genfactor's forum posts

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

I guess if you want to point out the obvious then yes. However, the main claim that Nintendo couldn't go 3rd party was because their games were designed around their hardware ideas. If their hardware is the same as everyone else's then there's no reason you can't see splatoon 2 on PS5 or Zelda on XB2. I guess since the libraries of PS4 and XB1 are greater than 95% identical, I can drop one of them instead since I don't need 3 machines that do the same thing.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

@Allicrombie said:

@NathanDrakeSwag: at least in a Trump vs Hillary general election, there are clear choices. There are no similar policies or ideological crossovers or anything like that; there would be clearly drawn lines, where voters know exactly who and what they are getting.

I'm pretty confident the media or the side with the least palatable message will find a way to claim that both sides are the same.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

New systems usually take more than a year to develop a quality software library. There are quite a few games that you could be playing right now while you're waiting for games for this "NX" that we know nothing about.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

The Wii U had a lot of un-realized potential. Playing some of the indie games on the eshop that make creative use of the gamepad is proof of that.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

I hope the rumors about NX are true. If that's the case, then I see no reason why we can't get a open world Pokemon MMO that works across the portable, mobile and console versions.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Bigboi500 said:
@emgesp said:

No, they need to start building up hype ASAP if the NX is coming out this year.

Wrong, because no matter what they do, short of being exactly like Sony or Microsoft, people like you will complain no matter what.

You're right, if Nintendo was more like Sony/Microsoft I'd be way more happy. That means it would have great third party support, solid online, hardware not a generation behind and of course all their great 1st party output. Who wouldn't want that from Nintendo?

No. I have my Sony/Microsoft devices to have my Sony/Microsoft experiences. I own Nintendo devices for non Sony/Microsoft experiences. After the 1st two years, the Wii U moved ahead of my 360 to being my favorite console. With uncharted 4, FF7, Persona 5, KH3 and Tekken 7 being released for PS4, I'm expecting that to change, but they're not released yet.

If a third identical machine gets released to market with the only difference being a Nintendo brand name, then I won't buy it. I already have two machines like that named PS4 and XB1.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

@dave123321:

"What goes around comes around" does not matter anymore. The only thing that will change is that an elected Democratic majority will be able to govern like they were elected to do. Because Democrats don't pull this shit to this degree when they're in the minority, I don't expect there to be any changes in how Republicans get their nominees confirmed.

Senator Grassley made the threat of a Scalia clone army if the rules change as if the first Scalia was blocked by filibuster... what a joke.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

The U.S. should engage in deficit spending during recessions to jumpstart the economy and to insulate the country from further economic harm like decrease in competitiveness or increases in poverty.

The U.S. should pay down it's debt during good economic times. During the last decade up to now, we've been doing it backwards.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

[QUOTE="genfactor"][QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

Obamacare means Americans are forced to purchase health insurance (more expensive than normal) or pay thousands of dollars in fines.

It is not "free healthcare" by any stretch.

And you still get like a $14,000 deductable, meaning if the hospital hands you a $14,000 bill, it's your responsibility to pay it, beyond that, your catastrophic coverage kicks in.

If you don't pay for health insurance or the fine, they take it out of your bank account.

If you don't have enough to pay, they put a lien on your house.

There would be a mass revolt against Obamacare, except most Americans are ignorant about their finances.

LazySloth718

None of that is true but there are people who beleive it is, and THAT is the biggest problem with Obamacare. THAT is the reason why a majority of Americans are against Obamacare but a majority of Americans are in favor of the ACA even though they are the same exact thing.

https://www.healthcare.gov/what-if-someone-doesnt-have-health-coverage-in-2014/

1. Everyone must get insurance or pay a "fine" which starts at %1 in 2014 and goes to %2.5 in 2016

2. The "fine" is handled by the IRS (it's a tax)

3. The IRS can loot your bank account for unpaid monies

4. The IRS can put a lien on your house for unpaid monies

5. Everybody, at every income level, will either have to buy something or pay something.

A person earning $10,000 a year will be responsible for paying %2 (about $200) of his income in insurance costs. Previously, this person would have been eligible for Medicaid and would have paid nothing for the coverage.

A person earning $40,000 a year will be responsible for paying %9 (about $3800) of his income in insurance costs. Previously, this person would either get coverage from work, or pay about that same (about $3800 a year) for private coverage.

http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7962-02.pdf

*sigh* The IRS can't put you in jail or place leins against you or take your pay. Language in the law expressly forbids that. People who live in states that decided to keep the medicade expansion like California or New York will still qualify now if they qualified before. If you can't afford the insurance there are exemptions and subsidies availible etc.... http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/09/29/fact-check-ted-cruz-obamacare-health-care/2890995/ http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-myths.php
Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts
Nintendo botched their marketing. How many commercials or billboards have you seen for Wii U? How much hype did Nintendo try to generate before Wii U was lanched? It's like they just released it and expected it to sell without people knowing it exists. When it was first announced people thought it was an add-on to the wii because they refused to talk about the box. The D-pad had Supe Mario bros, the Analog stick had Mario 64, the rumble pak had Starfox 64, the Wii mote had Wii sports, what did the Wii U have to show the potential of the U-pad? There are still retailers who think the Wii U is an add on for the wii. When you ask most people about the Wiii U they don't even know it exists. This is why the price cut didn't help, because the price wasn't the problem. You can make something free and people still aren't going to take it if they don't know it's there.