army..I know him personally..

I love seeing people misdirected ^^^^^^ THE US GOVERNMENT DOES IN FACT CONTROL/INFLUENCE GAS PRICES...get your heads outta the gutter people...China and India are in fact driving oil prices up...however they have been doing that for years now and it really is not that significant...and all of a sudden just like that oil prices are skyrocketing??? them two countries havnt changed in years...what has changed?? oh this new war on terrorism...what is the biggest expense to that cause?? of course it is oil...and who is the front runner on the war on terrorism??? that would be the United States of America...dragging down our economy with high oil prices to support an unwinnable war...that is why they dodge the question, because niether one has a solid solution for getting our troops outta the war...

I'm an economics major thinking about picking up a double major in accounting. At my university accounting majors have the highest employment rate immediately after graduation. I think it would be a good safety net to have in the current job market. I've taken both financial and managerial accounting already. What is life like as an accountant? Is it as boring of a career as the stereotype portrays? Are you forced into going into public accounting and getting a CPA right after graduating or are there many opportunities to work for a private firm right away? Is working for the big four as miserable as it sounds? Any input on accounting is welcome. Thx!Vuurk

my wife is an accountant...4 yr. degree..about 7 yrs. exp. she actually likes it...she handles all of her companies financial stuff...I myself am a construction worker so I have no clue when she tells me exactly what she does...but she makes around 45-50 grand a year and she has potential to make more next year with extra programs her work offers for an added bonus...also if you look at job searches it seems accountants are in very high demand..(at least the state I live in)..

[QUOTE="jJaAmMeEsS2184"]

never voted in my life and probably wont be running to the voting station any time soon....as soon as we get a candidate that DOES NOT dodge the gas price issue and tell us they will lower them...then perhaps I may vote for him/her...

jim_shorts

then why is it a topic in the presidential debates? and why do both of them dodge the question? and why are gas prices going down a couple of weeks before the election? I do know that the growing global economy and increase in demand has a lot to do with gas prices but c'mon they went from a dollar something to almost 3 bucks litterally over night after 9/11...