ixSasquatchxx's forum posts

  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

I agree with a new Battlefront but only for the consoles not the stupid psp ones. And how about Republic Commando 2?

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
I did not enjoy the beta.I was excited for the game but after playing the beta I went straight to Gamestop and switched to MW3.Its not because I was bad at it, I was rather good at the game, It just wasnt what I expected after 3 years in development.Do people really think they can fix the problems by the time the game comes out, I dont think they can.mrsniper83
Exactly. On the beta it says we want your feed back to help us improve it. How can they fix everything literally like 3 weeks before the game even comes out? It had many errors and I expect those errors to be in the actual game. Need I point out Bad Co 2? The beta had many errors and so did the actual game. And I have heard many people say theres a difference between the Bad Co and Battlefield. Really? Cuz last I looked the title was BATTLEFIELD Bad Company. Emphasis on the battlefield part. Bad Co had big maps to with vehicle warfare. So really the argument that Bad Co isnt a true battlefield game is bunk.
Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

I had fun the very 1st match I played in. Guns felt good. Recoil was great. Knifing was fine.

Then I realized:

1- There was no way I could stay in a squad with my bro or my friends. Matchmaking was terrible.

2- My mike wasn't working even though it was on. I was talking my @#$ off for 10 minutes until I realized no one could hear me. doh!

3- Prone campers everywhere doing nothing concerning the objectives. Very CoD-like.

4- Idiot teammates running around with flashlights (why are you looking my way?)

5- Bugs and visual glitches( I expected them but the amount I came across was ridiculous!)

6- High level dudes(level 30+) spawn camping (This happened frequently in BFBC1 and BFBC2)

7- Zero teamwork. Everyone I played with was a run n gun rambo. No spotting, dropping ammo, etc. It seemed like I was the only one planting and defusing. I got the ace pin just by healing and reviving.

Stealin-Shadows

Same here. And dont forget about shooting someone multiple times and they dont die, and the recoil i thought was terrible. It recoiled so much you couldnt hit anyone and if you did bursts it injured them and then they shot you.

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

Probably won't be getting day 1 since this plays like a copy and pasta job of Bad Company 2 and to me that isn't a real Battlefield game. Granted the maps weren't th best but still Rush shouldn't be in a normal Battlefield title at all. Also for the love of god they make on their promise and fix the damn SMG's as the UMP-45 was just a joke in the beta same as the PP-2000 with a red dot.

Honestly I could really see myself just playing the back to karland maps since those are great BF maps and Wake Island never ever gets old no matter if its 1942, Vietnam, BF2 or 2142.

xXDrPainXx
I agree with you. The gameplay didnt feel any different than Bad Co. 2's.
Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

You can enjoy both games, but that doesn't mean you can't critisize the developers. MW3 is going to be fun, but you can't deny that this is a complete profit generator. Sequels are supposed to be similar (if the original was good), and I think alot of gaming companies are learning from the Halo3 -> Reach transition. However it's completely clear that MW3 doesn't qualify as a sequel. It's insulting how little is changing with this game and selling for the price of a sequel (heard rumors it might even be $70).

The fact is, Tryarch and Infinity Ward are using the "Madden tactic". NFL Madden games have a new iteration every year, with basically the exact same game. However, they can do this because THE GOD DAMN LEAGUE CHANGES! There is no significant factor that requires MW3 to be released other than overstaffing of the developer companies.

SenorPickle
Last I looked MW3 is continuing and picking up where MW2 left off. Doesnt that qualify it as a sequel?
Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

No, it was horrible. Bad Co 2's beta was horrible and I bought it anyway. I hated Bad Co 2 so now that I know that BF3 beta sucks im not buying the actual game.

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="ixSasquatchxx"]

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

EPIC FAIL

HilbillyRokstar

Really, then where are the JETS? I missed the JETS in BC2, where were they? LOL. No Battlefield 3 is not Bad Company 3. Wrong answer, please try again.

I actually said same GAMEPLAY with a few new features. I do believe jets would go under that catagory. But its ok not everyone can read correctly.

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

Bad Co 2 problem: Everyone snipes, it takes 20 shots to kill someone, shotguns have an insane amount of reach, you can shoot someone first and they turn around and kill you somehow, rockets and grenade launchers dont kill anyone unless you direct impact them, and so on.

Avatar image for ixSasquatchxx
ixSasquatchxx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ixSasquatchxx
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

I realize that betas have many errors however I remember when the Bad Co. 2 beta came out. The beta for it was just as terrible as the real game.

  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3