hercule5's forum posts

Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts

My point has not been limited to xp. So when I gave my link, it was simply to show that a 32bit OS, vista with sp1 in this case, can show all the physical memory installed. Quit turning it around into your argument, and quit bringing up xp and lower. You aren't staying on point.

And your second pic doesnt have SP1 installed. So I don't see how it's relevent now.

Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts

I read the whole page and understand what it all means. While you went on saying how the video card affects blah blah blah, my point has been how much ram shows up in system properties. Never have I disputed how much is used for jack, only how much is shown to exist.

Try going back and reading my other posts instead of making me retype everything I have already said.

Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
read my edit. "After you install Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1), the memory (RAM) value reported by Windows Vista may increase if the following conditions are true: * The system BIOS has reserved physical memory for graphics or for other peripherals. * Your computer has more than 3 GB of system memory installed. This change occurs because Windows Vista with SP1 reports how much physical memory installed on your computer.
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
It's a 32bit OS, it states it shows how much physical ram is installed. I never made mention about how 4GB should up as 4GB on a 32bit vista, since I have yet to do so. Your point has been that the video card affects how much is shown to exist, so if anything, it shows that you are wrong. My point about different motherboards was that the amount might differ from board to board.
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
I must say it's odd that those work, while titan quest does not.
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
[QUOTE="opamando"]

[QUOTE="hercule5"]I understand better now what you were saying, but I fail to see how memory is allocated to devices and subtracted from total system memory but only with >4GB installed. I would imagine it to apply no matter how much memory is installed. Not that I disagree with the facts, but I would imagine you can follow my logic there. I wasn't giving inaccurate information. When the system memory differs with 2 different motherboards, you come to a conclusion, and that is a fact, based on experience. Bebi_vegeta

OK, I am not saying that with different mobos it will always be the same. But there is a chance if you have 2 different mobos, both with 4GB of RAM , they will see the same amount of RAM in a 32-bit OS.

But I can guarantee you, that if you have 2 identical or different motherboard, and one has a 256MB GPU and the other has a 512MB GPU, the one with the 512 will see less of the 4GB, than the one with 256.

Your experiences are not wrong, just incomplete. If you would have read those links you would have read how the mobos do affect, but the differences will be quite minor from one board to the next. While the GPU will depends on the different sizes of VRAM.

The inaccurate information you were giving was that GPU has nothing to do with it, and that our explanations had nothing to do with it. I understand it is sorta confusing. That is why the web is full of people asking where is the rest of their 4GB of RAM.

I've read the Os Vista 32bit with SP1 can see 4Gb... but, I cannort confirme that. But of cours, can't use all of the 4Gb.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946003

"After you install Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1), the memory (RAM) value reported by Windows Vista may increase if the following conditions are true:

* The system BIOS has reserved physical memory for graphics or for other peripherals.

* Your computer has more than 3 GB of system memory installed.

This change occurs because Windows Vista with SP1 reports how much physical memory installed on your computer. All versions of Windows NT-based operating systems before Windows Vista Service SP1 report how much memory available to the operating system. This change in Windows Vista SP1 is a reporting change only."

I believe this proves my point.

Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
I understand better now what you were saying, but I fail to see how memory is allocated to devices and subtracted from total system memory but only with >4GB installed. I would imagine it to apply no matter how much memory is installed. Not that I disagree with the facts, but I would imagine you can follow my logic there. I wasn't giving inaccurate information. When the system memory differs with 2 different motherboards, you come to a conclusion, and that is a fact, based on experience.
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
More than what you're saying. If I can give examples based on experience, it's better than possibly misinterpreting what is fact, or saying "The video cards does add to the total amouth of memory it will see..."
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
I wasn't debating the fact that memory is indeed allocated the the video card. I was debating whether or not it would affect what shows in system properties. Who gave facts on that?
Avatar image for hercule5
hercule5

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 hercule5
Member since 2004 • 64 Posts
To me, my experience would be worth more to me, just as yours would be worth more to you. The past experiences are to show you what drives me. What drives me to doubt people. I didn't mean for it to be relevent, not meant to debate. As for the math, I saw that already. I thought you were looking for a explanation in words. I once argued with some guy on another forum about a problem someone was having that I gave a working solution to. This guy sounded rather knowledgeable, more so that me. Despite the fact that he claimed the solution I gave should have done nothing, he couldn't explain to me why it worked. - again, past, but just to show you it's worth arguing a point if you know what works.